Skip to main content

another analogy

Science is based on facts backed up with concrete and experimentally verifiable evidence.

The Autogynephilia theory states that the presence of arousal to their own image as females in gender dysphoric men is the main cause of their desire to transition. The problem is that I could just as easily counteract this proposal by saying that the presence of arousal is part and parcel of a bigger and more complex picture and instantly arrive at a stalemate because no further evidence could be put forth substantiating the original claim.

Further complicating matters is that not everyone who experiences arousal chooses or even desires transition. Remember that its not whether the arousal is there or not but more about attributing your entire motivation to it.

Allow me to illustrate with an analogy:

Suppose you associated rain with directly being the cause of lightning and thunder. After all we frequently see them together and could be forgiven for assuming a direct causal correlation. In actual fact we know they are often accompanying elements of a complex equation that happens in the atmosphere. We know that we often have lightning and thunder with rain but we also know that rain can exist without either. In rare cases you can have lightning and thunder without any accompanying rain.

See the point?

In a great leap, Blanchard has made a direct cause and effect correlation between two things in an area where we have even less scientific information than in the field of meteorology and added insult to injury by basing his conclusion exclusively on interviews where the masturbatory habits of pre-transition transsexuals were thoroughly documented and scrutinized.

When was the last time you heard about conclusive scientific findings being based on interviews? If by now I have not succeeded in putting doubts in your mind about this theory being scientific then probably nothing will.

In reality, the only way to prove such a theory would be to have a clear and exact understanding of the nature of transvestism, transsexualism and how they directly overlap with sexuality. A tall order if I ever saw one.

I know I focus a lot on this issue but its because of all the harm that Blanchard has caused people who were already hurting and needed support. Instead he has provided a level of judgment and derision not normally associated with an academic researcher.

Gender dysphoria is not a problem of misdirected sexuality but a problem of gender identity and sexuality becoming re-arranged in a way that we do not yet comprehend.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

prejudice disguised as objective rectitude

So here is Professor Jordan Peterson perhaps justly calling out the excesses of political correctness gone mad. But then he extends it to not indulging transgender people the basic dignity of being addressed in their preferred pronoun. To do so for him would cost nothing and to stand on literal principle seems to serve little use other than to send a message of disdain.

If you have transitioned or even live as the opposite gender is costs me nothing to address you in your preferred pronouns. What difference does it make to me and what am I trying to tell you when I don't?

Peterson wants to stand on his rights to call reality what it is except that in this case the exact objective escapes me. But of course the right wing Federalist is in love with him because he calls a spade a spade.

If I see a rock I can call it that but then the rock doesn’t have any feelings. To address a transgender woman "her" and "she" is not undermining my rights as a person in any way b…

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.

the pseudoscience behind gender dysphoria

The real science as to what causes gender dysphoria still awaits.

Harry Benjamin was on to something except he didn’t have the scientific evidence to back up his suspicions hence, like a true scientist, he negated to draw conclusions. His hunch, based on treating so many patients over his lifetime, was that one is born with a predisposition to be gender dysphoric.

However, with inconclusive brain scans and no DNA marker (as of yet) we are left with believing the word of people who need help and only want to lead happy and productive lives.

The best we have been able to muster since Benjamin's death in 1986 was to amass statistics on who gets a boner imagining themselves as a woman which is in equal parts pathetic and disappointing. For this is not really science at all but is instead playing with interview data that doesn't point to anything definitive or conclusive. I have dealt with this problem at great length in my blog.

The whole thing started with Kurt Freund's obses…