Skip to main content

beware of snake oil cures....

I used to read up on that elusive cure for crossdressing and honestly and diligently follow the advice that was prescribed.

Of course this was during the time that I actually believed that I was indeed a crossdresser. Dressing a few times a year did not really qualify.

I was instead looking for a way to cure my gender disphoria.

That feeling that somehow I needed to be female was never really too far from the surface. People who write these stop crossdressing pages are often fetishists who indulge in their fantasies and perhaps take countless pictures in a miriad of outfits.

They are sexually addicted to something and then reach an addiction level which eventually promots them to act and try to go cold turkey. Often these kids started in their mother's closet at or after the age of puberty.

My case was a little different and my disphoria has been with me from earliest memory. My crossdressing manifested itself very early and then went underground once it was discouraged. But after puberty and with signs of embarrassing eroticism, I did my very best to quash everything and bury it under the proverbial carpet.

Do I consider myself a paraphilic or a fetishist as per Ray Blanchard's theory? Absolutely not. Not only do his ideas not speak to my personal experience but I don't subscribe to the notion that toddlers can develop paraphilias. Anne Lawrence can believe what she likes.

But nonetheless, these websites disturb me because young gender disphorics can easily fall prey to the idea that they can cure their "vice" through suppression when nothing could be further from the truth. There is no known cure for gender disphoria and, speaking as someone who couldn't have tried any harder to eradicate mine, suppression is not a successful management tool as it will lead to depression.

Your failed attempts at suppressing something which, for you,is hard wired and natural will only lead to disappointment and frustration when you fail to defeat it.

It took me decades to understand this and my heart goes out to young kids who are still in search of who they are.

Comments

  1. Great post. I totally agree that suppression is bad for anyone with gender dysphoria. I think its probable that anyone suffering from GD does not have a paraphilia.

    Maybe the only permanent cure for GD is SRS. In lieu of that the best we can do is to try to minimize it.

    Lindsay

    ReplyDelete
  2. I do not think SRS is the cure for GD. I think that GD can be managed depending on the degree of GD in much the same way that other physical and mental conditions can be managed.
    In my case and perhaps yours just being able to present a feminine expression from time to time without regard to guilt, or fear, or dishonesty and to be accepted in our feminine presentations goes a long way towards calming GD.
    Pat

    ReplyDelete
  3. Srs may cure it but potentially introduce a whole new series of problems if you are not a full blown transsexual. I think having the right management strategy is the way to go...

    ReplyDelete
  4. "I actually believed that I was indeed a crossdresser. Dressing a few times a year did not really qualify"

    So there is a minimum times per year that qualifies one as a crossdresser?

    "I think its probable that anyone suffering from GD does not have a paraphilia.
    Maybe the only permanent cure for GD is SRS"

    Hmmm....So anybody that suffers from GD does not have a paraphilia and the only cure for GD is SRS. Hmmm.....

    "In my case and perhaps yours just being able to present a feminine expression from time to time without regard to guilt, or fear, or dishonesty and to be accepted in our feminine presentations goes a long way towards calming GD."

    So cross-dressing actually helps manage the dysphoria, but we can't call it cross-dressing because that sounds too much like a compulsive paraphilia.. So we call it " a feminine expression"., because calling it that sounds better and helps to absolve the cross-dresser of their guilt and shame. Yet if you do not cross-dress, I mean engage in 'feminine expression', then your head might explode.

    Hmmm...

    Lindsay is right. Those of us who do not suffer from GD just do not understand how mixing and matching the words helps any more than mixing and matching one's wardrobe. Sorry....

    ReplyDelete
  5. OK. I give up.

    http://www.edgeprovidence.com/index.php?ch=news&sc=&sc2=news&sc3=&id=147847

    ReplyDelete
  6. I don't need to convince you of anything AQV. Pat and Lindsay understand what I am trying to say. I did not make any refetences to you in these entries now did I? I don't always understand why you must always feel compelled to comment in such a way that somehow shows you feel threatened and no I don't believe that you can be born with a paraphilia sorry nor develop it at a ridiculously young age.

    As to the crossdressing you will note that many people with disphoria including many transsexuals went through periods of crossdressing but were not crossdressers per se. Do I think the frequency and intent are relevant? Most definitely. But I don't need to convince you I just need to be at a good management place which I am getting ever closer to.

    ReplyDelete
  7. No I do call it crossdressing because that is how I manage my disphoria. I have no problem with that. Did I introduce my disphoria into my life? Most definitely not.

    I have to do what I have to do to manage something I did not ask for which has always been the main topic of this blog.

    Would I crossdress if I did not have disphoria? You have been reading my blog long enough to know the answer to that but in needing to do so I will no longer feel bad about it.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I agree. No need to convince me.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

prejudice disguised as objective rectitude

So here is Professor Jordan Peterson perhaps justly calling out the excesses of political correctness gone mad. But then he extends it to not indulging transgender people the basic dignity of being addressed in their preferred pronoun. To do so for him would cost nothing and to stand on literal principle seems to serve little use other than to send a message of disdain.

If you have transitioned or even live as the opposite gender is costs me nothing to address you in your preferred pronouns. What difference does it make to me and what am I trying to tell you when I don't?

Peterson wants to stand on his rights to call reality what it is except that in this case the exact objective escapes me. But of course the right wing Federalist is in love with him because he calls a spade a spade.

If I see a rock I can call it that but then the rock doesn’t have any feelings. To address a transgender woman "her" and "she" is not undermining my rights as a person in any way b…

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.

the pseudoscience behind gender dysphoria

The real science as to what causes gender dysphoria still awaits.

Harry Benjamin was on to something except he didn’t have the scientific evidence to back up his suspicions hence, like a true scientist, he negated to draw conclusions. His hunch, based on treating so many patients over his lifetime, was that one is born with a predisposition to be gender dysphoric.

However, with inconclusive brain scans and no DNA marker (as of yet) we are left with believing the word of people who need help and only want to lead happy and productive lives.

The best we have been able to muster since Benjamin's death in 1986 was to amass statistics on who gets a boner imagining themselves as a woman which is in equal parts pathetic and disappointing. For this is not really science at all but is instead playing with interview data that doesn't point to anything definitive or conclusive. I have dealt with this problem at great length in my blog.

The whole thing started with Kurt Freund's obses…