Skip to main content

disproving the unprovable

Some of the more analytically minded among us have been actively working to disprove the work of Ray Blanchard; one the most noteable example being Julia Serano. My question would be why?

I am among the loudest critics of his work but I don't need to disprove it, I only need to point to its gaping flaws. His hypothesis is that presence of a phenomena is a driver for something else. The hitch of course is that he lacks conclusive proof. I as the defense lawyer need do nothing because the onus is on the prosecuting attorney.

If I use my own life as an example, I credit the presence of any erotic overtones with being one of the primary drivers in preventing me from transitioning instead of directing me towards it. I am a borderline transsexual and if you read the early days of this blog and this was the aspect that terrified me the most. I just wanted to be normal.

Has Blanchard failed to provide the burden of proof? absolutely. There is nothing to disprove then.

I make a counter proposal here on a regular basis: that the presence of any erotic overtones are part and parcel of the contradiction inherent in having gender dysphoria, a body powered on male hormones and being heterosexual.

My assertion has just as much validity as Blanchard's. Go ahead and prove that I am wrong.

At this point only one of two things will change my mind: Blanchard builds a scientifically solid case or I stop using my head. Neither of which is likely to happen anytime soon.

Perhaps disproving the unprovable is burning energy for naught.



Comments

  1. Joanna,

    I just recently came across your blog and I absolutely love it. Your theory that the erotic overtones may simply arise from being heterosexual, transgender, and flooded with testosterone is marvelous. Why not? But I must say that the feelings were with me even as a child in grade school... it was erotic in its own way. So I've wondered if perhaps the feelings also arise from the fantasy of being "right in the world," my true gender. It does feel great after all, doesn't it?

    As for Blanchard: I feel he did a lot of harm to many including me, adding to my shame instead of helping contribute to helpful understanding and compassion. That is simply unconscionable in my book. I wonder where I'd be if I'd never had to contend with his crap.

    Anyway, thanks for your blog. I am very much looking forward to exploring it and learning from you.

    Hugs,

    Emma

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Emma I am glad to help in any way. The best way to fight misinformation is to read up and learn. This is what I did and found the emperor had no clothes. Not everyone is as bothered as I was but for me the exercise helped me come to terms with who I was because this is how my mind works. I needed to look beyond the curtain only to see a tiny man operating a megaphone and an effect machine (remember the wizard of Oz?). This is now how I think of Blanchard. Be well!!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

the pseudoscience behind gender dysphoria

The real science as to what causes gender dysphoria still awaits.

Harry Benjamin was on to something except he didn’t have the scientific evidence to back up his suspicions hence, like a true scientist, he negated to draw conclusions. His hunch, based on treating so many patients over his lifetime, was that one is born with a predisposition to be gender dysphoric.

However, with inconclusive brain scans and no DNA marker (as of yet) we are left with believing the word of people who need help and only want to lead happy and productive lives.

The best we have been able to muster since Benjamin's death in 1986 was to amass statistics on who gets a boner imagining themselves as a woman which is in equal parts pathetic and disappointing. For this is not really science at all but is instead playing with interview data that doesn't point to anything definitive or conclusive. I have dealt with this problem at great length in my blog.

The whole thing started with Kurt Freund's obses…

looking past cross gender arousal

Jack’s latest Crossdreamers post got me thinking about cross gender arousal and how it could be avoided; also whether it even matters. This with particular focus on the inability to relate of someone on the outside looking in.

You see, sexuality is a very complicated thing to begin with and when you then add gender identity ambiguity it becomes a recipe to really confuse someone.

So imagine that you are a little boy who identifies as a girl but then along comes puberty and short circuits everything by having the sex you identify with also be the sex you are attracted to. For in essence this is what happens to all all male to female gender dysphoric trans persons who are attracted to women.

So I ask myself: can I imagine a scenario where this inherent contradiction would not produce sexual confusion? The answer is that I cannot.

I am in the unique position, like many of you, to have experienced an early identification with the feminine become sexualized later on. This brought confusion…

understanding the erotic component

I have written about crossed wires before in two separate posts. The idea is that one cannot pass through puberty and the development of sexual feelings for females and not have your pre-existing gender dysphoria be impacted through your psychosexual development. The hormone responsible for your libido is testosterone which is present in much stronger concentration in males and is why gynephilics are most likely to experience erotic overtones as the conflict between romantic external feelings and their pull towards the feminine become permanently intertwined.

Because I came from a deeply religious family where sex was not discussed much at all, I grew up with little access to information and was very much ignorant of matters relating to the subject. With no firsthand experience in intercourse until I married I was then faced with the reality that my ability to perform sexually had been deeply impacted by my dysphoric feelings. This began years of turmoil and self-deprecating thoughts …