Skip to main content

Mr. Caitlyn Jenner

This what being a Republican gets Caitlyn Jenner: the courtesy of being addressed in male pronouns.

Now admittedly this site is more right leaning than some but it strikes at the heart of the challenge that people who transition face in front of Biblically literalist evangelicals and very staunch right wingers who cannot see past the DNA issue. They are still stuck on the garden of Eden so you're not going to get them to budge.

Gender dysphoria may be recognized by expert clinicians and researchers who treat and care for the transgender but for a great many people this comes down to pure folly.

What is funny is that while some transgender and transsexual people themselves can't get their own house in order (Blanchardism versus biology) the rest of the world could care less and either embraces or wholeheartedly rejects.

Ever since Republicanism became less and less about fiscal conservatism and more about traditional (dare I say backward) positions on wedge issues like homosexuality, immigrants and religious fervor, it's gotten harder and harder to talk about actual science.

Unfortunately for us the science is dragging woefully behind on our issue.

I wonder how Jenner rationalizes all this in her mind.

The story can be found at the following link:


  1. I read the article and just came away seething at the use of the male pronoun....both on your part and the author of the article. Absolutely inexcusable. With that said, Joanna, I have always felt a close connection with you and still do. I can disagree with Caitlyn's politics but I will never use the male pronoun when referring to her.

    As far as her politics are concerned, I am more towards the center and don't subscribe to her apparent views on homosexuality, immigrants, gay marriage, etc. I really wonder if these are her views or perhaps her true feelings are taken out of context. It's beyond me to believe that anyone trans would not support gay marriage and virtually any LGBT issues.


    1. Calie I hope you know that my tongue was very much in my cheek when I used the male pronoun for her. I don't at all agree with the approach of the article and its disrespect. Regardless of my agreement or not with her politics it was the wrong thing to do

    2. I get it, Joanna. I was a bit emotional the day I wrote that and my response was prompted by a pronoun issue I witnessed just a few hours prior to reading your post. I'm sorry, Joanna. Not my style to put my emotions into the written word unless it is a carefully worded blog post.

  2. As a Republican with some views I cannot agree with I do see Caitlyn Jenner as being in a unique position to educate people and find acceptance from others in a positive fashion by being one of them rather than trying to force feed an agenda down someone's throat.
    I have been told that I bat right, throw right and think right and I tend to see myself as a traditional conservative, libertarian who believes in self reliance and acceptance of all. I think many other Republicans feel that we need less government and that the government we have should comport with its constitutional mandate. I do not think government's role is to make me think like you and I do not think my role is to make you think like me. Jenner can be admired for what she did in her prior life and for the courage she shows today. If you liked the old Bruce how can you not like the new Caitlyn?

  3. well said Pat. I don't mean to pick on Republicans but just the ones who are most contrary to Caitlyn and how she deals with it...


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

prejudice disguised as objective rectitude

So here is Professor Jordan Peterson perhaps justly calling out the excesses of political correctness gone mad. But then he extends it to not indulging transgender people the basic dignity of being addressed in their preferred pronoun. To do so for him would cost nothing and to stand on literal principle seems to serve little use other than to send a message of disdain.

If you have transitioned or even live as the opposite gender is costs me nothing to address you in your preferred pronouns. What difference does it make to me and what am I trying to tell you when I don't?

Peterson wants to stand on his rights to call reality what it is except that in this case the exact objective escapes me. But of course the right wing Federalist is in love with him because he calls a spade a spade.

If I see a rock I can call it that but then the rock doesn’t have any feelings. To address a transgender woman "her" and "she" is not undermining my rights as a person in any way b…

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.

the pseudoscience behind gender dysphoria

The real science as to what causes gender dysphoria still awaits.

Harry Benjamin was on to something except he didn’t have the scientific evidence to back up his suspicions hence, like a true scientist, he negated to draw conclusions. His hunch, based on treating so many patients over his lifetime, was that one is born with a predisposition to be gender dysphoric.

However, with inconclusive brain scans and no DNA marker (as of yet) we are left with believing the word of people who need help and only want to lead happy and productive lives.

The best we have been able to muster since Benjamin's death in 1986 was to amass statistics on who gets a boner imagining themselves as a woman which is in equal parts pathetic and disappointing. For this is not really science at all but is instead playing with interview data that doesn't point to anything definitive or conclusive. I have dealt with this problem at great length in my blog.

The whole thing started with Kurt Freund's obses…