Skip to main content

fair game

Now in its 19th season on the air, South Park pulls no punches in its aim to be irreverent and poke fun at some of the absurdities of our modern culture. However having watched a couple of episodes so far left me thinking that they were perhaps wading a little too far into extremes.

This season features the cartoon rape of a Donald Trump inspired Canadian politician, Eric Cartman being beaten to a pulp by his new principal and a pull no punches depiction of Caitlyn Jenner as a plastic surgery freak show with a penchant for vehicular homicide.

N introduced me to the show some years back and in general have found it witty while remaining just on the edge of good taste with their pull no punches approach.

Both the episodes I saw the other night had me thinking they had gone just a little far this time. The theme of this season appears to be political correctness gone awry leaving us to accept questionable statements as accepted fact lest you be accused of being a bigot.

Not unexpectedly, the subject of Jenner's supposed heroism is taken on as another sacred cow and, while I am on the record as not being a huge fan of hers, her depiction was maybe a questionable call. Perhaps when it comes to this topic I am too myopic because it touches close to home. Other subjects tackled by Parker and Stone have not been quite so personal to me.

I will leave the question of whether Jenner is a role model or not alone and defer that to you. Do we have a right to poke fun at this issue? I believe the answer is yes. However I wouldn't be the person to ask whether the show crosses a limit either because the area of uncensored satire is not an area I would feel comfortable wading into.

Among the episodes I have seen, one of my favorites was the one dealing with racism. Randy appears on Wheel of Fortune and says the unthinkable. I felt that this sacred cow was handled more deftly however and, while racism is widely seen as unacceptable by most educated and reasonable people, being transgender is still seen by a wide margin of the population as a bizarre aberration of choice.

Criticism of Jenner is fine but by virtue of her notoriety some of us will take schrapnel from those who find her representative of us all. But the way Jenner seems to crave publicity and her tendency to commit verbal gaffs has not endeared her to many of us and invites parody.

For Stone and Parker everything is fair game so maybe chalk up my unease to my myopia on this issue.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.

the pseudoscience behind gender dysphoria

The real science as to what causes gender dysphoria still awaits.

Harry Benjamin was on to something except he didn’t have the scientific evidence to back up his suspicions hence, like a true scientist, he negated to draw conclusions. His hunch, based on treating so many patients over his lifetime, was that one is born with a predisposition to be gender dysphoric.

However, with inconclusive brain scans and no DNA marker (as of yet) we are left with believing the word of people who need help and only want to lead happy and productive lives.

The best we have been able to muster since Benjamin's death in 1986 was to amass statistics on who gets a boner imagining themselves as a woman which is in equal parts pathetic and disappointing. For this is not really science at all but is instead playing with interview data that doesn't point to anything definitive or conclusive. I have dealt with this problem at great length in my blog.

The whole thing started with Kurt Freund's obses…

looking past cross gender arousal

Jack’s latest Crossdreamers post got me thinking about cross gender arousal and how it could be avoided; also whether it even matters. This with particular focus on the inability to relate of someone on the outside looking in.

You see, sexuality is a very complicated thing to begin with and when you then add gender identity ambiguity it becomes a recipe to really confuse someone.

So imagine that you are a little boy who identifies as a girl but then along comes puberty and short circuits everything by having the sex you identify with also be the sex you are attracted to. For in essence this is what happens to all all male to female gender dysphoric trans persons who are attracted to women.

So I ask myself: can I imagine a scenario where this inherent contradiction would not produce sexual confusion? The answer is that I cannot.

I am in the unique position, like many of you, to have experienced an early identification with the feminine become sexualized later on. This brought confusion…