Skip to main content

understanding what we are

Ray Blanchard’s Autogynephelia theory is offered as the explanation for men suffering from transvestic fetishism resorting to surgery to become facsimiles of women. But why would a fetishist wish to take hormones and have surgery and why are they still content years after their procedure?

It appears that Autogynephelia does nothing more than point to a reality that everyone as far back as Magnus Hirschfield observed and acknowledged. It is not really an explanation for the origins of gender dysphoria which is why it is best relegated to the category of pseudo-science. It hangs its very premise on the notion that prepubescent children can fall victim to fetishes. Harry Benjamin noted it but did not focus on it in his 1966 publication because he believed it to be a result of gender confusion and not a driving force. He preferred to focus on his disorientation scale.

People who go to fetish clubs dressed in body hugging latex and high heels are perfectly happy in their skin as males. They suffer no dysphoria and have no interest in going to the mall and having coffee with the girls or going out and being perceived as real women in the world. These people do not seek out hormones or surgery because there is no gender dissonance in their brain.

Similarly, a person like Thorin who was kind enough to comment in my blog that he used to suffer from a sexual addiction was able to curb his dressing because he also does not suffer from gender dysphoria.

Gender dysphorics understand that their feelings predate any sexual association that puberty may have brought with it. I have addressed that correlation in a previous post but the basic idea is that a heterosexual dysphoric male melds in his mind his love for women with his desire to be one. The problem with Blanchard's proposition is that it can only work if his fetish concept begins far before puberty which runs counter to the personal experiences of most transgendered people.

Anne Lawrence in her essay "Becoming What We Love" goes out on a limb to support her mentor Blanchard. In it she states: "There are two case reports of boys younger than age three who expressed a desire to wear cross-sex clothing and who experienced penile erections when they did so (Stoller 1985; Zucker and Blanchard 1997).These boys plausibly displayed an early form of autogynephilic arousal". Needless to say, Lawrence accepts herself as an autogynephilic transsexual. Personally I never had an erotic feeling about being a girl and not so much as an erection until I was well into puberty and I doubt most of you have either.

Those of us with this condition can trace its origins to our early childhood. We knew something was amiss but were either afraid to acknowledge it or were castigated for exhibiting any signs of it. We bought into the idea that we could become normal for others. Many of us in our early lives want to think of ourselves as fetish dressers because that would give us a possible out with our dysphoria. If we don’t suffer a condition beyond our control then we can just cure ourselves and lead normal lives. It took me many years to admit that I had dysphoria after refusing even to entertain the notion. As I progressed further into reading and looking into my inner self I realized and finally accepted that I had a lifelong condition to manage.

Thankfully science is progressing and the individualized treatment methods used to treat dysphoria today are working very well. Helene Cote’s group has a variety of people in it who are in varying degrees of transition. Some will never do so while some are well on their way towards gender role transition. She and all serious therapists and theoreticians working in this field acknowledge the existence of dysphoria and this blog regularly relies on their publications.

But all that aside, the hardest part of this process involves understanding yourself and how much of your condition is within your control. If your dysphoria is of a manageable magnitude you may be able to find a solution that does not overly disrupt your current existence.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

prejudice disguised as objective rectitude

So here is Professor Jordan Peterson perhaps justly calling out the excesses of political correctness gone mad. But then he extends it to not indulging transgender people the basic dignity of being addressed in their preferred pronoun. To do so for him would cost nothing and to stand on literal principle seems to serve little use other than to send a message of disdain.

If you have transitioned or even live as the opposite gender is costs me nothing to address you in your preferred pronouns. What difference does it make to me and what am I trying to tell you when I don't?

Peterson wants to stand on his rights to call reality what it is except that in this case the exact objective escapes me. But of course the right wing Federalist is in love with him because he calls a spade a spade.

If I see a rock I can call it that but then the rock doesn’t have any feelings. To address a transgender woman "her" and "she" is not undermining my rights as a person in any way b…

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.

the pseudoscience behind gender dysphoria

The real science as to what causes gender dysphoria still awaits.

Harry Benjamin was on to something except he didn’t have the scientific evidence to back up his suspicions hence, like a true scientist, he negated to draw conclusions. His hunch, based on treating so many patients over his lifetime, was that one is born with a predisposition to be gender dysphoric.

However, with inconclusive brain scans and no DNA marker (as of yet) we are left with believing the word of people who need help and only want to lead happy and productive lives.

The best we have been able to muster since Benjamin's death in 1986 was to amass statistics on who gets a boner imagining themselves as a woman which is in equal parts pathetic and disappointing. For this is not really science at all but is instead playing with interview data that doesn't point to anything definitive or conclusive. I have dealt with this problem at great length in my blog.

The whole thing started with Kurt Freund's obses…