Skip to main content

The new transparency

I try to focus quite a lot here on the science (or lack thereof) which might explain the transgender condition because it matters more than some of us might like to think.

Even if the newer generations of transgender people are prouder and more transparent about their identity, they might not realize that the scientific and psychiatric communities see them a little differently than they see themselves.

I have not made a secret here of saying that perhaps gender variance may be rooted in mental illness but not in a way that means that the person is not lucid or is crazy. I am making more of a comparison with conditions like chronic depression, OCD or even schizophrenia all of which are rooted in biology but yet form part of technically abnormal conditions of the brain.

I pointed recently to the 2009 Australian study which concluded that there could very well be a genetic tracer to gender variance if the brain were not sufficiently masculinised at birth. This would then technically be a genetic abnormality which would just form part of the myriad of mutations that we observe in nature. If we were to conclusively be able to settle on such an explanation it would go a long way towards further advancing the cause of people who don’t fit the mould when it comes to gender expression and identity.

Right now that science vacuum is allowing people who see this more as self propelled mental illness or even as a lifestyle choice free reign to opine without trepidation. There is enough doubt about the origins of this condition that permits this sort of speculation.

Acceptance by society is coming regardless and there are enough well-spoken and highly intellectual spokespersons for the community that help dispel the idea that this is all rooted in delusion. But then there are other targets that are considerably easier to hit. Just because we share a condition does not mean we are all the same.

People attack what they fear and what makes them feel uncomfortable.

In past decades transsexual women would attempt to go stealth and meld into the background as much as possible but with the new higher visibility and outspoken advocates we are seeing equal bravery on the part of detractors that would see them discredited.

The generation that created Casa Susana is now dead and buried and the former secretive underworld of gender variance has been morphed into the daily transparency of a YouTube posting which is both good and bad.

In an age of instant everything where people post their everyday mundane on the internet, I suppose I shouldn’t be too surprised.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.

the pseudoscience behind gender dysphoria

The real science as to what causes gender dysphoria still awaits.

Harry Benjamin was on to something except he didn’t have the scientific evidence to back up his suspicions hence, like a true scientist, he negated to draw conclusions. His hunch, based on treating so many patients over his lifetime, was that one is born with a predisposition to be gender dysphoric.

However, with inconclusive brain scans and no DNA marker (as of yet) we are left with believing the word of people who need help and only want to lead happy and productive lives.

The best we have been able to muster since Benjamin's death in 1986 was to amass statistics on who gets a boner imagining themselves as a woman which is in equal parts pathetic and disappointing. For this is not really science at all but is instead playing with interview data that doesn't point to anything definitive or conclusive. I have dealt with this problem at great length in my blog.

The whole thing started with Kurt Freund's obses…

looking past cross gender arousal

Jack’s latest Crossdreamers post got me thinking about cross gender arousal and how it could be avoided; also whether it even matters. This with particular focus on the inability to relate of someone on the outside looking in.

You see, sexuality is a very complicated thing to begin with and when you then add gender identity ambiguity it becomes a recipe to really confuse someone.

So imagine that you are a little boy who identifies as a girl but then along comes puberty and short circuits everything by having the sex you identify with also be the sex you are attracted to. For in essence this is what happens to all all male to female gender dysphoric trans persons who are attracted to women.

So I ask myself: can I imagine a scenario where this inherent contradiction would not produce sexual confusion? The answer is that I cannot.

I am in the unique position, like many of you, to have experienced an early identification with the feminine become sexualized later on. This brought confusion…