Skip to main content

chicken and the egg...

Which comes first? The deviant crossdressing behavior which turns into obsession and pathology or the desire to be female which starts the crossdressing which then develops the odd pattern of behavior? I don't even know if I have put the question correctly.

Back when I first came out to my sister (who is dogmatically religious) she could not accept that I was a crossdresser. She read some websites about people who had been "cured" through some kind of behavior modification therapy and beat the dreaded vice. So for my sister I had a habit that could be cured. All I had to do was pray and read the right things and talk myself out of it somehow.

What I tried to explain to her over several weeks was that this was not a habit that one picks up for fun. No one wants to be different or have to hide because they have a socially unacceptable behavior. So we conform and we purge and we deny. We marry in denial and the dam bursts one day and all falls to pieces right in front of us.

I used to think that this was "cureable" and that the behavior could be modified because I was weak and needed to get stronger. But I was doing what my brain wiring wanted me to do. I was acting on my desire to be girly and feminine. At least part of the time.

But because we get slapped down early we learn to hide and conform. This starts us on the road to secretive and pattern behavior that is sporadic and obsessive because the circumstances demand that it be so. We learn to hide our disphoria and go underground instead of finding a healthy comfortable flow of expression which suits where our brain wiring wants to take us.

Is there biology in this? I'm almost certain that there is. No proof but my instinct tells me I'm right

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

prejudice disguised as objective rectitude

So here is Professor Jordan Peterson perhaps justly calling out the excesses of political correctness gone mad. But then he extends it to not indulging transgender people the basic dignity of being addressed in their preferred pronoun. To do so for him would cost nothing and to stand on literal principle seems to serve little use other than to send a message of disdain.

If you have transitioned or even live as the opposite gender is costs me nothing to address you in your preferred pronouns. What difference does it make to me and what am I trying to tell you when I don't?

Peterson wants to stand on his rights to call reality what it is except that in this case the exact objective escapes me. But of course the right wing Federalist is in love with him because he calls a spade a spade.

If I see a rock I can call it that but then the rock doesn’t have any feelings. To address a transgender woman "her" and "she" is not undermining my rights as a person in any way b…

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.

the pseudoscience behind gender dysphoria

The real science as to what causes gender dysphoria still awaits.

Harry Benjamin was on to something except he didn’t have the scientific evidence to back up his suspicions hence, like a true scientist, he negated to draw conclusions. His hunch, based on treating so many patients over his lifetime, was that one is born with a predisposition to be gender dysphoric.

However, with inconclusive brain scans and no DNA marker (as of yet) we are left with believing the word of people who need help and only want to lead happy and productive lives.

The best we have been able to muster since Benjamin's death in 1986 was to amass statistics on who gets a boner imagining themselves as a woman which is in equal parts pathetic and disappointing. For this is not really science at all but is instead playing with interview data that doesn't point to anything definitive or conclusive. I have dealt with this problem at great length in my blog.

The whole thing started with Kurt Freund's obses…