Skip to main content

rock and a hard place once again

Well I've waded into interesting waters once again.

I met N for coffee and after not having seen her since last January she was a sight for sore eyes. We spoke at length about where each of us was in our respective lives and the conversation flowed well.

At one point it was my turn to bare my soul about where I was with my gender issues and before I knew it I started to cry. I had been telling her that I was in a really good place these days and here I was bawling my eyes out in a cafe.

Back in January I had bought her flowers expecting some sort of reconciliation. When things didn't go the way I expected, I closed the door on her before she could close it on me. This time it was different and we spent almost three hours catching up; at the end of which a door seemed to be opening.

But of course there's a catch.

N is tolerant of my dressing but never wants to see it or participate. The question of indulging versus management even came up. If I am caving in to my desire to dress, what percentage is true need versus over indulgence.

There's the rub.

Living alone has allowed me to find a freedom to dress and manage my disphoria to my liking but in order to return to a relationship with N I would need to curb it. The problem is that I have attained a level of comfort with my cross gender expression that I like. So once again I am forced to choose and truth be told I am not sure to what extent I can now return to suppression.

So I ask myself this simple question: Have I passed a point of no return? Also to what extent should I even suppress in order to meet someone's idea of what a man is even if that expectation is entirely reasonable? Not an easy question but par for the course for my somewhat complicated life.

I'll have some reflecting to do over the coming days and weeks to be sure.


  1. How about, " this simple question"?

    Are you a man, or not?

  2. I don't know. Technically and chromosonally maybe. I desperately want to try and be one. More thinking to come...

  3. If I stay on my own I don't need to even answer that question and I can stay some sort of hybrid. What difference does it make anyway as long as I can live a semblance of a normal life....

  4. It just seems like a prerequisite to your other, much more convoluted questions and a pretty fundamental question.

  5. I am never going to be a woman. I have something that makes me think I want to be one. So really for me its always about how to manage this desire. If I give in to it I feel like I will have failed. So that question cannot be answered as you have asked it..

  6. Sometimes if you do not know the answer to a question the proper response is "I just do not know". You do not have to be the AG or head of the IRS being asked questions by a Congressional committee to simply say "I don't know".
    You are a person and a loving caring person at that. You are also an engineer and a significant component of being an engineer is to work on an issue until a solution is found. Engineering out problems is a little different when dealing with human nature. Things is life tend to be in a state of flux. Engineering works when conditions remain static.

  7. You are right in that I do not know the answer but I have accepted myself for being trans and that will have to do. Whatever trans means in the end. Thanks to both of you...

  8. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

prejudice disguised as objective rectitude

So here is Professor Jordan Peterson perhaps justly calling out the excesses of political correctness gone mad. But then he extends it to not indulging transgender people the basic dignity of being addressed in their preferred pronoun. To do so for him would cost nothing and to stand on literal principle seems to serve little use other than to send a message of disdain.

If you have transitioned or even live as the opposite gender is costs me nothing to address you in your preferred pronouns. What difference does it make to me and what am I trying to tell you when I don't?

Peterson wants to stand on his rights to call reality what it is except that in this case the exact objective escapes me. But of course the right wing Federalist is in love with him because he calls a spade a spade.

If I see a rock I can call it that but then the rock doesn’t have any feelings. To address a transgender woman "her" and "she" is not undermining my rights as a person in any way b…

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.

the pseudoscience behind gender dysphoria

The real science as to what causes gender dysphoria still awaits.

Harry Benjamin was on to something except he didn’t have the scientific evidence to back up his suspicions hence, like a true scientist, he negated to draw conclusions. His hunch, based on treating so many patients over his lifetime, was that one is born with a predisposition to be gender dysphoric.

However, with inconclusive brain scans and no DNA marker (as of yet) we are left with believing the word of people who need help and only want to lead happy and productive lives.

The best we have been able to muster since Benjamin's death in 1986 was to amass statistics on who gets a boner imagining themselves as a woman which is in equal parts pathetic and disappointing. For this is not really science at all but is instead playing with interview data that doesn't point to anything definitive or conclusive. I have dealt with this problem at great length in my blog.

The whole thing started with Kurt Freund's obses…