Skip to main content

more on the Trump victory

I wasn't going to write another post on Trump but I couldn't help it because there was simply more to say. You see, Michael Moore hit the nail on the head and you can read his reasoning in the link below.

Clearly the "Angry White Man" vote came out in droves plus the people who didn't trust or like Hillary Clinton and perhaps were disenthused with Bernie's derailment stayed away or voted third party. That is why this man-child is going to be president for the next four years.

But I do still have hope that there will be reform ahead because the American people are resourceful, intelligent and decent. I think they just have to stop making elections about things like race, religion, abortion, guns and immigration and they need to go back and focus on infrastructure, health care and the economy. The hatred that has built up over this election is greater than anything I have ever witnessed and is akin to a type of social war built along rural-urban lines which reflect the lifestyle and beliefs of the relative populations. But this is no way to run a country or vote for a president.

Voting for change is all well and good but would you switch mechanics and have your car repaired by someone who has never done it before? For this is what Americans have ostensibly done. The fallacy is that Trump is a successful businessman when in fact he leaves a trail of failed ventures and settled lawsuits that number in the thousands.

No this was clearly a protest vote and rejection of the way Washington is run. The downtrodden don't like elitists telling them things and not delivering and they are unhappy with what the global economic downturn has done to their lives. Donald Trump has only helped their ills by doing his business abroad like everyone else.

Once people realize this is not the man to do it, the sleeves will be rolled up and the real change must begin. They might want to start by reforming the electoral college.

Instead of "Making America Great Again" let's settle for a new slogan in "As Little Damage as Possible Please!".

http://michaelmoore.com/trumpwillwin/

Comments

  1. This morning I'm feeling pretty distraught over the election. At least under Obama's administration we had him in the White House, a Supreme Court that seemed relatively responsible, and the Fed which seems to be doing its best. Now we have an entirely different situation.

    The Republicans (many of whom espouse Tea Party-like messaging) have control of the House, Senate, and White House. They will undoubtedly promote a Supreme Court justice that supports their policies, and rumors are circulating that they may upend the Fed.

    I seem to be obsessed with following the latest news, unable to let go and move on. I heard that Trump will be featured on tonight's 60 Minutes. At first I thought that I must plan to watch it. But now I think the healthier option for me is to tune out, maybe go see a movie. Anything but watch that Humpty Dumpty strut and preen.

    I have plans to join the TDoR event in San Francisco next Sunday. I think it's more important than ever for us to join as a community, stand tall, and show the world that we're all in this together. It's not a zero sum game. 1 + 1 can very well be, and should be, greater than 2.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

prejudice disguised as objective rectitude

So here is Professor Jordan Peterson perhaps justly calling out the excesses of political correctness gone mad. But then he extends it to not indulging transgender people the basic dignity of being addressed in their preferred pronoun. To do so for him would cost nothing and to stand on literal principle seems to serve little use other than to send a message of disdain.

If you have transitioned or even live as the opposite gender is costs me nothing to address you in your preferred pronouns. What difference does it make to me and what am I trying to tell you when I don't?

Peterson wants to stand on his rights to call reality what it is except that in this case the exact objective escapes me. But of course the right wing Federalist is in love with him because he calls a spade a spade.

If I see a rock I can call it that but then the rock doesn’t have any feelings. To address a transgender woman "her" and "she" is not undermining my rights as a person in any way b…

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.

the pseudoscience behind gender dysphoria

The real science as to what causes gender dysphoria still awaits.

Harry Benjamin was on to something except he didn’t have the scientific evidence to back up his suspicions hence, like a true scientist, he negated to draw conclusions. His hunch, based on treating so many patients over his lifetime, was that one is born with a predisposition to be gender dysphoric.

However, with inconclusive brain scans and no DNA marker (as of yet) we are left with believing the word of people who need help and only want to lead happy and productive lives.

The best we have been able to muster since Benjamin's death in 1986 was to amass statistics on who gets a boner imagining themselves as a woman which is in equal parts pathetic and disappointing. For this is not really science at all but is instead playing with interview data that doesn't point to anything definitive or conclusive. I have dealt with this problem at great length in my blog.

The whole thing started with Kurt Freund's obses…