Skip to main content

polarization

People who lean to the right either politically, religiously or both seem to be declaring war on what they term the transgender agenda. Periodicals like the Federalist are featuring stories which denounce the delusion of this group of mental defectives who want to destroy our family values and invite strange perverted men into women’s spaces.

To quote a recent article:

"We have officially stepped off the precipice of reality and are in a postmodern sexual identity politics free-fall. More postmodern indoctrination into imagining a male sexual fetish is really “just like civil rights,” People says. Has anyone ever seen a 68-year-old woman discuss “dating” in a national magazine? No. So why do people buy into this?

The sexual identity crowd is doing what they called in the 1960s a mind game. According to the transgender lobby, sex and gender are way different—completely different. And in the new world order, the more confused you stay, the better for media-generated propaganda campaigns"


This is an unfortunate but expected backlash from a sector of society that would not have transgender people gain any acceptance. If you wanted to know why Blanchard and his group were dangerous you can see how they have found their captive audience. I don't need to tell you that the author of the article I just quoted does not suffer from gender dysphoria.

As a person who was raised and educated in a conservative (socially not politically) and religious environment I can somewhat relate to the way these people think because in some respects I shared their views. I used to believe in a more black and white version of existence. But I’ve since grown up.

Nobody in their right mind would choose to be this way on purpose; absolutely no one. Yet these right wing periodicals would have you believe otherwise. They rail against older transitioners as well as the Jazz Jennings of the world for abandoning their male identity presumably deliberately.

My blog has more and more focused on these topics because we are in a dangerous period right now. While one sector of society celebrates our coming out party, others would have us go back into hiding and be treated for mental illness.

Poor Walt Heyer has become The Federalist's poster boy for the repentant transitioner who has found religion and he appeals greatly to those who accept that everyone one of us is just like him; waiting to be treated and then saved.

I despair in some ways for the increasing polarization that has gotten us here. More and more it seems that the right stands for anti-science, anti-progressive and anti-intellectual. Gone are the fiscal conservatives who would only weigh in on financial matters but leave the social wedge issues alone. Many now sit riveted to their televisions and see reality through the prism of Fox News.

The world has become far more polarized than I have ever seen it. The danger being that social issues are far more divisive and passion inducing than issues of fiscal or political reform.

For me it all boils down to lack of empathy and lack of education. Whether some people like it or not, gender is a spectrum and not a fixed binary. The fact that some people’s dysphoria reaches extremes that require they be addressed with a gender role transition should be respected instead of ridiculed.

This is where our lack of science does not help because it leaves the door open for all kinds of opinions from hopelessly obtuse people driven by their own dogma and nothing more.

I never saw this rapid change coming even a few short years ago but perhaps because of it, the reactions from those who despair the world as they know it is coming to an end, have been that much more pronounced and emphatic.

What this is really about at its root is the treatment of gender dysphoria; nothing more and nothing less. If you can do it without transition then you have saved yourself a lot of potential grief. But people on both sides of the issue distort because they want their own version to be the definitive one.

In spite of some obvious flaws on both sides its no contest for me. Its the one that votes for tolerance of something we know very little about and have barely begun to scratch its surface.

Comments

  1. I, too, have shared their views in the past. Sadly it is driven by prejudice, judgment and fear; not what their Savior would have them to be.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dee you are correct. There is very little empathy there...

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.

the pseudoscience behind gender dysphoria

The real science as to what causes gender dysphoria still awaits.

Harry Benjamin was on to something except he didn’t have the scientific evidence to back up his suspicions hence, like a true scientist, he negated to draw conclusions. His hunch, based on treating so many patients over his lifetime, was that one is born with a predisposition to be gender dysphoric.

However, with inconclusive brain scans and no DNA marker (as of yet) we are left with believing the word of people who need help and only want to lead happy and productive lives.

The best we have been able to muster since Benjamin's death in 1986 was to amass statistics on who gets a boner imagining themselves as a woman which is in equal parts pathetic and disappointing. For this is not really science at all but is instead playing with interview data that doesn't point to anything definitive or conclusive. I have dealt with this problem at great length in my blog.

The whole thing started with Kurt Freund's obses…

looking past cross gender arousal

Jack’s latest Crossdreamers post got me thinking about cross gender arousal and how it could be avoided; also whether it even matters. This with particular focus on the inability to relate of someone on the outside looking in.

You see, sexuality is a very complicated thing to begin with and when you then add gender identity ambiguity it becomes a recipe to really confuse someone.

So imagine that you are a little boy who identifies as a girl but then along comes puberty and short circuits everything by having the sex you identify with also be the sex you are attracted to. For in essence this is what happens to all all male to female gender dysphoric trans persons who are attracted to women.

So I ask myself: can I imagine a scenario where this inherent contradiction would not produce sexual confusion? The answer is that I cannot.

I am in the unique position, like many of you, to have experienced an early identification with the feminine become sexualized later on. This brought confusion…