Skip to main content

why the pseudoscience has little relevance

This topic is so devoid of real science and so replete with conjecture that it boggles the mind.

We haven't yet found a biological gender dysphoria marker (if such a thing exists) and that had opened the door to speculation and to charlatanism. It is, for example, what permitted Kurt Freund to mentor Ray Blanchard and ultimately create the "it's only about sex" school of transsexualism. Were it only so simple but then reality rarely is.

Thus far conjecture has managed to have the upper hand because we are not privy to the inner workings of the human brain and have barely begun to map it. It is for this reason that it was easy to treat the gender questioning patient like the man who thought he was Napoleon.

What has added weight to our credibility as transgender people (who now represent 0.6% of the population according to the latest survey data) is that most of us are hardly ready for the looney bin. When your judge, doctor or local firefighter suddenly comes out, people are hard pressed to understand but know this person through their honourable past which usually includes a credible history of integrity.

I, for example, am known in my business sphere and I am respected. Were I ever to come out fully in my field it would surprise many but I think most would try to see my decision as not being frivolous because they know me. It is this way with many others as well and it is how we will become part of the fabric of society.

This is why the pseudoscience ultimately hasn't succeeded and why transgender people are being treated favorably by the courts and governments of most nations. It is because the vast majority have a reasonable degree of credibility which carries far more weight than anything else.

Another puzzling element is that the conjecturing which is mostly present in cyberspace and within academic circles has strangely been used as ammunition for those who want to derail transgender advancement and dignity. If you are still unsure whether there is academic hubris at play ask yourself why someone so committed to this subject would turn to Twitter to denigrate the very people you are supposedly trying to assist. This is what can happen when your work starts to lose relevance.

There are many sites who purport to have the truth but couldn't be further from it and they will always attract the captive audience which agrees with them.

One day they may find actual conclusive evidence that allows us to predict whether a child will be transgender or not. But even if they don't it matters less than the idea that differences that don't harm other people should be respected for what they are: just differences.

If life experience has taught me anything it's that those who fight hardest to denigrate someone else are the ones most driven by their own fear and prejudice.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

prejudice disguised as objective rectitude

So here is Professor Jordan Peterson perhaps justly calling out the excesses of political correctness gone mad. But then he extends it to not indulging transgender people the basic dignity of being addressed in their preferred pronoun. To do so for him would cost nothing and to stand on literal principle seems to serve little use other than to send a message of disdain.

If you have transitioned or even live as the opposite gender is costs me nothing to address you in your preferred pronouns. What difference does it make to me and what am I trying to tell you when I don't?

Peterson wants to stand on his rights to call reality what it is except that in this case the exact objective escapes me. But of course the right wing Federalist is in love with him because he calls a spade a spade.

If I see a rock I can call it that but then the rock doesn’t have any feelings. To address a transgender woman "her" and "she" is not undermining my rights as a person in any way b…

looking past cross gender arousal

Jack’s latest Crossdreamers post got me thinking about cross gender arousal and how it could be avoided; also whether it even matters. This with particular focus on the inability to relate of someone on the outside looking in.

You see, sexuality is a very complicated thing to begin with and when you then add gender identity ambiguity it becomes a recipe to really confuse someone.

So imagine that you are a little boy who identifies as a girl but then along comes puberty and short circuits everything by having the sex you identify with also be the sex you are attracted to. For in essence this is what happens to all all male to female gender dysphoric trans persons who are attracted to women.

So I ask myself: can I imagine a scenario where this inherent contradiction would not produce sexual confusion? The answer is that I cannot.

I am in the unique position, like many of you, to have experienced an early identification with the feminine become sexualized later on. This brought confusion…

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.