Skip to main content

three groups of supporters

The way I see it there are basically three distinct groups of Blanchard and Bailey supporters:

• Gynephilic transsexuals desperately looking for an explanation for the way they are and clinging to whatever they can find
• Androphilic transsexuals who tell themselves: I might be mentally ill but at least I am not a pervert
• Academics (some well-meaning and some not) who don’t have and never will have gender dysphoria but think they have found something solid in his work

Fundamentally the only thing Ray Blanchard has ever done is interview people, categorize them into two groups and then somehow concluded that all transitions are driven by sexual motives. Any stories that did not correlate with his hypothesis were systematically dismissed as lying. He then invented a sexually-fuelled mental illness and called it Autogynephilia.

The best analogy I can find for this scenario is Ron L Hubbard’s invention of his own religion. He calls it Scientology and over a number of decades dupes countless people into believing it is somehow all true.

A curious scientist would go further and examine the following questions:

• If there are indeed two types what are the main differences and where are the areas of overlap if any?
• Where does the arousal component for gynephilics come from, how does it compete with normal heterosexual functioning and how does it influence a decision to transition if at all?
• What are the differences between androphilic and gynephilic pre-transition sexual fantasies
• Why don’t all gynephilics want or need to transition?
• What is the dividing line between a transvestite/crossdresser and a gynephilic transsexual?
• Why don’t all androphilics want to transition and what is the dividing line between an effeminate boy and an androphilic transsexual?
• Is there a possible biological cause for gender dysphoria and what does the latest research tell us?
• If my patients are not lying and they trace their feelings to early childhood what happens to gynephilics during puberty that creates this conflict between perceived identity and normal sexual functioning?

These are questions we actually don’t have answers to but you won’t find this kind of analysis in Blanchard’s writing because he doesn’t want or need to work that hard. The best way to get around this effort is simply tell everyone that the people you are treating are mentally ill and delusional. This saves you the work of having to explain things or look for other possible causes.

Except I don’t know about you but my mind is in perfect working order.


Popular posts from this blog

how times change

How times have changed.

Whereas transition was something not to even contemplate for us, here is a young trans person who felt the opposite pressure. She looks and sounds extremely passable but decided it wasn't for her despite the social media presence of young transitioners potentially inspiring her to.

We are all different and I happen to think she's rather a smart cookie as well...


As transgender people, organized religion hasn't really been our friend however on the other hand it has often had little to do with true spirituality. I needed to learn this over time and much of what I was taught growing up was steeped in the judgmental superstition of society instead of what some creator would demand of me.

Regardless of your belief system, you are a child of the universe and have been endowed with uniqueness and goodness of spirit. You have probably never wished anyone ill will and you have tried your best to live within the absurd coordinate system of humanity. Yet somehow belonging to the LGBT community was entirely your fault.

As I have grown older this inherent irrationality became increasingly evident to me. I knew I was a fundamentally good person and yet I was different in a way which was not of my choosing. Hence with this comprehension my self appreciation and esteem grew in proportion.

Religion for me today seems forever trapped in the misinterpretat…

let's please read carefully

This post is prompted by a recent comment I received to one of my older posts and I wanted to address it.

I used to wonder why some transgender people accepted Blanchard’s work until I think I figured out why: they may not have examined it closely enough. They would experience cross gender arousal and then accept it was Autogynephilia without properly understanding what the term meant and what the theory said: it is an invented sexual “illness” which makes people transition. In other words, it is the arousal itself which causes this desire and not a pre-existing gender identity which does not align with birth sex. Of course, Blanchard has no explanation for the origin of his proposed “illness” only that it is a form of sexual deviance.

My counter proposal? we transition despite this arousal. In other words, the transgender identity is pre-existing and the arousal is the result of the mismatching of burgeoning sexual feelings towards females and this misaligned identity; it is not per…