Skip to main content

Something has to change

I was listening to CBC Radio yesterday and there was suddenly a story highlighting the sharing of wealth among the population in each country in the world.

Not surprisingly leading the way was the United States where the richest 1% of the population was responsible for amassing 50% of the economic wealth. If you think about this figure it is staggering and points to a problem that we are all seeing – the shrinking middle class.

While I am not a communist I find that statistic troubling and mind numbing.

More troubling still is that my own country which has historically prided itself on being a little more socially conscious and collective in its social policy and political thinking was second on the list at 38% of the wealth being amassed by the richest 1%.

Downtown Montreal has people at virtually every street corner asking for money and it’s a phenomenon that has grown steadily since the mid 1980’s. What this shows me is that the global distribution of wealth is not working. Increasingly the middle class is dropping into a new class known as the working poor and the top earners are taking their winnings and keeping them.

There never was any such thing as trickle-down economics and with all due respect to any Reaganites out there it’s easier for these guys to move their plants to Mexico, China or Malaysia so they skip the taxes and avoid paying fair wages.

As much as Americans like to claim that free market capitalism works in fact the opposite is showing itself to be true. There is a huge disparity in wealth in the United States and more and more people are falling off the grid.

People are starting to notice.

We buy cheap crap from China but the Chinese are going to get tired of producing our junk for peanuts and things will eventually change. Along with that change will be in shift in the balance of power.

For those that forget how the United States was built it’s good to remember that FDR built his economy on the New Deal and high taxes on the rich. A strong middle class was then subsequently built which was able to afford a high quality of life with families where only one parent worked.

Today we struggle even at two incomes and the coming generations are poorer than the baby boomers that came before them.

Something has to change.


  1. Talking about redistribution or wealth or the new misnomer of economic fairness served as a basis for many of the communist and socialist theorists. What we are looking at is a massive growth of government and tax systems that are confiscatory. The current admininstration has succeeded in raising the income tax rate to over 39%. Add to that the high state tax rates in many states such as California (13% and NY 10%) and you can understand why those with wealth will look to do what they can to preserve the fruits of their labor. Having the highest corporate tax rate in the world of 35% almost forces companies to move elsewhere.
    The socialist concept of redistribution creates a permanent non working class. The economy in this country has been terrible over the past 6 years. On election day 2008 we had twice the economy of China. This weeks statistics show that in that 6 year period the economy of China has come to match that of the US.
    The administration that has grown the deficit from an absurd $9 trillion to $17 has put the burden on all of us and our children and grandchildren. Businesses have been choked out of existance by taxes and regulations. How do you get incentives back to grow anything if the government will deprive you of the benefits of your efforts.

  2. Pat I am just talking about the general concept that greed does not work and you need to set up companies where there is a fair wage structure. Why do some CEOs make bonuses in the millions? there are good business models in your country but very bad ones as well. I am not a proponent of spreading money around but simply being more equitable in your business practices so that everyone is treated fairly. The Walmart model is a failure.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

prejudice disguised as objective rectitude

So here is Professor Jordan Peterson perhaps justly calling out the excesses of political correctness gone mad. But then he extends it to not indulging transgender people the basic dignity of being addressed in their preferred pronoun. To do so for him would cost nothing and to stand on literal principle seems to serve little use other than to send a message of disdain.

If you have transitioned or even live as the opposite gender is costs me nothing to address you in your preferred pronouns. What difference does it make to me and what am I trying to tell you when I don't?

Peterson wants to stand on his rights to call reality what it is except that in this case the exact objective escapes me. But of course the right wing Federalist is in love with him because he calls a spade a spade.

If I see a rock I can call it that but then the rock doesn’t have any feelings. To address a transgender woman "her" and "she" is not undermining my rights as a person in any way b…

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.

the pseudoscience behind gender dysphoria

The real science as to what causes gender dysphoria still awaits.

Harry Benjamin was on to something except he didn’t have the scientific evidence to back up his suspicions hence, like a true scientist, he negated to draw conclusions. His hunch, based on treating so many patients over his lifetime, was that one is born with a predisposition to be gender dysphoric.

However, with inconclusive brain scans and no DNA marker (as of yet) we are left with believing the word of people who need help and only want to lead happy and productive lives.

The best we have been able to muster since Benjamin's death in 1986 was to amass statistics on who gets a boner imagining themselves as a woman which is in equal parts pathetic and disappointing. For this is not really science at all but is instead playing with interview data that doesn't point to anything definitive or conclusive. I have dealt with this problem at great length in my blog.

The whole thing started with Kurt Freund's obses…