Skip to main content

an interesting series

There is a series of videos on YouTube by Transline Hollywood that I find interesting. They focus on specific issues facing transgender people and is hosted by a genetic woman who, most of the time, interviews Suzanne - a transgender male to female who lives part time as a woman.

One particular video which caught my attention dealt with the subject of transgender dating. The guest on that segment was a transitioned woman named Leigh who looked to be in her late fifties. In her previous life she had been living as a gay man.

If you watch the video you will see Leigh explain that she transitioned in her early fifties which is somewhat unusual for an androphilic transgender woman. She states in the video knew she felt she was a female very early on and told her parents but after being counselled against it by a therapist, she decided to continue living her life as a man.

Contrast Leigh with Suzanne who was married twice to women who knew about her transgender nature.

Leigh is now married to a man and living as the woman she always felt she was. She is an example of how we can be talked out of things by a therapist who may or may know how to deal with transgender individuals. Of course the opposite can also happen in that we can be talked into entering into a transition process that may ultimately not be for us.

I find the series enlightens and deals with the topic in a light but informative fashion and can serve to educate people who may know little to nothing about the subject. Here is a link to the video....


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pT96jlClJ8









Comments

  1. Thanks so much Joanna! What a great team of ladies, giving the straight goods, especially for those of us who are mature and need to remember we aren't teenagers, even though we feel that way.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

prejudice disguised as objective rectitude

So here is Professor Jordan Peterson perhaps justly calling out the excesses of political correctness gone mad. But then he extends it to not indulging transgender people the basic dignity of being addressed in their preferred pronoun. To do so for him would cost nothing and to stand on literal principle seems to serve little use other than to send a message of disdain.

If you have transitioned or even live as the opposite gender is costs me nothing to address you in your preferred pronouns. What difference does it make to me and what am I trying to tell you when I don't?

Peterson wants to stand on his rights to call reality what it is except that in this case the exact objective escapes me. But of course the right wing Federalist is in love with him because he calls a spade a spade.

If I see a rock I can call it that but then the rock doesn’t have any feelings. To address a transgender woman "her" and "she" is not undermining my rights as a person in any way b…

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.

the pseudoscience behind gender dysphoria

The real science as to what causes gender dysphoria still awaits.

Harry Benjamin was on to something except he didn’t have the scientific evidence to back up his suspicions hence, like a true scientist, he negated to draw conclusions. His hunch, based on treating so many patients over his lifetime, was that one is born with a predisposition to be gender dysphoric.

However, with inconclusive brain scans and no DNA marker (as of yet) we are left with believing the word of people who need help and only want to lead happy and productive lives.

The best we have been able to muster since Benjamin's death in 1986 was to amass statistics on who gets a boner imagining themselves as a woman which is in equal parts pathetic and disappointing. For this is not really science at all but is instead playing with interview data that doesn't point to anything definitive or conclusive. I have dealt with this problem at great length in my blog.

The whole thing started with Kurt Freund's obses…