Skip to main content

the new age of demagoguery

Henceforth demagogues are going to have an easier time of it because we live in an era of subjective truth. Whatever you believe will have you find your kindred spirits out there in cyberspace.

This is what allowed Donald Trump to win the presidential election and will embolden the more subversive elements of society to think his victory represents approval of their ideas. Immediately following the election there was reporting of random acts of violence against muslims.

We are entering dangerous territory here and it’s driving a bigger wedge between progressives and regressives (read GOP here or other right leaning party). You don't believe in climate change? Don't worry you will find a pseudoscientist willing to endorse your position.

In the early to middle part of the with century we suffered from the lack of free propagation of information which allowed people like Mussolini or Hitler to control the masses by feeding and withholding in order to advance their agenda. Today it is too much false and misleading information that holds us captive.

I hate to sound elitist but a huge segment of the world population is under educated and more prone to be led by the nose than free thinkers. This is why when despots take power they typically jail or dispose of the intellectuals who are more prone to lead dissent. The world needs to develop strong and independent grass roots media to combat this trend. No place more important than the United States where the big outlets are owned by special interests.

Speaking of intellectuals, here is Noam Chomsky on Trump and protectionist hysteria...

Comments

  1. I didn't want Trump to run for president, nor to win primaries, nor to win the nomination, nor to become president-elect. I did NOT vote for Trump. I think some people in protest movement are practicing the demagoguery they fear. Donald Trump is president-elect but he isn't president. He hasn't made a single decision that directly affects the lives of others. His appalling rhetoric is just that and nothing more. His words are empty words. There may come a time when protests are required, but IMO that day hasn't arrived.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't understand "His appalling rhetoric is just that and nothing more." Take a look at the people he's putting into his administration! Consider the fact that all too soon he will be President.

      Unfortunately I believe that we will have all too many times for protests later. That time starts now, though. The leadership in government as well as the DNC, as well as the 50% of the population that didn't vote, must hear our voices. Otherwise we will get whatever they dish out and it will be too late to complain.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

prejudice disguised as objective rectitude

So here is Professor Jordan Peterson perhaps justly calling out the excesses of political correctness gone mad. But then he extends it to not indulging transgender people the basic dignity of being addressed in their preferred pronoun. To do so for him would cost nothing and to stand on literal principle seems to serve little use other than to send a message of disdain.

If you have transitioned or even live as the opposite gender is costs me nothing to address you in your preferred pronouns. What difference does it make to me and what am I trying to tell you when I don't?

Peterson wants to stand on his rights to call reality what it is except that in this case the exact objective escapes me. But of course the right wing Federalist is in love with him because he calls a spade a spade.

If I see a rock I can call it that but then the rock doesn’t have any feelings. To address a transgender woman "her" and "she" is not undermining my rights as a person in any way b…

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.

the pseudoscience behind gender dysphoria

The real science as to what causes gender dysphoria still awaits.

Harry Benjamin was on to something except he didn’t have the scientific evidence to back up his suspicions hence, like a true scientist, he negated to draw conclusions. His hunch, based on treating so many patients over his lifetime, was that one is born with a predisposition to be gender dysphoric.

However, with inconclusive brain scans and no DNA marker (as of yet) we are left with believing the word of people who need help and only want to lead happy and productive lives.

The best we have been able to muster since Benjamin's death in 1986 was to amass statistics on who gets a boner imagining themselves as a woman which is in equal parts pathetic and disappointing. For this is not really science at all but is instead playing with interview data that doesn't point to anything definitive or conclusive. I have dealt with this problem at great length in my blog.

The whole thing started with Kurt Freund's obses…