Skip to main content

interesting parallels

I have been reflecting lately on how sexual orientation overlaps with gender dysphoria.

First let's compare drag queens to crossdressers. Both are invested in their manhood but with a little less conviction than a conventional male. Both dress frequently and both enjoy exhibiting feminine behavior. You will also find that each group has members who range from occasional dressers to virtually full time living.

As an illustration of how it works on the homosexual side, just read the history of the Jewel Box Revue to see examples of how conventional homosexual men intermingled with full blown transsexuals and everything in between.

What continues to fascinate me is the dividing line.

Harry Benjamin seems to have been correct to propose a graded scale because that is exactly what we see in the real world. It is literally a miriad of variations on a continuum. By thinking along these lines, orientation becomes more of a filter through which gender dysphoria must pass instead of a defining feature.

It has been suggested that the main difference between androphilics and gynephilics is the erotic component but this can be in large part adressed through the absence of conflict between object of sexual desire and the perceived internal gender identity in the androphilic. However the sexual fantasies of pre-transition transsexuals, regardless of orientation, should in theory overlap since all are taking the mental role of the female during intercourse.

Some androphilics insist that because they were effeminate during childhood it makes their claim of transsexualism more valid. But think of this another way: is a very feminine woman more of a woman than a butch and masculine one?

At the end of the day we must admit that this issue is exceedingly complex as is all human sexuality.

But if what I am saying here is correct (and I strongly believe it is) it would put into question the idea that androphilic transitions are somehow more valid than gynephilic ones. If anything androphilics who strangely esposuse the Blanchard model should rejoice that they are not mentally ill and that Benjamin was essentially correct with his biological one.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

prejudice disguised as objective rectitude

So here is Professor Jordan Peterson perhaps justly calling out the excesses of political correctness gone mad. But then he extends it to not indulging transgender people the basic dignity of being addressed in their preferred pronoun. To do so for him would cost nothing and to stand on literal principle seems to serve little use other than to send a message of disdain.

If you have transitioned or even live as the opposite gender is costs me nothing to address you in your preferred pronouns. What difference does it make to me and what am I trying to tell you when I don't?

Peterson wants to stand on his rights to call reality what it is except that in this case the exact objective escapes me. But of course the right wing Federalist is in love with him because he calls a spade a spade.

If I see a rock I can call it that but then the rock doesn’t have any feelings. To address a transgender woman "her" and "she" is not undermining my rights as a person in any way b…

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.

the pseudoscience behind gender dysphoria

The real science as to what causes gender dysphoria still awaits.

Harry Benjamin was on to something except he didn’t have the scientific evidence to back up his suspicions hence, like a true scientist, he negated to draw conclusions. His hunch, based on treating so many patients over his lifetime, was that one is born with a predisposition to be gender dysphoric.

However, with inconclusive brain scans and no DNA marker (as of yet) we are left with believing the word of people who need help and only want to lead happy and productive lives.

The best we have been able to muster since Benjamin's death in 1986 was to amass statistics on who gets a boner imagining themselves as a woman which is in equal parts pathetic and disappointing. For this is not really science at all but is instead playing with interview data that doesn't point to anything definitive or conclusive. I have dealt with this problem at great length in my blog.

The whole thing started with Kurt Freund's obses…