Skip to main content

autogynephelia revisited

I went to Dr Anne Lawrence's website today and read her article on autogynephelia called "becoming what we love". In the article Anne cites the work of Ray Blanchard and talks about this condition not being just about erotic arousal in starting out as non homosexual MtF transsexuals but also about love and admiration for what is female. It actually reassured me because I had always felt a guilt around the erotic aspects of my dressing. Now I can say that this condition I have is more rooted in love than in the desire to have an orgasm in a dress and panties.

Kudos to Dr Lawrence for finding vindication in Blanchard's work for those who would paint him as an adversary of my type of transexualusm. I never asked for this condition but I find a soothing tone in the way the research is presented and being a transsexual woman herself, she relates directly to her findings in a very personal way.

I feel more educated and better for having read it.

Thank you Anne!

Her article can be found on her website at....
Www.annelawrence.com

Comments

  1. Bravo for you on taking on the subject of AG.
    I don't like the way people are shouted down and ridiculed for discussing this. I myself have dealt with these feeling on a personal level.

    Aldo thanks for the nice comments on Femulate

    ReplyDelete
  2. You are most welcome Paula. I don't think believing that autogynephelia exists and we suffer from it makes us any less legitimate.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Are you sure you have thought this through?

    The essence of what Blanchard and Lawrence say is the following:

    1. Androphilic transwomen (by them called homosexual transsexuals) are effeminate gay men who transition in order to get access to straight men.

    2. Gynephilic transwomen are autoerotic perverted heterosexual men who are attracted to themselves as women.

    There is no room for you as a woman in this theory.

    There cannot be anything wrong about getting aroused by the idea of having sex as a woman. I mean, that is the only way of fantasizing about having sex if you are a woman, and you are one.

    XX women also find clothes and accessories erotic. Freud even argued that all women were fetishists! In other words: Enjoying the erotic part of dressing up is normal, and does not require a special item in the psychiatric manuals.

    Note also that Lawrence, like Blanchard, believes the "autogynephile" love for oneself, stops gynephilic transwomen from loving others.

    Dr. Charles Moser has written a well thought out critique of Blanchard and Lawrence. I have made a summary here.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I really appreciate your feedback here Jack. I am trying to see myself realistically and analyze to the best of my ability what makes me tick.....fine line between acceptance and throwing oneself in headfirst to transition without thinking. I am heavily leaning towards doing nothing but crossedressing to relieve the tension. Funny how you know I'm a woman when I don't lol...

    ReplyDelete
  5. Silly girl. Didn't Jack tell you? He knows everything trans*.

    And if you are so bold as to disagree with "His Know-It-ALL", he will demonize you and banish you to silence.

    ReplyDelete
  6. In my opinion autogynophilia, (AGP). is actually a very good working hypothesis for many in the TG world.

    However, for those suffering from a totally different and unrelated medical condition known as transsexualism, it is a total fail and serves as a glaring example of those interested in advancing a selfserving adgenda which justifies their own internal turmoil. Anne Lawrence is a good example.

    http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/conway/TS/Bailey/Timeline/Timeline%20spreadsheet.htm

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

prejudice disguised as objective rectitude

So here is Professor Jordan Peterson perhaps justly calling out the excesses of political correctness gone mad. But then he extends it to not indulging transgender people the basic dignity of being addressed in their preferred pronoun. To do so for him would cost nothing and to stand on literal principle seems to serve little use other than to send a message of disdain.

If you have transitioned or even live as the opposite gender is costs me nothing to address you in your preferred pronouns. What difference does it make to me and what am I trying to tell you when I don't?

Peterson wants to stand on his rights to call reality what it is except that in this case the exact objective escapes me. But of course the right wing Federalist is in love with him because he calls a spade a spade.

If I see a rock I can call it that but then the rock doesn’t have any feelings. To address a transgender woman "her" and "she" is not undermining my rights as a person in any way b…

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.

the pseudoscience behind gender dysphoria

The real science as to what causes gender dysphoria still awaits.

Harry Benjamin was on to something except he didn’t have the scientific evidence to back up his suspicions hence, like a true scientist, he negated to draw conclusions. His hunch, based on treating so many patients over his lifetime, was that one is born with a predisposition to be gender dysphoric.

However, with inconclusive brain scans and no DNA marker (as of yet) we are left with believing the word of people who need help and only want to lead happy and productive lives.

The best we have been able to muster since Benjamin's death in 1986 was to amass statistics on who gets a boner imagining themselves as a woman which is in equal parts pathetic and disappointing. For this is not really science at all but is instead playing with interview data that doesn't point to anything definitive or conclusive. I have dealt with this problem at great length in my blog.

The whole thing started with Kurt Freund's obses…