Skip to main content

still a ways to go

The origin of gender dysphoria is still very much a mystery and no one to date has come up with a plausible scientific explanation. What we are left with instead is conjecture and theories based on behavioral patterns.

The work of Ray Blanchard has been a failure because by trying to formulate a theory using a very small patient sampling, ignoring female to male transsexuals and focusing on erotic imprinting (or what he terms AGP) he has managed to insult everyone involved plus come up gloriously short with his pseudo science

Erotic imprinting is a blind alley because it appears well after the patients have established a desire to be female (typically 5 to 10 years of age) and because as the sensual overtones of being transformed into a woman wane with increasing age, the desire to be female increases instead of decreasing. This is of course counter intuitive and Blanchard has no plausible explanation for this.

Androphilic transsexuals are not spared any embarassment either as for Blanchard they are men with an appetite for heterosexual males and he sees that as their motivation for surgery. Lawrence and Moser also did studies where some androphilics reported experiencing AGP fantasies prior to transition (albeit in condiderably smaller proportions than gynephilics) which only adds insult to injury.

But eroticism can be explained if one views it through the prism of sexual orientation. If gender dysphorics are split by sexual orientation it makes sense that their behavior would be different. Gynephilics being attracted to women would experience confusion between a desire to be female and a desire to be with a female whereas an androphilic would have no such conflict. We should remember that eroticism appears at puberty when the sexual orientation of the child has been set.

In the end the satisfaction rates among gynephilic and androphilic transsexuals are comparable but not every case has a happy result. I can point to examples such as Philip Porter as an androphilic transsexual who now lives as a gay man and to Thirdwaytrans as a gynephilic who has also reverted to living as a male.

If one also factors in female to male transsexualism we clearly see that the work of Blanchard has been a catastrophic disaster in terms of trying to represent itself as a scientific model.

As I have said here before many times: there is much more than meets the eye to this very complex subject.

Chris Pagani - fellow dysphoric and brilliant analyst

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

my last post

This will be my last blog post.

When I wrote recently that this blog had another seven years of life in it I was trying to convince myself that it was true. It was in fact a little bit of self delusion.

With almost 3,000 posts to date I have accomplished what I set out to do which was to heal myself and in the process share some of the struggle I had been through with others on the chance they might find some value in my words. After seven years of writing, my life still isn't perfect; no one's is. But I have discovered a path forward completely free of the trappings which society would have had me adopt so I could fit in.

Over the last 25 years of my life I have turned over every stone I could find while exploring this topic and in the process realized that we haven't even begun to scratch the surface of this deeply complex subject. What I have ultimately learned is that my instincts have more value than what someone who isn't gender dysphoric writes about me. We are …

epilogue

While this blog is most definitely over, I wanted to explain that part of the reason is that it was getting in the way of writing my next book called "Notes, Essays and Short Stories from the North" which will combine philosophy, trans issues, my observations on life, some short fiction and things that have happened to me over my life and continue to (both trans related and not).

When it is complete I will post the news here and will be happy to send you a free copy upon request in either PDF or eBook format. All I ask is that you provide me with some feedback once you're done reading it.

I'm only in the early stages so it will be a while.

Be well all of you....

sample pages...
















love of self

If you feel you are doing something wrong it shows. Your demeanor, body language and facial expression all conspire to betray you.

You are a clandestine "man in a dress"; you know it and everyone else can too. Your cover has been blown. I've been there and it's frustrating. The source goes back to your self image and the notion that you are somehow a freak of nature; and perhaps you are but what of it? the only way out is to embrace yourself fully and unconditionally. I don't mean to suggest that you are perfect but just that you were created this way and you need not seek forgiveness for it. You are a creation of God.

Misinterpreted religion is a big culprit in all this. These negative images of yourself came from reinforcement of stereotypes by ignorant people interpreting what is right and moral by their own barometer. You simply ingested the message and bought it as the gospel truth. Self confidence and critical thinking is the way out of your dilemma. It can…