Skip to main content

Game face

It’s not about clothes but in part it is.

The interesting thing is that presenting as Joanna makes it easier for me to express myself in a way that is quite foreign to the way I normally do. N brought this up to me the other day by asking me if my male persona was a fabrication to draw attention away from my transgender nature and, although I answered quickly that it was not, perhaps I was a bit rash.

I think we all learn to develop a game face that serves us well. Our true selves are not really out there for everyone to see but more a modified version that gets us through the daily routine without needing to think too much. The rest is left to our most private and inner most thoughts because truly being yourself would mean being vulnerable to a point that society is far from being ready for.

We learn this lesson early on in life when an innocent slip of the tongue is met with jeers and ridicule and it humiliates us into silence. Hence forth begins the development of a shield that allows us to conform so that we are not made fun of again.

Transgender people have to work particularly hard at this because we need to hide all traces that might raise suspicion there is something different about us. That mask tends to gel and become a default and fallback position.

When I go out, my clothing choice reflects my taste if I was a woman and I don’t think it would change much if I were to transition (which I have no intention of doing by the way). The only thing that would change is when I got home I would change into women’s shorts and tops instead of into men’s but that is a small difference. The earrings might stay on and the makeup would still come off. Would I still be the same person? Yes I most certainly would be.

But this is also why a change of plumbing or hormone intake is not in the works for me because I can honour my insides with a method that works well now. I won’t mess with it.

Gender is such a fragile thing that we don’t even know how to define it. Most people just think that it relates directly to biological sex but of course they would be wrong. It’s about how a person feels comfortable acting and presenting which, when it conflicts with accepted convention, is then to be frowned upon.

That rigid convention is breaking down slowly and transgender people are going to start filling that new ground with their own sense of themselves. Its behaviour, style of dress and conversational style all rolled into one and yet so much more that it can hardly be put into words.

The best descriptor is just being you.

Comments

  1. Excellent points. I count myself as fortunate in many ways. I am at a point where I am comfortable with myself regardless of my clothes. Being able to dress on occasion and get out (while not as completely and as often as I think I may want) is helpful in allowing me to realize that I am one whole and disticnt person with different manifestations.
    Pat

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

prejudice disguised as objective rectitude

So here is Professor Jordan Peterson perhaps justly calling out the excesses of political correctness gone mad. But then he extends it to not indulging transgender people the basic dignity of being addressed in their preferred pronoun. To do so for him would cost nothing and to stand on literal principle seems to serve little use other than to send a message of disdain.

If you have transitioned or even live as the opposite gender is costs me nothing to address you in your preferred pronouns. What difference does it make to me and what am I trying to tell you when I don't?

Peterson wants to stand on his rights to call reality what it is except that in this case the exact objective escapes me. But of course the right wing Federalist is in love with him because he calls a spade a spade.

If I see a rock I can call it that but then the rock doesn’t have any feelings. To address a transgender woman "her" and "she" is not undermining my rights as a person in any way b…

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.

the pseudoscience behind gender dysphoria

The real science as to what causes gender dysphoria still awaits.

Harry Benjamin was on to something except he didn’t have the scientific evidence to back up his suspicions hence, like a true scientist, he negated to draw conclusions. His hunch, based on treating so many patients over his lifetime, was that one is born with a predisposition to be gender dysphoric.

However, with inconclusive brain scans and no DNA marker (as of yet) we are left with believing the word of people who need help and only want to lead happy and productive lives.

The best we have been able to muster since Benjamin's death in 1986 was to amass statistics on who gets a boner imagining themselves as a woman which is in equal parts pathetic and disappointing. For this is not really science at all but is instead playing with interview data that doesn't point to anything definitive or conclusive. I have dealt with this problem at great length in my blog.

The whole thing started with Kurt Freund's obses…