Skip to main content

Peacock

"Peacock" - starring Cillian Murphy is an odd but curious film.

I saw it one evening when I happened to be scrolling through my cable provider’s movie offerings and, since I had heard of the film and of Cillian’s performance, I thought I would watch it.

One thing that struck me was how atypical the film was at covering certain elements. For one thing, Emma (his female alter ego) wore male underwear under her dress. The film also suggests that there was verbal and/or physical abuse behind John’s split personality; which is more or less convincing and is left largely unexplored.

Oddly no one was able to recognize John as Emma and, as real as Cillian looked in either gender, there was enough obvious resemblance there to have had someone at least scratching their heads.

Cillian Murphy is slight and almost pretty for a man so he passes quite easily as a woman. This aspect of the film is well done. But other aspects fall short and we are left wondering about several loose threads regarding the full history of John/Emma and how he comes to live his life in such a schizophrenic fashion.

Still, as a low budget art film it has its merits and I would recommend you view it given the opportunity.


Comments

  1. Joanna, what email address can I contact you on?

    Monica M

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Monica....I prefer not to post my email address here in the comments section of the blog. However here is a temporary email address for you.....joanna.verdun@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

prejudice disguised as objective rectitude

So here is Professor Jordan Peterson perhaps justly calling out the excesses of political correctness gone mad. But then he extends it to not indulging transgender people the basic dignity of being addressed in their preferred pronoun. To do so for him would cost nothing and to stand on literal principle seems to serve little use other than to send a message of disdain.

If you have transitioned or even live as the opposite gender is costs me nothing to address you in your preferred pronouns. What difference does it make to me and what am I trying to tell you when I don't?

Peterson wants to stand on his rights to call reality what it is except that in this case the exact objective escapes me. But of course the right wing Federalist is in love with him because he calls a spade a spade.

If I see a rock I can call it that but then the rock doesn’t have any feelings. To address a transgender woman "her" and "she" is not undermining my rights as a person in any way b…

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.

the pseudoscience behind gender dysphoria

The real science as to what causes gender dysphoria still awaits.

Harry Benjamin was on to something except he didn’t have the scientific evidence to back up his suspicions hence, like a true scientist, he negated to draw conclusions. His hunch, based on treating so many patients over his lifetime, was that one is born with a predisposition to be gender dysphoric.

However, with inconclusive brain scans and no DNA marker (as of yet) we are left with believing the word of people who need help and only want to lead happy and productive lives.

The best we have been able to muster since Benjamin's death in 1986 was to amass statistics on who gets a boner imagining themselves as a woman which is in equal parts pathetic and disappointing. For this is not really science at all but is instead playing with interview data that doesn't point to anything definitive or conclusive. I have dealt with this problem at great length in my blog.

The whole thing started with Kurt Freund's obses…