Skip to main content

Alice Dreger

Monica sent me a link to Alice Dreger’s webpage where she answers questions about Ray Blanchard’s Autogynephilia theory. I thought I would comment on it.

In the text Dreger mentions that AGP denotes being sexually aroused by the idea of being or becoming a woman but also later states the following:

“a “philia” is by definition just a sexual orientation. I think which ones count as pathological is ultimately a social definition. Some have tried to argue that any philia that couldn’t lead to procreation is pathological. You can make that argument, but I think it is a social argument, as is true with so much of disease categorization in medicine, necessarily”

Well right off the bat we have a problem because if one’s orientation is towards oneself then why is a gynephilic gender dysphoric interested not only in women sexually but also in marrying and having children?

To answer my own question: it’s because gender dysphoria competes with normal sexuality instead of being an orientation in its own right. In other words we are back to the idea that gender variance does not equal sexual orientation.

This blog is on the record repeatedly at stating that the work of BBL (Blanchard, Bailey and Lawrence) is not really science but more a kind of pseudo science based on categorizing and inventing terms to describe things we have observed for many decades. True science would be the understanding the how and why something happens and no one has been able to do that to date.

This past Sunday morning I was listening to CBC radio which, to my pleasant surprise, was dealing with the topic of the transgender condition and the Caitlin Jenner phenomenon. The commentator wisely stated that although we do not have scientific proof, the sheer numbers and the insistence of people suffering from it speak volumes about its authenticity. Therefore it must be dealt with regardless of the lack of empirical evidence.

It’s unfortunate that, with the exception of Anne Lawrence, the people pontificating that the BBL work is correct have no personal experience with gender dysphoria to speak of. Anne herself seems to have a checkered series of incidents which have led to some people in the community to see her as a body modification fetishist rather than a true transsexual. Some have offered that it is a certain form of guilt that has driven her to wholeheartedly accept the diagnosis of her mentor Blanchard as applying to her.

Blanchard’s separation into two distinct groups of either a) the sissy boy who becomes woman or b) the self loving pervert who becomes woman has become his legacy. I use these derogatory terms because the language contained in his work and in the work of Bailey borders at times on the offensive; something which was noticeably absent in the work of Harry Benjamin.

Dreger does not mind if you use the women's bathroom next to her which is actually very nice for someone who thinks the transgender condition is a form of mental illness.

Regardless, I don’t care about whether she thinks someone is or isn’t a woman. I care about the subject of gender dysphoria and how it happens and on that front Alice Dreger’s webpage does absolutely nothing to advance our knowledge nor elevate the discussion.

For those interested, the page can be found here.







Comments

Popular posts from this blog

prejudice disguised as objective rectitude

So here is Professor Jordan Peterson perhaps justly calling out the excesses of political correctness gone mad. But then he extends it to not indulging transgender people the basic dignity of being addressed in their preferred pronoun. To do so for him would cost nothing and to stand on literal principle seems to serve little use other than to send a message of disdain.

If you have transitioned or even live as the opposite gender is costs me nothing to address you in your preferred pronouns. What difference does it make to me and what am I trying to tell you when I don't?

Peterson wants to stand on his rights to call reality what it is except that in this case the exact objective escapes me. But of course the right wing Federalist is in love with him because he calls a spade a spade.

If I see a rock I can call it that but then the rock doesn’t have any feelings. To address a transgender woman "her" and "she" is not undermining my rights as a person in any way b…

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.

the pseudoscience behind gender dysphoria

The real science as to what causes gender dysphoria still awaits.

Harry Benjamin was on to something except he didn’t have the scientific evidence to back up his suspicions hence, like a true scientist, he negated to draw conclusions. His hunch, based on treating so many patients over his lifetime, was that one is born with a predisposition to be gender dysphoric.

However, with inconclusive brain scans and no DNA marker (as of yet) we are left with believing the word of people who need help and only want to lead happy and productive lives.

The best we have been able to muster since Benjamin's death in 1986 was to amass statistics on who gets a boner imagining themselves as a woman which is in equal parts pathetic and disappointing. For this is not really science at all but is instead playing with interview data that doesn't point to anything definitive or conclusive. I have dealt with this problem at great length in my blog.

The whole thing started with Kurt Freund's obses…