Skip to main content

the new age of demagoguery

Henceforth demagogues are going to have an easier time of it because we live in an era of subjective truth. Whatever you believe will have you find your kindred spirits out there in cyberspace.

This is what allowed Donald Trump to win the presidential election and will embolden the more subversive elements of society to think his victory represents approval of their ideas. Immediately following the election there was reporting of random acts of violence against muslims.

We are entering dangerous territory here and it’s driving a bigger wedge between progressives and regressives (read GOP here or other right leaning party). You don't believe in climate change? Don't worry you will find a pseudoscientist willing to endorse your position.

In the early to middle part of the with century we suffered from the lack of free propagation of information which allowed people like Mussolini or Hitler to control the masses by feeding and withholding in order to advance their agenda. Today it is too much false and misleading information that holds us captive.

I hate to sound elitist but a huge segment of the world population is under educated and more prone to be led by the nose than free thinkers. This is why when despots take power they typically jail or dispose of the intellectuals who are more prone to lead dissent. The world needs to develop strong and independent grass roots media to combat this trend. No place more important than the United States where the big outlets are owned by special interests.

Speaking of intellectuals, here is Noam Chomsky on Trump and protectionist hysteria...

Comments

  1. I didn't want Trump to run for president, nor to win primaries, nor to win the nomination, nor to become president-elect. I did NOT vote for Trump. I think some people in protest movement are practicing the demagoguery they fear. Donald Trump is president-elect but he isn't president. He hasn't made a single decision that directly affects the lives of others. His appalling rhetoric is just that and nothing more. His words are empty words. There may come a time when protests are required, but IMO that day hasn't arrived.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't understand "His appalling rhetoric is just that and nothing more." Take a look at the people he's putting into his administration! Consider the fact that all too soon he will be President.

      Unfortunately I believe that we will have all too many times for protests later. That time starts now, though. The leadership in government as well as the DNC, as well as the 50% of the population that didn't vote, must hear our voices. Otherwise we will get whatever they dish out and it will be too late to complain.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

the pseudoscience behind gender dysphoria

The real science as to what causes gender dysphoria still awaits.

Harry Benjamin was on to something except he didn’t have the scientific evidence to back up his suspicions hence, like a true scientist, he negated to draw conclusions. His hunch, based on treating so many patients over his lifetime, was that one is born with a predisposition to be gender dysphoric.

However, with inconclusive brain scans and no DNA marker (as of yet) we are left with believing the word of people who need help and only want to lead happy and productive lives.

The best we have been able to muster since Benjamin's death in 1986 was to amass statistics on who gets a boner imagining themselves as a woman which is in equal parts pathetic and disappointing. For this is not really science at all but is instead playing with interview data that doesn't point to anything definitive or conclusive. I have dealt with this problem at great length in my blog.

The whole thing started with Kurt Freund's obses…

looking past cross gender arousal

Jack’s latest Crossdreamers post got me thinking about cross gender arousal and how it could be avoided; also whether it even matters. This with particular focus on the inability to relate of someone on the outside looking in.

You see, sexuality is a very complicated thing to begin with and when you then add gender identity ambiguity it becomes a recipe to really confuse someone.

So imagine that you are a little boy who identifies as a girl but then along comes puberty and short circuits everything by having the sex you identify with also be the sex you are attracted to. For in essence this is what happens to all all male to female gender dysphoric trans persons who are attracted to women.

So I ask myself: can I imagine a scenario where this inherent contradiction would not produce sexual confusion? The answer is that I cannot.

I am in the unique position, like many of you, to have experienced an early identification with the feminine become sexualized later on. This brought confusion…

understanding the erotic component

I have written about crossed wires before in two separate posts. The idea is that one cannot pass through puberty and the development of sexual feelings for females and not have your pre-existing gender dysphoria be impacted through your psychosexual development. The hormone responsible for your libido is testosterone which is present in much stronger concentration in males and is why gynephilics are most likely to experience erotic overtones as the conflict between romantic external feelings and their pull towards the feminine become permanently intertwined.

Because I came from a deeply religious family where sex was not discussed much at all, I grew up with little access to information and was very much ignorant of matters relating to the subject. With no firsthand experience in intercourse until I married I was then faced with the reality that my ability to perform sexually had been deeply impacted by my dysphoric feelings. This began years of turmoil and self-deprecating thoughts …