Skip to main content

the Jaimie Veale study....

l know I have said lately that I would refrain from plunging back into the latest thinking on gender, but Jaimie Veale's study does provide much comfort to transgender people so it is worth mentioning. Jaimie who is herself an early transitioner, completed her study as part of her master's thesis and used over 2000 internet respondants to try and shed new light on our understanding of gender and it's apparent fluidity.

She uses a much larger sample than Ray Blanchard used in his original work at his Alberta gender clinic and comes up with a fascinating cross section of gender expression which astonishes in its variety. What is particularly notable here is that the respondents were not queued for gender surgery and so had less incentive to lie in order to be allowed to transition.

So although Blanchard's sample was more personally and intimately interviewed, the sample was only in the hundreds and only included those who were enrolled in his program.

Not surprisingly, Veale has found that it serves no use to categorize transgender people by whether they transition early or late or by pre transition sexual orientation. She has found that gender variance is indeed a spectrum or rainbow and not a static set of groupings and in doing so further discrediting Blanchard's paraphilia or target error theories.

Simply put, there is everthing under the sun when it comes to gender variance and besides the more extreme kinds of gender disphoria necessitating immediate intervention via full physical and hormonal transformation, there are many who find a baseline using less extreme measures.

Of course transgender people will rejoice in the findings because we are removing the idea of true transsexuals versus paraphilic perverts in dresses axis. I as a self diagnosed advanced but not quite transsexual trans person, find solace in her findings and further puts the final nails in the twisted thinking of Blanchard and company who essentially propose that transexuals are either gay men or perverted paraphilics.

Of course the origins of gender incongruence are still not understood and that may have to wait a while yet. At least Jaimie's work begins to return us to the tone of the original work by Harry Benjamin where there is no judgemental language or crack pot theories but instead purely reporting (with empathy I might add) the lives of gender variant people.

To find out more about the study simply Google Jaimie Veale trans study.

Comments

  1. Very interesting. There can never be any total absolutes when dealing with human nature.
    Pat

    ReplyDelete
  2. "Of course the origins of gender incongruence are still not understood"

    It is utterly astonishing how people continuously fail to realise that it can simply be a matter of how an individual has come to think. The presupposition that "there must be something making me feel this way" must be put into this context.

    ReplyDelete
  3. You are by your own admission in this for only eroticism's own payoff whilst I am disphoric and am interested in how disphoria varies across the spectrum. Clearly I am not including you in the group nor am I including fetish dressers...

    ReplyDelete
  4. I have put up a review of the study here.

    I am sad to say that it hasn't generated much debate online, although I know it has some effect among health professionals.

    ReplyDelete
  5. that's good to hear Jack thanks!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

prejudice disguised as objective rectitude

So here is Professor Jordan Peterson perhaps justly calling out the excesses of political correctness gone mad. But then he extends it to not indulging transgender people the basic dignity of being addressed in their preferred pronoun. To do so for him would cost nothing and to stand on literal principle seems to serve little use other than to send a message of disdain.

If you have transitioned or even live as the opposite gender is costs me nothing to address you in your preferred pronouns. What difference does it make to me and what am I trying to tell you when I don't?

Peterson wants to stand on his rights to call reality what it is except that in this case the exact objective escapes me. But of course the right wing Federalist is in love with him because he calls a spade a spade.

If I see a rock I can call it that but then the rock doesn’t have any feelings. To address a transgender woman "her" and "she" is not undermining my rights as a person in any way b…

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.

the pseudoscience behind gender dysphoria

The real science as to what causes gender dysphoria still awaits.

Harry Benjamin was on to something except he didn’t have the scientific evidence to back up his suspicions hence, like a true scientist, he negated to draw conclusions. His hunch, based on treating so many patients over his lifetime, was that one is born with a predisposition to be gender dysphoric.

However, with inconclusive brain scans and no DNA marker (as of yet) we are left with believing the word of people who need help and only want to lead happy and productive lives.

The best we have been able to muster since Benjamin's death in 1986 was to amass statistics on who gets a boner imagining themselves as a woman which is in equal parts pathetic and disappointing. For this is not really science at all but is instead playing with interview data that doesn't point to anything definitive or conclusive. I have dealt with this problem at great length in my blog.

The whole thing started with Kurt Freund's obses…