Skip to main content

more than meets the eye

I find it fascinating that the satisfaction rates for GRS among gynephilic transsexuals parallels those of androphilic ones.

If we forget for a moment Ray Blanchard’s two typology model of Autogynephilic and Homosexual, we see that at the end of the process all transsexuals eventually arrive at the same destination. I cannot understand why however.

If the AGP model of love of self as woman fetishist is correct then these people should not theoretically have a high GRS satisfaction rate; the reason? They are not women and should therefore at some point exhibit regret and revert to being males. After all if your only driver for transsexual surgery is eroticism then why not be happy by simply crossdressing and masturbating?

But if we focus just on sexual orientation could this be the main factor that distinguishes late transitioning gynephilics and early transitioning androphilics? I have written about this before in my blog.

By the age of 12 most children know their sexual leanings lie. They are either attracted to members of their own sex or to members of the opposite sex. If we add gender dysphoria to the mix we have an individual who is also gender conflicted and is more likely to transition early if they are attracted to their own sex. These children are typically more effeminate than average and have less reason to combat their gender dysphoria.

Conversely, heterosexual dysphorics will fight tooth and nail to defeat their gender confusion by marrying women and conceiving children; often being able to do so only by imagining they are women during intercourse. By middle age their proverbial bell goes off and they must transition or face psychological paralysis. In other words they hit the wall.

However Ray Blanchard’s model focuses on transition due to love of self as woman versus transition due to love of attracting heterosexual male partners. The origin and reason for the transition is left unexplained because of the absence of genetic or brain evidence. Therefore, you are either a fetishist or a homosexual with an appetite for greater variety of partners.

Why did Blanchard approve these surgeries? Because they help the patient.

Why do they help the patient? We have no idea.

Labelling people but then leaving the impetus for the surgery unexplained is not really science. You can always accuse these people of being mentally ill but the evidence suggests that they are lucid and in many cases score several points higher in IQ than the average person.

There is still a great mystery to be solved here and much more remains to be explained than meets the eye.


Ray Blanchard

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.

the pseudoscience behind gender dysphoria

The real science as to what causes gender dysphoria still awaits.

Harry Benjamin was on to something except he didn’t have the scientific evidence to back up his suspicions hence, like a true scientist, he negated to draw conclusions. His hunch, based on treating so many patients over his lifetime, was that one is born with a predisposition to be gender dysphoric.

However, with inconclusive brain scans and no DNA marker (as of yet) we are left with believing the word of people who need help and only want to lead happy and productive lives.

The best we have been able to muster since Benjamin's death in 1986 was to amass statistics on who gets a boner imagining themselves as a woman which is in equal parts pathetic and disappointing. For this is not really science at all but is instead playing with interview data that doesn't point to anything definitive or conclusive. I have dealt with this problem at great length in my blog.

The whole thing started with Kurt Freund's obses…

looking past cross gender arousal

Jack’s latest Crossdreamers post got me thinking about cross gender arousal and how it could be avoided; also whether it even matters. This with particular focus on the inability to relate of someone on the outside looking in.

You see, sexuality is a very complicated thing to begin with and when you then add gender identity ambiguity it becomes a recipe to really confuse someone.

So imagine that you are a little boy who identifies as a girl but then along comes puberty and short circuits everything by having the sex you identify with also be the sex you are attracted to. For in essence this is what happens to all all male to female gender dysphoric trans persons who are attracted to women.

So I ask myself: can I imagine a scenario where this inherent contradiction would not produce sexual confusion? The answer is that I cannot.

I am in the unique position, like many of you, to have experienced an early identification with the feminine become sexualized later on. This brought confusion…