Skip to main content

why this blog must be wrong

Some of you may have heard of Harry Benjamin Syndrome. It is a condition invented by militant androphilic transsexuals who insist that they were suffering from it before their surgical and hormonal correction. Having had their life saving procedure they were now the true women they had always been.

There's only one problem: Harry Benjamin had nothing to do with naming it nor with its conception, it has no basis in science and no current or past expert advocates it nor promotes it.

Harry Benjamin's sole aim was to help his patients and over the course of his lifetime he treated close to 2,000 of them. This experience is what allowed him to develop his gender disorientation scale. If you read "The Transsexual Phenomenon" cover to cover you will see no mention of who among his patients was a woman and who wasn't because he was treating dysphoria. Consequently, he ended developing his disorientation scale where hormone therapy and surgery was the required intervention for the most extreme patients (namely types V and VI).

HBS transsexuals however, prefer to believe that gender dysphoria is not graded. Therefore the patients below them on the Benjamim scale who either did not transition fully, lived part time or crossdressed were either perverts or freaks. All of this thinking developping well after Benjamin's death.

Why do some of them believe this? because in the absence of this tenet, they believe their whole legitimacy as women might be called into question somehow. I don't entirely follow the logic myself but this is what some believe. They alone are suffering from a complete psychosexual inversion while the rest of tbe pack are men in dresses.

The work by Ray Blanchard seemed to help their cause at first because the Autogynephelia concept seemed to support the idea that gynephilic dysphoric men were driven by an erotic impulse to become facsimiles of women but then he also had to theorize that his androphilic patients were simply homosexual men looking for heterosexual male partners. Therefore his work could not be espoused either. For Blanchard all transsexuals are men.

This blog supports now and always has supported transitions for people who need them. It does not support crackpot theories by frustrated transsexuals who need to validate themselves by disparaging others.

HBS trannsexuals are all but completely discredited now but you will still find the odd fringe blog out there in cyberspace.

Comments

  1. You make some excellent points, Joanna, and have persuaded me to buy a copy of Anne Vitale (whom others have also recommended). I notice that Anne Lawrence's book contains only two fleeting references to Benjamin in 240 pages, which tells us a lot about where she's coming from! I've added your site to the 'blog roll' on my own blog, so I can keep up with your thoughts. D

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you for your feedback Dabrela!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

looking past cross gender arousal

Jack’s latest Crossdreamers post got me thinking about cross gender arousal and how it could be avoided; also whether it even matters. This with particular focus on the inability to relate of someone on the outside looking in.

You see, sexuality is a very complicated thing to begin with and when you then add gender identity ambiguity it becomes a recipe to really confuse someone.

So imagine that you are a little boy who identifies as a girl but then along comes puberty and short circuits everything by having the sex you identify with also be the sex you are attracted to. For in essence this is what happens to all all male to female gender dysphoric trans persons who are attracted to women.

So I ask myself: can I imagine a scenario where this inherent contradiction would not produce sexual confusion? The answer is that I cannot.

I am in the unique position, like many of you, to have experienced an early identification with the feminine become sexualized later on. This brought confusion…

understanding the erotic component

I have written about crossed wires before in two separate posts. The idea is that one cannot pass through puberty and the development of sexual feelings for females and not have your pre-existing gender dysphoria be impacted through your psychosexual development. The hormone responsible for your libido is testosterone which is present in much stronger concentration in males and is why gynephilics are most likely to experience erotic overtones as the conflict between romantic external feelings and their pull towards the feminine become permanently intertwined.

Because I came from a deeply religious family where sex was not discussed much at all, I grew up with little access to information and was very much ignorant of matters relating to the subject. With no firsthand experience in intercourse until I married I was then faced with the reality that my ability to perform sexually had been deeply impacted by my dysphoric feelings. This began years of turmoil and self-deprecating thoughts …

a blending

An interesting thing is happening to me: as I have fully embraced being transgender my male and female anima are becoming blended. The female side is no longer an unwelcome appendage which, as a result, has allowed me to craft a more genuine and happier male image.

I dress when I want to and sometimes I cut outings shorter than before. I am my own master in this regard and feel in control.

Don't get me wrong in that the dysphoria is not going away and is sometimes like a wild stallion that threatens to jump the fence but I have learnt to understand it’s demands after all these years hence a transition for me is definitely not in the cards. At this point I am not even foreseeing a social one.

The two sides are no longer in conflict and they are now intertwined to create a fusion that is unique to me. That answer finally came when I reached a full level of self assurance about who I am and learned to embrace that I am trans and yes, that includes my dysphoria's erotic undertones…