Skip to main content

tolerance and respect for diversity

People who are frustrated by their own life and situations will lash out at others. This is something that I have observed repeatedly over my lifetime. When you are happy in your skin you are less likely to find objection with other people and more inclined to live and let live.

Many people have been raised in ways that have encouraged prejudices which they then proliferate in their adulthood until they come to a realization that they might have been wrong to hold them. In some cases that never happens.

The world needs more understanding of diversity than ever because we are living in an era where nothing is hidden any longer. We have discovered every type of behavioral and identity difference that exists which is challenging preconceived ideas of what we thought was reality. This is most starkly being felt by older people who grew up before we opened the windows and let more light shine onto people’s lives.

The truth is that for millennia, societies have operated using oppression as a weapon of control. This infiltrated down to the level of the family structure and any divergences were seen as being shameful and subject to eradication. Dealing with reality was not the objective but rather adhering to an artificial standard.

Religious and social conservatives are being particularly challenged these days but then these are not the type of role models that I grew up with. They represent the alt-right movement which intends on fighting back against what they deem to be the excesses of social permissiveness gone mad. They will put things right by going back to the old model of oppression.

The world I grew up in was still restrictive and it almost killed my spirit. I am so much more heartened to see the youth of today (which includes my children) be able to see reality for what it is and develop a tolerance and respect for it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

prejudice disguised as objective rectitude

So here is Professor Jordan Peterson perhaps justly calling out the excesses of political correctness gone mad. But then he extends it to not indulging transgender people the basic dignity of being addressed in their preferred pronoun. To do so for him would cost nothing and to stand on literal principle seems to serve little use other than to send a message of disdain.

If you have transitioned or even live as the opposite gender is costs me nothing to address you in your preferred pronouns. What difference does it make to me and what am I trying to tell you when I don't?

Peterson wants to stand on his rights to call reality what it is except that in this case the exact objective escapes me. But of course the right wing Federalist is in love with him because he calls a spade a spade.

If I see a rock I can call it that but then the rock doesn’t have any feelings. To address a transgender woman "her" and "she" is not undermining my rights as a person in any way b…

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.

the pseudoscience behind gender dysphoria

The real science as to what causes gender dysphoria still awaits.

Harry Benjamin was on to something except he didn’t have the scientific evidence to back up his suspicions hence, like a true scientist, he negated to draw conclusions. His hunch, based on treating so many patients over his lifetime, was that one is born with a predisposition to be gender dysphoric.

However, with inconclusive brain scans and no DNA marker (as of yet) we are left with believing the word of people who need help and only want to lead happy and productive lives.

The best we have been able to muster since Benjamin's death in 1986 was to amass statistics on who gets a boner imagining themselves as a woman which is in equal parts pathetic and disappointing. For this is not really science at all but is instead playing with interview data that doesn't point to anything definitive or conclusive. I have dealt with this problem at great length in my blog.

The whole thing started with Kurt Freund's obses…