Skip to main content

pandering to the base

On the eve of the Republican national convention we can now look back and recall the early days of the Trump campaign. All the pundits predicted that a comical buffoon like this could never get elected but he was entertaining with his talk about building walls to keep the foreigners out. Trump talked openly about how the Mexicans were rapists ready to have their way with American women.

But he kept winning Primaries and kept appealing to the white mostly rural voters who were hungry for jingoistic talk about rebuilding American greatness.

The Republicans have clearly given up on the immigrant, African American and Hispanic votes because they have no chance of getting them. The most popular PiƱata is now an effigy of Donald Trump which Hispanics line up to eviscerate in search of treats and as a way to vent frustration at this man who fans the flames of hatred to capitalize on white people’s fears.

The GOP base is scared to death of foreigners, LGBT folks and anyone who doesn’t subscribe to their base values which strangely combine religious fervor and mistrust of government with love of guns and disdain for anyone different. These aren’t rocket scientist voters they’re after but there might be enough of them to make the race interesting.

So it’s going to be the predominantly conservative white base that they are going with and hope it’s enough.

It worked for Nixon in 1968 as he played the race card with a white electorate fatigued of the African American encroachment into their territory. Except this period feels different due to a level of polarization I have never seen before in my lifetime and to the dumbing down of society which has been officially in full swing for some time now. Just keep them consuming and posting banalities on social media and they won't pay attention.

It worked for the GOP in 1968 but let’s cross our fingers for the sake of America and hope that it doesn’t work now.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

how times change

How times have changed.

Whereas transition was something not to even contemplate for us, here is a young trans person who felt the opposite pressure. She looks and sounds extremely passable but decided it wasn't for her despite the social media presence of young transitioners potentially inspiring her to.

We are all different and I happen to think she's rather a smart cookie as well...


indoctrination

As transgender people, organized religion hasn't really been our friend however on the other hand it has often had little to do with true spirituality. I needed to learn this over time and much of what I was taught growing up was steeped in the judgmental superstition of society instead of what some creator would demand of me.

Regardless of your belief system, you are a child of the universe and have been endowed with uniqueness and goodness of spirit. You have probably never wished anyone ill will and you have tried your best to live within the absurd coordinate system of humanity. Yet somehow belonging to the LGBT community was entirely your fault.

As I have grown older this inherent irrationality became increasingly evident to me. I knew I was a fundamentally good person and yet I was different in a way which was not of my choosing. Hence with this comprehension my self appreciation and esteem grew in proportion.

Religion for me today seems forever trapped in the misinterpretat…

let's please read carefully

This post is prompted by a recent comment I received to one of my older posts and I wanted to address it.

I used to wonder why some transgender people accepted Blanchard’s work until I think I figured out why: they may not have examined it closely enough. They would experience cross gender arousal and then accept it was Autogynephilia without properly understanding what the term meant and what the theory said: it is an invented sexual “illness” which makes people transition. In other words, it is the arousal itself which causes this desire and not a pre-existing gender identity which does not align with birth sex. Of course, Blanchard has no explanation for the origin of his proposed “illness” only that it is a form of sexual deviance.

My counter proposal? we transition despite this arousal. In other words, the transgender identity is pre-existing and the arousal is the result of the mismatching of burgeoning sexual feelings towards females and this misaligned identity; it is not per…