Skip to main content

Anne Vitale responds

Before I get to my correspondence with Anne Vitale, some of you may be wondering why this blog focuses so heavily on the science (or lack thereof) on the subject of transgenderism. The answer is simple:

• I have a natural curiosity and a rational mind
• I suffered tremendously as a child and then as an adult at the hands of an ignorant and stupid society

As a result I have little patience for insufferable windbags, people elevating their own agendas at the expense of others and pseudo-scientific bullshit.

My recent posts have focused a lot on AGP which is one of the biggest shams I have ever read up extensively on. Only in a practice like psychology could it so possible to be so intellectually lazy and allow people like Blanchard to get away with what he was doing for so long.

On a practical level it changes nothing because his quackery is being circumvented through the introduction of public policies that help transgender people lead better lives. A large number of them probably don’t know who Blanchard is and he will likely disappear into history as just another purveyor of radical and unproven concepts such as phrenology.

The leading institution for transsexual and transgender care (WPATH) completely disregards his work and so do the leading transgender philosophers.

Still this blip in history should serve as a cautionary tale about what can happen when no one was minding the store. The vacuum left after all those years of work by Harry Benjamin was able to be filled with a man with supreme arrogance, intellectual laziness and preconceived bias with absolutely not one shred of actual scientific evidence to back him up.

Despite all this, his ideas ended up being accepted and used. How could this happen? because fundamentally there are still huge gaps in our understanding of human sexuality, gender and the human brain. The area is just ripe for conjecture.

I wanted to get Anne Vitale's take on AGP and contacted her recently. Here is an excerpt from my email followed by her response to that specific excerpt:

JS:"..to give something a scientific name and then have no conclusive proof of where the desire to be female comes from is what I find troubling about it. I have read all of Blanchard and Lawrence and have come to dismiss their work as pseudoscience if for no other reason than it is not actually provable."

AV: "Your statement above is the reason Blanchard's theory of autogynephilia is not generally accepted as the root cause of gender dysphoria (even in MTF's where it is the only place where it can even be considered to be a factor). Even though autogynephila is common in MTF individuals, many of us think that it is a way for some MTFs to alleviate the GD rather than have it be --as Blanchard and Lawrence claim-- the engine that brings on the condition and then by stint of regular masturbation,  encourage it and drive folks to transition. There are  many other reasons to believe that autogynephilia is no big deal and  plays only a minor role in MTF transsexualism"



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

prejudice disguised as objective rectitude

So here is Professor Jordan Peterson perhaps justly calling out the excesses of political correctness gone mad. But then he extends it to not indulging transgender people the basic dignity of being addressed in their preferred pronoun. To do so for him would cost nothing and to stand on literal principle seems to serve little use other than to send a message of disdain.

If you have transitioned or even live as the opposite gender is costs me nothing to address you in your preferred pronouns. What difference does it make to me and what am I trying to tell you when I don't?

Peterson wants to stand on his rights to call reality what it is except that in this case the exact objective escapes me. But of course the right wing Federalist is in love with him because he calls a spade a spade.

If I see a rock I can call it that but then the rock doesn’t have any feelings. To address a transgender woman "her" and "she" is not undermining my rights as a person in any way b…

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.

the pseudoscience behind gender dysphoria

The real science as to what causes gender dysphoria still awaits.

Harry Benjamin was on to something except he didn’t have the scientific evidence to back up his suspicions hence, like a true scientist, he negated to draw conclusions. His hunch, based on treating so many patients over his lifetime, was that one is born with a predisposition to be gender dysphoric.

However, with inconclusive brain scans and no DNA marker (as of yet) we are left with believing the word of people who need help and only want to lead happy and productive lives.

The best we have been able to muster since Benjamin's death in 1986 was to amass statistics on who gets a boner imagining themselves as a woman which is in equal parts pathetic and disappointing. For this is not really science at all but is instead playing with interview data that doesn't point to anything definitive or conclusive. I have dealt with this problem at great length in my blog.

The whole thing started with Kurt Freund's obses…