Skip to main content

They drag me back in...

Autogynephilia theory supporters call anyone who does not acknowledge their invented condition “deniers”.

I'm sorry but we already know that cross gender arousal exists and always has existed.

In fact, it existed long before this pseudoscientific term was coined but the simple reason many of us don’t acknowledge the validity of this so called "theory" is because it associates the desire to transition exclusively with sexual arousal and nothing else. In other words, it negates that there is such thing as a transgender identity.

At this point I am going to assume these people think we are stupid.

It cannot be put in simpler terms.

Comments

  1. On any given topic there are individuals whose thinking is the personification of fast-acting concrete. The notion of considering a thought from various vantage points before drawing a conclusion is simply alien to them. Seemingly, objectivity isn't in their DNA.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It's unfortunate but true Katie and there are self interests involved in promoting this quackery I'm afraid. Better people have gone before in this field of research and yet failed to come up with this conclusion namely Hirschfeld and Benjamin to name the most prominent.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I suspect the quackery (nice word) is a masquerade of science for their prejudice against something they cannot understand nor accept. As if, since they can't tolerate transgender they must therefore establish rhetoric that denies it.

    The worst part of their position is the hurt it causes people who are in the early stages of their own learning about themselves, when they are absorbing everything they can, perhaps already afraid and ashamed, and thus further marginalized and hurt, possibly for years or decades.

    ReplyDelete
  4. There is a lot of truth in what you say Emma. There has been an attempt to marginalise transgender people and those who push in this direction have used the work of Blanchard as reinforcement. It's not science but it is packaged to appear that way until you open the wrapper and see nothing there. When I was struggling this work almost had me fooled for a while and it only added to my self blame that this is something I might have caused.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I wonder, have you seen this: I Am A Girl! - Ik ben een meisje!: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TXpViPHnT3U

    When we see videos like this it's so clear that she was simply born transgender. She's lovely, I'm sure you'll agree.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Emma there are people in this world that were clearly born with the wrong plumbing no question.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

the pseudoscience behind gender dysphoria

The real science as to what causes gender dysphoria still awaits.

Harry Benjamin was on to something except he didn’t have the scientific evidence to back up his suspicions hence, like a true scientist, he negated to draw conclusions. His hunch, based on treating so many patients over his lifetime, was that one is born with a predisposition to be gender dysphoric.

However, with inconclusive brain scans and no DNA marker (as of yet) we are left with believing the word of people who need help and only want to lead happy and productive lives.

The best we have been able to muster since Benjamin's death in 1986 was to amass statistics on who gets a boner imagining themselves as a woman which is in equal parts pathetic and disappointing. For this is not really science at all but is instead playing with interview data that doesn't point to anything definitive or conclusive. I have dealt with this problem at great length in my blog.

The whole thing started with Kurt Freund's obses…

looking past cross gender arousal

Jack’s latest Crossdreamers post got me thinking about cross gender arousal and how it could be avoided; also whether it even matters. This with particular focus on the inability to relate of someone on the outside looking in.

You see, sexuality is a very complicated thing to begin with and when you then add gender identity ambiguity it becomes a recipe to really confuse someone.

So imagine that you are a little boy who identifies as a girl but then along comes puberty and short circuits everything by having the sex you identify with also be the sex you are attracted to. For in essence this is what happens to all all male to female gender dysphoric trans persons who are attracted to women.

So I ask myself: can I imagine a scenario where this inherent contradiction would not produce sexual confusion? The answer is that I cannot.

I am in the unique position, like many of you, to have experienced an early identification with the feminine become sexualized later on. This brought confusion…

understanding the erotic component

I have written about crossed wires before in two separate posts. The idea is that one cannot pass through puberty and the development of sexual feelings for females and not have your pre-existing gender dysphoria be impacted through your psychosexual development. The hormone responsible for your libido is testosterone which is present in much stronger concentration in males and is why gynephilics are most likely to experience erotic overtones as the conflict between romantic external feelings and their pull towards the feminine become permanently intertwined.

Because I came from a deeply religious family where sex was not discussed much at all, I grew up with little access to information and was very much ignorant of matters relating to the subject. With no firsthand experience in intercourse until I married I was then faced with the reality that my ability to perform sexually had been deeply impacted by my dysphoric feelings. This began years of turmoil and self-deprecating thoughts …