Skip to main content

three groups of supporters

The way I see it there are basically three distinct groups of Blanchard and Bailey supporters:

• Gynephilic transsexuals desperately looking for an explanation for the way they are and clinging to whatever they can find
• Androphilic transsexuals who tell themselves: I might be mentally ill but at least I am not a pervert
• Academics (some well-meaning and some not) who don’t have and never will have gender dysphoria but think they have found something solid in his work

Fundamentally the only thing Ray Blanchard has ever done is interview people, categorize them into two groups and then somehow concluded that all transitions are driven by sexual motives. Any stories that did not correlate with his hypothesis were systematically dismissed as lying. He then invented a sexually-fuelled mental illness and called it Autogynephilia.

The best analogy I can find for this scenario is Ron L Hubbard’s invention of his own religion. He calls it Scientology and over a number of decades dupes countless people into believing it is somehow all true.

A curious scientist would go further and examine the following questions:

• If there are indeed two types what are the main differences and where are the areas of overlap if any?
• Where does the arousal component for gynephilics come from, how does it compete with normal heterosexual functioning and how does it influence a decision to transition if at all?
• What are the differences between androphilic and gynephilic pre-transition sexual fantasies
• Why don’t all gynephilics want or need to transition?
• What is the dividing line between a transvestite/crossdresser and a gynephilic transsexual?
• Why don’t all androphilics want to transition and what is the dividing line between an effeminate boy and an androphilic transsexual?
• Is there a possible biological cause for gender dysphoria and what does the latest research tell us?
• If my patients are not lying and they trace their feelings to early childhood what happens to gynephilics during puberty that creates this conflict between perceived identity and normal sexual functioning?

These are questions we actually don’t have answers to but you won’t find this kind of analysis in Blanchard’s writing because he doesn’t want or need to work that hard. The best way to get around this effort is simply tell everyone that the people you are treating are mentally ill and delusional. This saves you the work of having to explain things or look for other possible causes.

Except I don’t know about you but my mind is in perfect working order.


Popular posts from this blog

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.

the pseudoscience behind gender dysphoria

The real science as to what causes gender dysphoria still awaits.

Harry Benjamin was on to something except he didn’t have the scientific evidence to back up his suspicions hence, like a true scientist, he negated to draw conclusions. His hunch, based on treating so many patients over his lifetime, was that one is born with a predisposition to be gender dysphoric.

However, with inconclusive brain scans and no DNA marker (as of yet) we are left with believing the word of people who need help and only want to lead happy and productive lives.

The best we have been able to muster since Benjamin's death in 1986 was to amass statistics on who gets a boner imagining themselves as a woman which is in equal parts pathetic and disappointing. For this is not really science at all but is instead playing with interview data that doesn't point to anything definitive or conclusive. I have dealt with this problem at great length in my blog.

The whole thing started with Kurt Freund's obses…

looking past cross gender arousal

Jack’s latest Crossdreamers post got me thinking about cross gender arousal and how it could be avoided; also whether it even matters. This with particular focus on the inability to relate of someone on the outside looking in.

You see, sexuality is a very complicated thing to begin with and when you then add gender identity ambiguity it becomes a recipe to really confuse someone.

So imagine that you are a little boy who identifies as a girl but then along comes puberty and short circuits everything by having the sex you identify with also be the sex you are attracted to. For in essence this is what happens to all all male to female gender dysphoric trans persons who are attracted to women.

So I ask myself: can I imagine a scenario where this inherent contradiction would not produce sexual confusion? The answer is that I cannot.

I am in the unique position, like many of you, to have experienced an early identification with the feminine become sexualized later on. This brought confusion…