Skip to main content

my public identity as Joanna

Irrespective of my internal turmoil, I am relishing the public persona that is Joanna. The merchants and friends who only know me as a woman are helping me to bring validity to my female side. This morning as I arrived at the cathedral for the 8 am mass I was greeted by a lady who stands outside asking for some help. She has seen me elsewhere but now knows and expects that I will be there on certain Sundays. She sees me coming and calls out my name. We have a little chat and I give her some change from my purse. She's just one of the people who don't know there's a male underneath the clothes and makeup.

Then after the service I go to a little Starbucks closely where the barista asks me about my kids and my husband. She's very pleasant and I appreciate the banter realizing how different it is between two women.

I don't ever want to take that for granted. Today I prayed that I will find some peace and balance, for the my father whose been gone for many years and for my children.

Comments

  1. "We have a little chat and I give her some change from my purse. She's just one of the people who don't know there's a male underneath the clothes and makeup." ~Joanna

    Is this not that, " pointless game of hiding who you are and playing adult pretend."?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well yes and no. While I meant biologically male there is still the doubt in me about bring transsexual. The confusion these days centers around that and sometimes my posts will appear to be contradictory or have language as such. I wish I could un muddle it all because it would be easier to be a garden variety transvestite.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree that, "it would be easier to be a garden variety transvestite". You feel that your confusion centers around whether or not you are TS. Strangely enough, this is not such a difficult question. It IS however, the WRONG question. The question more simply is are you a man or a woman, or....something in between. That "something in between', would be TG.

    If it is TG then your course is clear. It would be simply a matter of finding that point on the 'gender spectrum' that is most comfortable.

    ReplyDelete
  4. AQV I am exactly trying to determine that. These days I feel like I am somewhere in between. The matter of transition is off the table in the short run but that in between is much closer to woman than man. Finding my comfort point seems to be my issue now. Since I am so happy as Joanna it makes me wonder whether denial is keeping me from being the woman I am. Thank you for your input....

    ReplyDelete
  5. It appears that my discomfort is also around leading a double life. Going to work as male but living as female may not be the answer in the long run but my extensive baggage is causing me much discomfort. The religious dogma, societal pressure, fear for my job and reaction from my kids is weighing on my ability to decide on a course of action. Eventually my repair work on my psyche (through this blog, etc) will pay dividends I hope....

    ReplyDelete
  6. "religious dogma, societal pressure, fear for my job and reaction from my kids is weighing on my ability to decide..."

    Decide what?

    One does not "decide" to be male or female. One is either one or the other. However, how or when one "presents" or "dresses" is of course optional.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Well then I'm a woman who needs to decide what to do next and how and when to present. Therein lies my dilemma!

    ReplyDelete
  8. I'm also afraid of being a woman and giving in is like failing after years of fighting!

    ReplyDelete
  9. I really want to keep the discourse warm and civil AQV. Everyone is unique and has their own demons after all....

    ReplyDelete
  10. I am sorry Joanna. I don't understand. How am I being uncivil? I ask questions, perhaps to help you examine those issues which so trouble you. I offer perceptions and opinions. What you do with them is up to you.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

prejudice disguised as objective rectitude

So here is Professor Jordan Peterson perhaps justly calling out the excesses of political correctness gone mad. But then he extends it to not indulging transgender people the basic dignity of being addressed in their preferred pronoun. To do so for him would cost nothing and to stand on literal principle seems to serve little use other than to send a message of disdain.

If you have transitioned or even live as the opposite gender is costs me nothing to address you in your preferred pronouns. What difference does it make to me and what am I trying to tell you when I don't?

Peterson wants to stand on his rights to call reality what it is except that in this case the exact objective escapes me. But of course the right wing Federalist is in love with him because he calls a spade a spade.

If I see a rock I can call it that but then the rock doesn’t have any feelings. To address a transgender woman "her" and "she" is not undermining my rights as a person in any way b…

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.

the pseudoscience behind gender dysphoria

The real science as to what causes gender dysphoria still awaits.

Harry Benjamin was on to something except he didn’t have the scientific evidence to back up his suspicions hence, like a true scientist, he negated to draw conclusions. His hunch, based on treating so many patients over his lifetime, was that one is born with a predisposition to be gender dysphoric.

However, with inconclusive brain scans and no DNA marker (as of yet) we are left with believing the word of people who need help and only want to lead happy and productive lives.

The best we have been able to muster since Benjamin's death in 1986 was to amass statistics on who gets a boner imagining themselves as a woman which is in equal parts pathetic and disappointing. For this is not really science at all but is instead playing with interview data that doesn't point to anything definitive or conclusive. I have dealt with this problem at great length in my blog.

The whole thing started with Kurt Freund's obses…