Skip to main content

what else but more bigotry...

Fundamentalist religious and politically conservative websites grate against my sensibilities. Typically diversity intolerant they like their natural model to fit their view of the world which tends to be in perfect shades of black and white.

These are the same people who gave Galileo a hard time for having the audacity to suggest that the earth was not the center of the universe. But here we are in the 21st century and they are still very much with us in the form of sites like Lifesite, Patheos, Breibart News as well as others.

Much of their platform is not science or logic based but instead built on a perversion of faith tinged with intolerance with very little love thy neighbour. In support of the sanctity of man and woman they rail against the LGBT community and their chosen “lifestyle” and love to use terms like "transgender agenda" through warning against its promotion of a gender fluidity conspiracy. All this presumably under the premise of protecting "family values".

Unfortunately, nothing is to be done with these people and they will continue to exist regardless of the education you offer them. They are the ideologically driven "earth is flat" crowd that seem to be ever present in every society.

Take the bathroom issue: any semi-intelligent individual can tell the difference between a sexual predator and a trans person but for this group it's prejudice in the guise of trying to protect the public. Transgender people were using restrooms before without incident and sexual predators don't need to dress as women to do what they will.

Now in Texas a judge has temporarily defied Federal Law by blocking the Obama administration initiative to allow transgender children to use the bathroom that fits their identity. So this tiny sliver of the population is once again going to experience discrimination due to blatant human stupidity. Thank goodness the New York Times editorial board calls these bigots on it (see link below).

These people do have a fall back position in that the science on why people are gay or transgender is sorely lacking but pointing this out to a member of the LGBT community has little value. We know very well that absence of evidence is not definitive proof that something isn't there. But spelling out their position on this issue is not for our elucidation but instead to bolster more discriminatory practices among the already skeptical.

In the end these types of people are driven by unflinching dogmas rather than compassion and tolerance for the diversity and complexity of humanity. There are no agendas but instead only people who don't want to be discriminated against for being different. In that sense the world has changed very little and still has some ways to go.

How I pine for the day when people mind their own business instead of weighing in on the lives of others. May God save us from the imbeciles of this world.


http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/24/opinion/more-attacks-on-transgender-rights.html?_r=0



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

prejudice disguised as objective rectitude

So here is Professor Jordan Peterson perhaps justly calling out the excesses of political correctness gone mad. But then he extends it to not indulging transgender people the basic dignity of being addressed in their preferred pronoun. To do so for him would cost nothing and to stand on literal principle seems to serve little use other than to send a message of disdain.

If you have transitioned or even live as the opposite gender is costs me nothing to address you in your preferred pronouns. What difference does it make to me and what am I trying to tell you when I don't?

Peterson wants to stand on his rights to call reality what it is except that in this case the exact objective escapes me. But of course the right wing Federalist is in love with him because he calls a spade a spade.

If I see a rock I can call it that but then the rock doesn’t have any feelings. To address a transgender woman "her" and "she" is not undermining my rights as a person in any way b…

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.

looking past cross gender arousal

Jack’s latest Crossdreamers post got me thinking about cross gender arousal and how it could be avoided; also whether it even matters. This with particular focus on the inability to relate of someone on the outside looking in.

You see, sexuality is a very complicated thing to begin with and when you then add gender identity ambiguity it becomes a recipe to really confuse someone.

So imagine that you are a little boy who identifies as a girl but then along comes puberty and short circuits everything by having the sex you identify with also be the sex you are attracted to. For in essence this is what happens to all all male to female gender dysphoric trans persons who are attracted to women.

So I ask myself: can I imagine a scenario where this inherent contradiction would not produce sexual confusion? The answer is that I cannot.

I am in the unique position, like many of you, to have experienced an early identification with the feminine become sexualized later on. This brought confusion…