Skip to main content

why Julia Serano is absolutely correct

Transgender woman and activist Julia Serano is absolutely correct.

By using the term Autogynephilia you are giving it weight, substance and validation. Her reasoning is the same as mine: that there is a distinction between acknowledging the erotic overtones experienced by the gynephilic male to female crossdreamer or transgender person and what this word is meant to fully imply which is:

1) That the arousal is a distinct narcissistic sexual orientation
2) That it is the sole driver for the desire to transition and the source of the dysphoria instead of its symptom

Both of these assertions can be easily called into question primarily because they cannot be proven and that is enough to take them out of the realm of scientifically accepted fact. When something is unproven you don't boost its credibility by merely inventing a scientific sounding term. But then science isn't exactly the strong suit of sexologists.

We have made this type of error before with Phrenology and Nymphomania so it wouldn't be the first time.

I myself no longer use the term but simply call it cross gender arousal while Serano has coined the term female embodiment fantasies (or FEFs for short). The point is that this experience could just as easily be a symptom of being trans and gynephilic instead of being the cause of gender dysphoria.

The transgender woman whose screed I referred to some posts ago could care less about what contributes towards making a person transgender and in the end she is right. Even if cross gender arousal was a main element it would still have validity if the person transitions and is happier than before.

The rest is then about what defines a woman and most people would tell you it is DNA and chromosomes which androphilics eagerly espousing AGP because they think it paints them in a better light should consider.

I could care less either way because it has lost its stigma for me but the main inconvenient truth continues to be the fact that most transgender people know they are the way they are years before they hit puberty while AGP theory hinges its credibility on this detail being very much untrue.

I know precisely who I am today after years of trying to figure it out which has helped me immeasurably in combating my dysphoria. By paying attention to this junk science you will only stunt your own advancement towards internal peace.


Comments

  1. I like your phrase "cross gender arousal" and prefer it over Julia's female embodiment fantasies. The former fits my experience better. But indeed, I appreciate Julia's work. She adds so much.

    Indeed, I also completely agree with "...the main inconvenient truth continues to be the fact that most transgender people know they are the way they are years before they hit puberty..." That's me in a nutshell and I've often pointed that out to those (including myself at times in my life) who attempt to support the autogynephilia pseudoscience. How they ignore that fact is beyond comprehension.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Emma its ignored because it has suited the needs of those who wanted to bolster their own causes but there is nothing there solid enough to hang your hat on..

      Delete
  2. Serano work on autogynephilia has in many ways been a project of liberation. We owe her much.

    Note also that Lisa Mullin is taking a more ironic look at AGP here!. The basic message is the same.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for that Jack I did go to your site and read Lisa's post on this and we very much agree

      Delete
  3. Joanna, you know that all these issues have already been discussed and dealt with. Not only is autogynephilia wrong, but so is Serano's political motivated position of transgender reduction (crossdreaming).

    A fetish exists (not "autogynephilia" or "crossgender arousal", but rather a masochistic emasculation fetish), and obviously, whilst the fetish isn't the cause of all gender dysphoric psychologies, it is the usual cause of gender dysphoric psychologies on part of the fetishists in question.

    "most transgender people know they are the way they are years before they hit puberty while AGP theory hinges its credibility on this detail being very much untrue."

    Joanna, again, this is old territory. Sexuality (and the development of it's emotional attachments) exists very early in childhood. What puberty is, is a general increase in sexual capacity, and the period for which masturbation/erogenous stimulation is discovered, being itself the conceptualisation of "sexuality", thus the possible condition for which existing sexual phenomena can be recognised as such.

    "I know precisely who I am today after years of trying to figure it out which has helped me immeasurably in combating my dysphoria. By paying attention to this junk science you will only stunt your own advancement towards internal peace."

    What is core to you, and what must be understood with honesty, is the emotional attachment, that for fetishists it routinely derives from their sexual desires, and importantly that the fetish doesn't necessarily invalidate or constrain any such psychology which may arise out of it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I hope you know by now that I will never see your point of view but you are certainly entitled to it. The important thing is that your fetish narrative works for you and that is what matters most because We all need a personal explanation that works for us.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.

the pseudoscience behind gender dysphoria

The real science as to what causes gender dysphoria still awaits.

Harry Benjamin was on to something except he didn’t have the scientific evidence to back up his suspicions hence, like a true scientist, he negated to draw conclusions. His hunch, based on treating so many patients over his lifetime, was that one is born with a predisposition to be gender dysphoric.

However, with inconclusive brain scans and no DNA marker (as of yet) we are left with believing the word of people who need help and only want to lead happy and productive lives.

The best we have been able to muster since Benjamin's death in 1986 was to amass statistics on who gets a boner imagining themselves as a woman which is in equal parts pathetic and disappointing. For this is not really science at all but is instead playing with interview data that doesn't point to anything definitive or conclusive. I have dealt with this problem at great length in my blog.

The whole thing started with Kurt Freund's obses…

looking past cross gender arousal

Jack’s latest Crossdreamers post got me thinking about cross gender arousal and how it could be avoided; also whether it even matters. This with particular focus on the inability to relate of someone on the outside looking in.

You see, sexuality is a very complicated thing to begin with and when you then add gender identity ambiguity it becomes a recipe to really confuse someone.

So imagine that you are a little boy who identifies as a girl but then along comes puberty and short circuits everything by having the sex you identify with also be the sex you are attracted to. For in essence this is what happens to all all male to female gender dysphoric trans persons who are attracted to women.

So I ask myself: can I imagine a scenario where this inherent contradiction would not produce sexual confusion? The answer is that I cannot.

I am in the unique position, like many of you, to have experienced an early identification with the feminine become sexualized later on. This brought confusion…