Skip to main content

now its anorexia...

The Federalist keeps trying and for that you have to give them credit.

If it’s not trotting out Walt Heyer its now comparing being transgender with having anorexia nervosa. Yes the condition where you slowly starve yourself to death if people don’t get you to treatment.

Moira Fleming who has suffered from this condition herself suggests we treat the dysphoria like the mental illness which makes the trans person look in the mirror and hate their “wrong” body the same way that an anorexic thinks they’re fine instead of looking emaciated. Her point goes back to the popular mantra “just because you think you’re woman and fix all your parts doesn’t mean you are one”.

For me this misses the point because the treatment that works is always the correct one. This means that if a transition saves a life then it is as much correct as giving food to the anorexic. Ms. Fleming is actually more concerned about the legalistic and biological aspects of what defines a woman which doesn’t really interest me all that much.

I am more interested in preventing the suffering of people with gender dysphoria.

If a young or older person transitions and their life is better why does it have to bother people like Ms. Fleming quite so much? but then those who write for periodicals like the Federalist are conservatives and of course this issue rubs their rhubarb the wrong way.

What makes a man or a woman is actually not as obvious as Ms. Fleming would like to believe but don’t try to tell that to people who prefer to think in black and white. Which must make it that much more disappointing for the folks at the Federalist that gender dysphoria is a recognized medical condition.

Remember how I always say here that people should stick to subjects they know something about before making judgements? Well this is one of those times and Ms. Fleming might want to stick to writing about anorexia.

http://thefederalist.com/2016/06/27/why-is-transgender-an-identity-but-anorexia-a-disorder/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

prejudice disguised as objective rectitude

So here is Professor Jordan Peterson perhaps justly calling out the excesses of political correctness gone mad. But then he extends it to not indulging transgender people the basic dignity of being addressed in their preferred pronoun. To do so for him would cost nothing and to stand on literal principle seems to serve little use other than to send a message of disdain.

If you have transitioned or even live as the opposite gender is costs me nothing to address you in your preferred pronouns. What difference does it make to me and what am I trying to tell you when I don't?

Peterson wants to stand on his rights to call reality what it is except that in this case the exact objective escapes me. But of course the right wing Federalist is in love with him because he calls a spade a spade.

If I see a rock I can call it that but then the rock doesn’t have any feelings. To address a transgender woman "her" and "she" is not undermining my rights as a person in any way b…

looking past cross gender arousal

Jack’s latest Crossdreamers post got me thinking about cross gender arousal and how it could be avoided; also whether it even matters. This with particular focus on the inability to relate of someone on the outside looking in.

You see, sexuality is a very complicated thing to begin with and when you then add gender identity ambiguity it becomes a recipe to really confuse someone.

So imagine that you are a little boy who identifies as a girl but then along comes puberty and short circuits everything by having the sex you identify with also be the sex you are attracted to. For in essence this is what happens to all all male to female gender dysphoric trans persons who are attracted to women.

So I ask myself: can I imagine a scenario where this inherent contradiction would not produce sexual confusion? The answer is that I cannot.

I am in the unique position, like many of you, to have experienced an early identification with the feminine become sexualized later on. This brought confusion…

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.