Skip to main content

still a ways to go

The origin of gender dysphoria is still very much a mystery and no one to date has come up with a plausible scientific explanation. What we are left with instead is conjecture and theories based on behavioral patterns.

The work of Ray Blanchard has been a failure because by trying to formulate a theory using a very small patient sampling, ignoring female to male transsexuals and focusing on erotic imprinting (or what he terms AGP) he has managed to insult everyone involved plus come up gloriously short with his pseudo science

Erotic imprinting is a blind alley because it appears well after the patients have established a desire to be female (typically 5 to 10 years of age) and because as the sensual overtones of being transformed into a woman wane with increasing age, the desire to be female increases instead of decreasing. This is of course counter intuitive and Blanchard has no plausible explanation for this.

Androphilic transsexuals are not spared any embarassment either as for Blanchard they are men with an appetite for heterosexual males and he sees that as their motivation for surgery. Lawrence and Moser also did studies where some androphilics reported experiencing AGP fantasies prior to transition (albeit in condiderably smaller proportions than gynephilics) which only adds insult to injury.

But eroticism can be explained if one views it through the prism of sexual orientation. If gender dysphorics are split by sexual orientation it makes sense that their behavior would be different. Gynephilics being attracted to women would experience confusion between a desire to be female and a desire to be with a female whereas an androphilic would have no such conflict. We should remember that eroticism appears at puberty when the sexual orientation of the child has been set.

In the end the satisfaction rates among gynephilic and androphilic transsexuals are comparable but not every case has a happy result. I can point to examples such as Philip Porter as an androphilic transsexual who now lives as a gay man and to Thirdwaytrans as a gynephilic who has also reverted to living as a male.

If one also factors in female to male transsexualism we clearly see that the work of Blanchard has been a catastrophic disaster in terms of trying to represent itself as a scientific model.

As I have said here before many times: there is much more than meets the eye to this very complex subject.

Chris Pagani - fellow dysphoric and brilliant analyst

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.

the pseudoscience behind gender dysphoria

The real science as to what causes gender dysphoria still awaits.

Harry Benjamin was on to something except he didn’t have the scientific evidence to back up his suspicions hence, like a true scientist, he negated to draw conclusions. His hunch, based on treating so many patients over his lifetime, was that one is born with a predisposition to be gender dysphoric.

However, with inconclusive brain scans and no DNA marker (as of yet) we are left with believing the word of people who need help and only want to lead happy and productive lives.

The best we have been able to muster since Benjamin's death in 1986 was to amass statistics on who gets a boner imagining themselves as a woman which is in equal parts pathetic and disappointing. For this is not really science at all but is instead playing with interview data that doesn't point to anything definitive or conclusive. I have dealt with this problem at great length in my blog.

The whole thing started with Kurt Freund's obses…

looking past cross gender arousal

Jack’s latest Crossdreamers post got me thinking about cross gender arousal and how it could be avoided; also whether it even matters. This with particular focus on the inability to relate of someone on the outside looking in.

You see, sexuality is a very complicated thing to begin with and when you then add gender identity ambiguity it becomes a recipe to really confuse someone.

So imagine that you are a little boy who identifies as a girl but then along comes puberty and short circuits everything by having the sex you identify with also be the sex you are attracted to. For in essence this is what happens to all all male to female gender dysphoric trans persons who are attracted to women.

So I ask myself: can I imagine a scenario where this inherent contradiction would not produce sexual confusion? The answer is that I cannot.

I am in the unique position, like many of you, to have experienced an early identification with the feminine become sexualized later on. This brought confusion…