Skip to main content

Blanchard and his posse....

Consider how stupid the Blanchard school must think the public is that they stand steadfast in their attempts to label his work as being actual science. The last time I checked, science was based on theories supported by verifiable evidence.

Psychiatry, if not a pure science, at least employs scientific methods to treat known conditions with a combination of counseling and pharmacology. Examples would be things like schizophrenia or clinical depression.

Contrast this with the invented condition known as Autogynephilia which is supposedly diagnosed through an extensive interview process which looks for evidence based on a preconceived notion by the researcher. Any claims by the patient that don't fit the theory (such as any prepubescent history of gender confusion) are simply dismissed as lying.

To illustrate my point, let's use the example of polling which isn't about science per se but which uses scientific rigor to make sure the process is unbiased and consistent. A poll typically might ask simple questions about voter intention: are you voting for candidate A or B. However even those simple polls can be wrong if the voter then changes their mind later on.

What would be your impetus for lying in a simple poll? Probably nill.

Now what would be your impetus for lying when you are going for gender treatment and hoping to sweet Jesus that you're not a transsexual? I would argue that its infinitely less. I know I wanted the hospital gender clinic I was being treated at to tell me I was going to be cured and hence I bared my soul to my therapist.

Now imagine Blanchard the pollster doing an in depth interview with you at the end of which he comes up with a convoluted and unproven theory using your verbal input about something as complex as your sexual habits, your perceived gender identity and your sexual orientation. If I had gone to the CAMH for treatment, Blanchard would already have made up his mind about me because he had a predetermined idea to prove. If my responses did not fit expectation I would be accused of lying.

Consider therefore the following questions:

- How is it possible that people all over the world who have never met each other consistently report the same type of history and insistence that there is an incongruity between their birth sex and their gender early on in life? Even well before the existence of the internet and the proliferation of information via mass media?

- If dysphoria is all about sexual arousal, why are gender dysphorics aware of this issue issue well before puberty and why does Blanchard negate this evidence?

- Why did Blanchard categorize transsexuals into two groups; not successfully explain why they feel they way they do and then proceed to invent bogus terminology that explains nothing?

Pretty fundamental stuff but questions which Blanchard fails spectacularly at addressing. We wont even discuss female to male transsexualism which he pretty much ignores.

This is a man whose mentor, Kurt Freund, specialized in measuring the sexual arousal patterns of sex offenders. All of a sudden Blanchard begins a career in treating gender dysphorics at the CAMH and then goes about using the same methodology? Its almost mind bogglingly disturbing.

This piece of pseudoscience has been seized upon both by radical feminists and old school transsexuals. The former to denigrate people who transition as perverted psychos and by the latter to separate the "fake" transsexuals from the "real" ones. Neither position is reality based mind you but Blanchard has helped each faction elevate their agendas in their own minds.

When I began my quest for self understanding through researching the published literature I read Blanchard's work among others. However, to accept this type of work as science would be ignoring every basic principle I have ever been taught about scientific validation.

Harry Benjamin (very much the scientist) stopped short of making stupid conjectures because he understood he lacked the scientific evidence to do so. Therefore he did the only thing possible: he categorized his patients based on the level of gender disorientation they experienced and graded them on a scale. Thankfully Anne Vitale (who I featured in my previous post) continues his good work.

Transgender people need to understand that there are mean-spirted and arrogant people out there doing shoddy science. When it falls into the hands of lawmakers and public officials it can greatly impact the quality of our lives and our rights as individuals.

This is why its important to be on the lookout and to be informed. Below is the cast of characters to be mindful of.


Bailey
Dreger
Lawrence
Blanchard

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.

the pseudoscience behind gender dysphoria

The real science as to what causes gender dysphoria still awaits.

Harry Benjamin was on to something except he didn’t have the scientific evidence to back up his suspicions hence, like a true scientist, he negated to draw conclusions. His hunch, based on treating so many patients over his lifetime, was that one is born with a predisposition to be gender dysphoric.

However, with inconclusive brain scans and no DNA marker (as of yet) we are left with believing the word of people who need help and only want to lead happy and productive lives.

The best we have been able to muster since Benjamin's death in 1986 was to amass statistics on who gets a boner imagining themselves as a woman which is in equal parts pathetic and disappointing. For this is not really science at all but is instead playing with interview data that doesn't point to anything definitive or conclusive. I have dealt with this problem at great length in my blog.

The whole thing started with Kurt Freund's obses…

looking past cross gender arousal

Jack’s latest Crossdreamers post got me thinking about cross gender arousal and how it could be avoided; also whether it even matters. This with particular focus on the inability to relate of someone on the outside looking in.

You see, sexuality is a very complicated thing to begin with and when you then add gender identity ambiguity it becomes a recipe to really confuse someone.

So imagine that you are a little boy who identifies as a girl but then along comes puberty and short circuits everything by having the sex you identify with also be the sex you are attracted to. For in essence this is what happens to all all male to female gender dysphoric trans persons who are attracted to women.

So I ask myself: can I imagine a scenario where this inherent contradiction would not produce sexual confusion? The answer is that I cannot.

I am in the unique position, like many of you, to have experienced an early identification with the feminine become sexualized later on. This brought confusion…