Skip to main content

the final nail for Autogynephilia

Autogynephilia is not much of a theory but it was an attempt at introducing science in an area where none existed previously. It is increasingly becoming more pseudo science than anything else.

Ray Blanchard tried to explain why his gynephilic patients were coming to him for transsexual surgeries and by noting the common arousal patterns present in the vast majority of them, he came up with a term that described the behaviour. The problem was that this same arousal was also present in people we used to call transvestites and now term crossdressers. Why is this latter group not interested in the transformative surgery as well? Might there be another driver present?

Harry Benjamin focused on possible causes for gender dysphoria but never found an explanation. He saw and noted the eroticism present but wisely chose not to focus on it because he understood this was not the main driver behind the desire for transsexual surgeries.

To date no scientific explanations for the causes of gender dysphoria have been found but we can trace the presence of gender incongruity in the vast majority of transsexuals and in most transvestites to ages well before puberty. In order to make his Autogynephilia hypothesis work, Blanchard needed to also propose that the prepubescent child had to be driven by sexual excitation of being feminised; a particularly weak element of his theory. Anne Lawrence ended up writing about this in one of her essays “Men trapped in Men’s bodies” and was rather unsuccessful at it since the premise is very tenuous to begin with.

In addition, failing to identify female to male transsexuals was the final nail in the coffin for Blanchard’s theory. We certainly know they exist as do the female counterparts to the male transvestite. They are less easy to single out because they are able to use the greater sartorial freedom available to them to mask their presence. You will find these women online if you look for them and they post on Jack Molay’s crossdreamers site with regular frequency.

Autogynephilia is now being espoused by people who identify as crossdressers but they need not do that since the term means nothing more than sexual arousal at one's own image as a woman. It doesn't even come close to explaining why some gynephilic men choose to have surgery which was its original intent. There are also now fetishists who identify with the term.

But even if a global unifying theory for transsexualism is proving to be more elusive than ever, we are in the meantime developing a very diverse portrait of gender diversity and fluidity in people. The current atmosphere of openness in our respective societies is drawing them out instead of keeping them in the shadows where they have always existed. These people often have their own self descriptors because this is a difficult area of the human condition to peg down. We have settled for the all encompassing term of gender dysphoria but we could use something else. After all, not everyone is uncomfortable with their current physical body and instead content themselves with celebrating and exhibiting their gender diversity in other ways.

With all of this openness, we will hopefully see more cohesive and comprehensive models being developed which help categorize and explain gender variance in all of its forms.

What an interesting period in the history of gender variance this is proving to be.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

prejudice disguised as objective rectitude

So here is Professor Jordan Peterson perhaps justly calling out the excesses of political correctness gone mad. But then he extends it to not indulging transgender people the basic dignity of being addressed in their preferred pronoun. To do so for him would cost nothing and to stand on literal principle seems to serve little use other than to send a message of disdain.

If you have transitioned or even live as the opposite gender is costs me nothing to address you in your preferred pronouns. What difference does it make to me and what am I trying to tell you when I don't?

Peterson wants to stand on his rights to call reality what it is except that in this case the exact objective escapes me. But of course the right wing Federalist is in love with him because he calls a spade a spade.

If I see a rock I can call it that but then the rock doesn’t have any feelings. To address a transgender woman "her" and "she" is not undermining my rights as a person in any way b…

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.

the pseudoscience behind gender dysphoria

The real science as to what causes gender dysphoria still awaits.

Harry Benjamin was on to something except he didn’t have the scientific evidence to back up his suspicions hence, like a true scientist, he negated to draw conclusions. His hunch, based on treating so many patients over his lifetime, was that one is born with a predisposition to be gender dysphoric.

However, with inconclusive brain scans and no DNA marker (as of yet) we are left with believing the word of people who need help and only want to lead happy and productive lives.

The best we have been able to muster since Benjamin's death in 1986 was to amass statistics on who gets a boner imagining themselves as a woman which is in equal parts pathetic and disappointing. For this is not really science at all but is instead playing with interview data that doesn't point to anything definitive or conclusive. I have dealt with this problem at great length in my blog.

The whole thing started with Kurt Freund's obses…