Skip to main content

why this blog must be wrong

Some of you may have heard of Harry Benjamin Syndrome. It is a condition invented by militant androphilic transsexuals who insist that they were suffering from it before their surgical and hormonal correction. Having had their life saving procedure they were now the true women they had always been.

There's only one problem: Harry Benjamin had nothing to do with naming it nor with its conception, it has no basis in science and no current or past expert advocates it nor promotes it.

Harry Benjamin's sole aim was to help his patients and over the course of his lifetime he treated close to 2,000 of them. This experience is what allowed him to develop his gender disorientation scale. If you read "The Transsexual Phenomenon" cover to cover you will see no mention of who among his patients was a woman and who wasn't because he was treating dysphoria. Consequently, he ended developing his disorientation scale where hormone therapy and surgery was the required intervention for the most extreme patients (namely types V and VI).

HBS transsexuals however, prefer to believe that gender dysphoria is not graded. Therefore the patients below them on the Benjamim scale who either did not transition fully, lived part time or crossdressed were either perverts or freaks. All of this thinking developping well after Benjamin's death.

Why do some of them believe this? because in the absence of this tenet, they believe their whole legitimacy as women might be called into question somehow. I don't entirely follow the logic myself but this is what some believe. They alone are suffering from a complete psychosexual inversion while the rest of tbe pack are men in dresses.

The work by Ray Blanchard seemed to help their cause at first because the Autogynephelia concept seemed to support the idea that gynephilic dysphoric men were driven by an erotic impulse to become facsimiles of women but then he also had to theorize that his androphilic patients were simply homosexual men looking for heterosexual male partners. Therefore his work could not be espoused either. For Blanchard all transsexuals are men.

This blog supports now and always has supported transitions for people who need them. It does not support crackpot theories by frustrated transsexuals who need to validate themselves by disparaging others.

HBS trannsexuals are all but completely discredited now but you will still find the odd fringe blog out there in cyberspace.

Comments

  1. You make some excellent points, Joanna, and have persuaded me to buy a copy of Anne Vitale (whom others have also recommended). I notice that Anne Lawrence's book contains only two fleeting references to Benjamin in 240 pages, which tells us a lot about where she's coming from! I've added your site to the 'blog roll' on my own blog, so I can keep up with your thoughts. D

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you for your feedback Dabrela!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.

the pseudoscience behind gender dysphoria

The real science as to what causes gender dysphoria still awaits.

Harry Benjamin was on to something except he didn’t have the scientific evidence to back up his suspicions hence, like a true scientist, he negated to draw conclusions. His hunch, based on treating so many patients over his lifetime, was that one is born with a predisposition to be gender dysphoric.

However, with inconclusive brain scans and no DNA marker (as of yet) we are left with believing the word of people who need help and only want to lead happy and productive lives.

The best we have been able to muster since Benjamin's death in 1986 was to amass statistics on who gets a boner imagining themselves as a woman which is in equal parts pathetic and disappointing. For this is not really science at all but is instead playing with interview data that doesn't point to anything definitive or conclusive. I have dealt with this problem at great length in my blog.

The whole thing started with Kurt Freund's obses…

looking past cross gender arousal

Jack’s latest Crossdreamers post got me thinking about cross gender arousal and how it could be avoided; also whether it even matters. This with particular focus on the inability to relate of someone on the outside looking in.

You see, sexuality is a very complicated thing to begin with and when you then add gender identity ambiguity it becomes a recipe to really confuse someone.

So imagine that you are a little boy who identifies as a girl but then along comes puberty and short circuits everything by having the sex you identify with also be the sex you are attracted to. For in essence this is what happens to all all male to female gender dysphoric trans persons who are attracted to women.

So I ask myself: can I imagine a scenario where this inherent contradiction would not produce sexual confusion? The answer is that I cannot.

I am in the unique position, like many of you, to have experienced an early identification with the feminine become sexualized later on. This brought confusion…