Skip to main content

They drag me back in...

Autogynephilia theory supporters call anyone who does not acknowledge their invented condition “deniers”.

I'm sorry but we already know that cross gender arousal exists and always has existed.

In fact, it existed long before this pseudoscientific term was coined but the simple reason many of us don’t acknowledge the validity of this so called "theory" is because it associates the desire to transition exclusively with sexual arousal and nothing else. In other words, it negates that there is such thing as a transgender identity.

At this point I am going to assume these people think we are stupid.

It cannot be put in simpler terms.

Comments

  1. On any given topic there are individuals whose thinking is the personification of fast-acting concrete. The notion of considering a thought from various vantage points before drawing a conclusion is simply alien to them. Seemingly, objectivity isn't in their DNA.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It's unfortunate but true Katie and there are self interests involved in promoting this quackery I'm afraid. Better people have gone before in this field of research and yet failed to come up with this conclusion namely Hirschfeld and Benjamin to name the most prominent.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I suspect the quackery (nice word) is a masquerade of science for their prejudice against something they cannot understand nor accept. As if, since they can't tolerate transgender they must therefore establish rhetoric that denies it.

    The worst part of their position is the hurt it causes people who are in the early stages of their own learning about themselves, when they are absorbing everything they can, perhaps already afraid and ashamed, and thus further marginalized and hurt, possibly for years or decades.

    ReplyDelete
  4. There is a lot of truth in what you say Emma. There has been an attempt to marginalise transgender people and those who push in this direction have used the work of Blanchard as reinforcement. It's not science but it is packaged to appear that way until you open the wrapper and see nothing there. When I was struggling this work almost had me fooled for a while and it only added to my self blame that this is something I might have caused.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I wonder, have you seen this: I Am A Girl! - Ik ben een meisje!: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TXpViPHnT3U

    When we see videos like this it's so clear that she was simply born transgender. She's lovely, I'm sure you'll agree.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Emma there are people in this world that were clearly born with the wrong plumbing no question.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

prejudice disguised as objective rectitude

So here is Professor Jordan Peterson perhaps justly calling out the excesses of political correctness gone mad. But then he extends it to not indulging transgender people the basic dignity of being addressed in their preferred pronoun. To do so for him would cost nothing and to stand on literal principle seems to serve little use other than to send a message of disdain.

If you have transitioned or even live as the opposite gender is costs me nothing to address you in your preferred pronouns. What difference does it make to me and what am I trying to tell you when I don't?

Peterson wants to stand on his rights to call reality what it is except that in this case the exact objective escapes me. But of course the right wing Federalist is in love with him because he calls a spade a spade.

If I see a rock I can call it that but then the rock doesn’t have any feelings. To address a transgender woman "her" and "she" is not undermining my rights as a person in any way b…

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.

looking past cross gender arousal

Jack’s latest Crossdreamers post got me thinking about cross gender arousal and how it could be avoided; also whether it even matters. This with particular focus on the inability to relate of someone on the outside looking in.

You see, sexuality is a very complicated thing to begin with and when you then add gender identity ambiguity it becomes a recipe to really confuse someone.

So imagine that you are a little boy who identifies as a girl but then along comes puberty and short circuits everything by having the sex you identify with also be the sex you are attracted to. For in essence this is what happens to all all male to female gender dysphoric trans persons who are attracted to women.

So I ask myself: can I imagine a scenario where this inherent contradiction would not produce sexual confusion? The answer is that I cannot.

I am in the unique position, like many of you, to have experienced an early identification with the feminine become sexualized later on. This brought confusion…