Skip to main content

demagoguery

One thing that is universal is that as long as people have populated this planet there are those who presume to speak with knowledge they clearly don’t possess. They take their own life experience and use that to pronounce themselves on how things should be instead of how they are.

It’s a universal phenomenon and applicable to any issue you can think of.

If I could change one thing it would be that. If you lack the proper information about an issue and cannot relate to another person’s experience simply mind your own business and don’t pretend that you can counsel them.

The driving force behind this phenomenon is human fear and prejudice. We fear what we don’t understand and assume the worst.

Look at the fear and loathing coming from conservative circles over transgender bathrooms as an example. The hyperbole is staggering and suddenly transgender people are being portrayed as molesters rather than as people who don’t want to be persecuted for who they are.

This is fear mongering and pandering to the lowest common denominator.

Donald Trump, who is a demagogue in his own right, uses this strategy to perfection. He spews unintelligible statements and changes his mind on a daily basis on a variety of issues he barely understands but he does so with conviction say his supporters. They are as half-witted as he is and no more educated because we unfortunately live in an era of anti-intellectualism and faux-news that panders to a captive base.

I used to not understand how someone like Hitler was able to rise to power but now I do. Demagoguery can do much if you wrap it in patriotic speeches which fan the embers of deep-seated prejudices.

Human nature is what it is and some things improve while some get worse. It just seems to happen in cycles.


 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

prejudice disguised as objective rectitude

So here is Professor Jordan Peterson perhaps justly calling out the excesses of political correctness gone mad. But then he extends it to not indulging transgender people the basic dignity of being addressed in their preferred pronoun. To do so for him would cost nothing and to stand on literal principle seems to serve little use other than to send a message of disdain.

If you have transitioned or even live as the opposite gender is costs me nothing to address you in your preferred pronouns. What difference does it make to me and what am I trying to tell you when I don't?

Peterson wants to stand on his rights to call reality what it is except that in this case the exact objective escapes me. But of course the right wing Federalist is in love with him because he calls a spade a spade.

If I see a rock I can call it that but then the rock doesn’t have any feelings. To address a transgender woman "her" and "she" is not undermining my rights as a person in any way b…

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.

the pseudoscience behind gender dysphoria

The real science as to what causes gender dysphoria still awaits.

Harry Benjamin was on to something except he didn’t have the scientific evidence to back up his suspicions hence, like a true scientist, he negated to draw conclusions. His hunch, based on treating so many patients over his lifetime, was that one is born with a predisposition to be gender dysphoric.

However, with inconclusive brain scans and no DNA marker (as of yet) we are left with believing the word of people who need help and only want to lead happy and productive lives.

The best we have been able to muster since Benjamin's death in 1986 was to amass statistics on who gets a boner imagining themselves as a woman which is in equal parts pathetic and disappointing. For this is not really science at all but is instead playing with interview data that doesn't point to anything definitive or conclusive. I have dealt with this problem at great length in my blog.

The whole thing started with Kurt Freund's obses…