Skip to main content

A genetic tracer?

Back in 2009, an Australian study (the largest ever undertaken) on transsexualism was conducted which tried to see if there were genetic links to the condition. The researchers looked specifically at androgen receptor (AR), estrogen receptor (ERB) and aromatase (CYP19) genes for evidence.

The main function of the androgen AR receptor is as a DNA-binding transcription factor that regulates gene expression; however, the androgen receptor has other functions as well. Androgen regulated genes are critical for the development and maintenance of the male sexual phenotype.

The study group included 112 male to female transsexuals and 258 non-transsexual males and associations in repeat lengths of the aforementioned genes were examined.

The conclusion found was that the transsexual group showed longer repeat lengths of the AR gene than the non-transsexual group with no association for transsexualism found in the EB or CYP19 genes. No links to the interaction between the three sets of genes and transsexualism were found. Therefore the only link to the condition was the androgen receptor.

The researchers found that the reduced androgen signalling might contribute to a female gender identity in male to female transsexuals. The longer repeat lengths signified a reduced binding ability with a protein co-activator which was responsible for testosterone signalling in the brain.

Females lack the testosterone surge and so their AR gene is not activated. The report concludes that it is possible that the reduced testosterone levels during development could result in incomplete masculinisation and thus a partially or fully feminised brain.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

prejudice disguised as objective rectitude

So here is Professor Jordan Peterson perhaps justly calling out the excesses of political correctness gone mad. But then he extends it to not indulging transgender people the basic dignity of being addressed in their preferred pronoun. To do so for him would cost nothing and to stand on literal principle seems to serve little use other than to send a message of disdain.

If you have transitioned or even live as the opposite gender is costs me nothing to address you in your preferred pronouns. What difference does it make to me and what am I trying to tell you when I don't?

Peterson wants to stand on his rights to call reality what it is except that in this case the exact objective escapes me. But of course the right wing Federalist is in love with him because he calls a spade a spade.

If I see a rock I can call it that but then the rock doesn’t have any feelings. To address a transgender woman "her" and "she" is not undermining my rights as a person in any way b…

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.

the pseudoscience behind gender dysphoria

The real science as to what causes gender dysphoria still awaits.

Harry Benjamin was on to something except he didn’t have the scientific evidence to back up his suspicions hence, like a true scientist, he negated to draw conclusions. His hunch, based on treating so many patients over his lifetime, was that one is born with a predisposition to be gender dysphoric.

However, with inconclusive brain scans and no DNA marker (as of yet) we are left with believing the word of people who need help and only want to lead happy and productive lives.

The best we have been able to muster since Benjamin's death in 1986 was to amass statistics on who gets a boner imagining themselves as a woman which is in equal parts pathetic and disappointing. For this is not really science at all but is instead playing with interview data that doesn't point to anything definitive or conclusive. I have dealt with this problem at great length in my blog.

The whole thing started with Kurt Freund's obses…