Skip to main content

why the pseudoscience has little relevance

This topic is so devoid of real science and so replete with conjecture that it boggles the mind.

We haven't yet found a biological gender dysphoria marker (if such a thing exists) and that had opened the door to speculation and to charlatanism. It is, for example, what permitted Kurt Freund to mentor Ray Blanchard and ultimately create the "it's only about sex" school of transsexualism. Were it only so simple but then reality rarely is.

Thus far conjecture has managed to have the upper hand because we are not privy to the inner workings of the human brain and have barely begun to map it. It is for this reason that it was easy to treat the gender questioning patient like the man who thought he was Napoleon.

What has added weight to our credibility as transgender people (who now represent 0.6% of the population according to the latest survey data) is that most of us are hardly ready for the looney bin. When your judge, doctor or local firefighter suddenly comes out, people are hard pressed to understand but know this person through their honourable past which usually includes a credible history of integrity.

I, for example, am known in my business sphere and I am respected. Were I ever to come out fully in my field it would surprise many but I think most would try to see my decision as not being frivolous because they know me. It is this way with many others as well and it is how we will become part of the fabric of society.

This is why the pseudoscience ultimately hasn't succeeded and why transgender people are being treated favorably by the courts and governments of most nations. It is because the vast majority have a reasonable degree of credibility which carries far more weight than anything else.

Another puzzling element is that the conjecturing which is mostly present in cyberspace and within academic circles has strangely been used as ammunition for those who want to derail transgender advancement and dignity. If you are still unsure whether there is academic hubris at play ask yourself why someone so committed to this subject would turn to Twitter to denigrate the very people you are supposedly trying to assist. This is what can happen when your work starts to lose relevance.

There are many sites who purport to have the truth but couldn't be further from it and they will always attract the captive audience which agrees with them.

One day they may find actual conclusive evidence that allows us to predict whether a child will be transgender or not. But even if they don't it matters less than the idea that differences that don't harm other people should be respected for what they are: just differences.

If life experience has taught me anything it's that those who fight hardest to denigrate someone else are the ones most driven by their own fear and prejudice.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

how times change

How times have changed.

Whereas transition was something not to even contemplate for us, here is a young trans person who felt the opposite pressure. She looks and sounds extremely passable but decided it wasn't for her despite the social media presence of young transitioners potentially inspiring her to.

We are all different and I happen to think she's rather a smart cookie as well...


indoctrination

As transgender people, organized religion hasn't really been our friend however on the other hand it has often had little to do with true spirituality. I needed to learn this over time and much of what I was taught growing up was steeped in the judgmental superstition of society instead of what some creator would demand of me.

Regardless of your belief system, you are a child of the universe and have been endowed with uniqueness and goodness of spirit. You have probably never wished anyone ill will and you have tried your best to live within the absurd coordinate system of humanity. Yet somehow belonging to the LGBT community was entirely your fault.

As I have grown older this inherent irrationality became increasingly evident to me. I knew I was a fundamentally good person and yet I was different in a way which was not of my choosing. Hence with this comprehension my self appreciation and esteem grew in proportion.

Religion for me today seems forever trapped in the misinterpretat…

let's please read carefully

This post is prompted by a recent comment I received to one of my older posts and I wanted to address it.

I used to wonder why some transgender people accepted Blanchard’s work until I think I figured out why: they may not have examined it closely enough. They would experience cross gender arousal and then accept it was Autogynephilia without properly understanding what the term meant and what the theory said: it is an invented sexual “illness” which makes people transition. In other words, it is the arousal itself which causes this desire and not a pre-existing gender identity which does not align with birth sex. Of course, Blanchard has no explanation for the origin of his proposed “illness” only that it is a form of sexual deviance.

My counter proposal? we transition despite this arousal. In other words, the transgender identity is pre-existing and the arousal is the result of the mismatching of burgeoning sexual feelings towards females and this misaligned identity; it is not per…