Skip to main content

just a wee bit of irony

I can see how Ellen DeGeneres might have been perplexed.

There was Ellen interviewing Caitlyn Jenner on her show and out comes a comment on gay marriage and how Jenner is more of a traditional values kind of person. I could just feel DeGeneres holding back an ironic expression.

This former man who now identified as a woman was making a judgment on an issue that society has less difficulty with than the idea of a gender role transition.

Being older and identifying as a Republican naturally suggest that she espouses traditional family values except that a gender role transition is not high on the list of red state bible thumping folk some of whom might think she is an abomination before God.

This was a failed opportunity for Jenner to show some understanding about how gender identity and orientation when differing from the norm can expose people to needless suffering and discrimination


  1. What I would like to know, though, is to what extent the fact that Jenner expresses conservative values lowers the threshold for acceptance in American traditionalists circles.

    I have gay friends who despair about the increasing traditionalism in the LGBT community, arguing that the focus on marriage has undermined the radical and liberating aspects of gay culture. I think they are right about this, but it is also clear that gay and lesbian presenting as "regular folks" have made many straight people less afraid of them. They have become humanized in the eyes of the homophobic, and I suspect Jenner may make trans less threatening in the eyes of many transphobic people.

  2. Jack I agree that be expressing a conservative idea in her new "wrapping" it may endear her to people who might have otherwise thought that trans meant "freak" but she has not impressing me with some of her glib statements thus far and clearly bothered Ellen enough to have her bring up the issue with Howard Stern on his radio show. It just seems odd to not see how your own situation is even more radical in the eyes of many and the fact she doesn't seem to notice that does not inspire confidence.

  3. It seems that much of the intolerace towards Jenner is coming from the left. It seems that the left resents the fact that anyone who is gay or trans could be a conservative Republican. This is similar to the pressure that those on the left put on blacks and Latinos to support the Democratic party.
    We often hear in the T community that gender identity and sexuality are separate issues. Someone who is T may prefer a male or a female as a sexual partner just like someone who is not T. Why do many on the left question a T person whose political leanings are not in line with liberal orthodoxy? Why do the left want to presume that anyone who is any part of LGBT want bigger government, more socialism, higher taxes, abortion on demand or any number of left wing causes. To me it seems like a very un-liberal and intolerant way of looking at things.

  4. Pat this is not about government issues its about social tolerance and since the Republican party has become (for better of for worse) the party of family values, we often see much more intolerance coming from them than from Democrats who tend to be more inclusive. It makes little sense to me to be against gay marriage but be for transgender recognition. Surely they are both human tolerance and recognition issues.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

prejudice disguised as objective rectitude

So here is Professor Jordan Peterson perhaps justly calling out the excesses of political correctness gone mad. But then he extends it to not indulging transgender people the basic dignity of being addressed in their preferred pronoun. To do so for him would cost nothing and to stand on literal principle seems to serve little use other than to send a message of disdain.

If you have transitioned or even live as the opposite gender is costs me nothing to address you in your preferred pronouns. What difference does it make to me and what am I trying to tell you when I don't?

Peterson wants to stand on his rights to call reality what it is except that in this case the exact objective escapes me. But of course the right wing Federalist is in love with him because he calls a spade a spade.

If I see a rock I can call it that but then the rock doesn’t have any feelings. To address a transgender woman "her" and "she" is not undermining my rights as a person in any way b…

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.

the pseudoscience behind gender dysphoria

The real science as to what causes gender dysphoria still awaits.

Harry Benjamin was on to something except he didn’t have the scientific evidence to back up his suspicions hence, like a true scientist, he negated to draw conclusions. His hunch, based on treating so many patients over his lifetime, was that one is born with a predisposition to be gender dysphoric.

However, with inconclusive brain scans and no DNA marker (as of yet) we are left with believing the word of people who need help and only want to lead happy and productive lives.

The best we have been able to muster since Benjamin's death in 1986 was to amass statistics on who gets a boner imagining themselves as a woman which is in equal parts pathetic and disappointing. For this is not really science at all but is instead playing with interview data that doesn't point to anything definitive or conclusive. I have dealt with this problem at great length in my blog.

The whole thing started with Kurt Freund's obses…