Skip to main content

Seeing the positive

I am struggling sometimes to figure out how to turn my gender disphoria to my advantage and make it seem like less of a life handicap. My historical negativity towards GID is of my own making of course as I have spent so much of m life trying to rid myself of these feelings. One thing is acceptance and quite another to actually see the condition as a positive.

I have read some transgendered people’s evaluation of their gender disphoria as a gift and I can somehow understand why some might want to. Maybe the idea of possessing a gender duality appeals to them somehow. I am perhaps getting closer to that level of appreciation but I am not quite there yet I’m afraid.

People are born with all kinds of conditions and manage to live productive lives. The problem with gender issues is that they tend to gestate for long periods of time and the sufferer does not understand the full ramifications of their condition until well into adulthood. If you’re born blind or without a leg you can adjust to that reality and get on with your life, but conditions of the mind are more fluid and evasive.

If one wants to get closer to a comparison you can look at conditions such as schizophrenia or chronic depression where it becomes a daily struggle with your thought processes. You have good days and bad days and there are times when you think you are able to grapple with your feelings and others when you just want to be dead.

The fact that society has not been geared towards a better understanding of conditions of the mind only exacerbates the problem. It was not that long ago, for example, that people were being lobotomized as part of their psychiatric treatment. This barbaric practice went on until the early 1960’s so it is has not been that long since the world has caught up to the reality of how to treat pre-natal mental conditions like GID.

Even as the establishment understands the reality of gender disphoria, society has only begun to catch up with more sensitivity towards the plight of the transgendered. It has not helped that documents like the DSM manual have virtually considered it a mental illness and people like Ray Blanchard and Anne Lawrence have been spending time categorizing us into sub groups of paraphilics.

It has made self acceptance virtually impossible and for an older sufferer such as myself, who lived during the pre internet dark ages, the harrowing fear of disclosure was more fearful than death itself. It is a small wonder that not more of us are not dead or in mental institutions.

The long road back to a sense of well being begins with an understanding that we are simply people with different brain chemistry but deserve to be appreciated and loved just like anyone else. I tell myself this everyday as I work towards removing all of the trappings of guilt, shame and rejection one layer at a time.

Comments

  1. The controversy with autogynephilia is that there is a real overlap between gender dysphoric persons and the uncharitable label of sexual fetishists.

    Those who experience both dysphoria and fetishism, claim that the fetishism is a symptom of their dysphoria.

    Those who experience solely fetishism, claim that it is just a fetish like any other.

    The dysphoric persons feel that the idea of their dysphoria as deriving from fetishism is illegitimating.

    What I see is that autogynephilia clearly is in itself, just a fetish like any other. But the failure is in not appreciating the power of psychological construction. That dysphoria historically deriving from sexuality, does not inherently illegitimate that dysphoria.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes there is indeed an overlap and this juxstaposition is what confused the heck out of me for the longest time and why I blamed myself for failing to rid myself of purely fetishistic behavior. I now understand myself a bit better and in removing my blinders I can allow myself the introspection to get to the roots of my feelings.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

prejudice disguised as objective rectitude

So here is Professor Jordan Peterson perhaps justly calling out the excesses of political correctness gone mad. But then he extends it to not indulging transgender people the basic dignity of being addressed in their preferred pronoun. To do so for him would cost nothing and to stand on literal principle seems to serve little use other than to send a message of disdain.

If you have transitioned or even live as the opposite gender is costs me nothing to address you in your preferred pronouns. What difference does it make to me and what am I trying to tell you when I don't?

Peterson wants to stand on his rights to call reality what it is except that in this case the exact objective escapes me. But of course the right wing Federalist is in love with him because he calls a spade a spade.

If I see a rock I can call it that but then the rock doesn’t have any feelings. To address a transgender woman "her" and "she" is not undermining my rights as a person in any way b…

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.

the pseudoscience behind gender dysphoria

The real science as to what causes gender dysphoria still awaits.

Harry Benjamin was on to something except he didn’t have the scientific evidence to back up his suspicions hence, like a true scientist, he negated to draw conclusions. His hunch, based on treating so many patients over his lifetime, was that one is born with a predisposition to be gender dysphoric.

However, with inconclusive brain scans and no DNA marker (as of yet) we are left with believing the word of people who need help and only want to lead happy and productive lives.

The best we have been able to muster since Benjamin's death in 1986 was to amass statistics on who gets a boner imagining themselves as a woman which is in equal parts pathetic and disappointing. For this is not really science at all but is instead playing with interview data that doesn't point to anything definitive or conclusive. I have dealt with this problem at great length in my blog.

The whole thing started with Kurt Freund's obses…