Skip to main content

an end to plutocracy

I was very glad to see that the Austrians chose to elect a left leaning president. Had the populist right wing candidate won, it would have signaled a new openness in Europe towards the alt-right movement which rejects minorities and anyone that is different.

Brexit was in part motivated by this type of thinking whereby ordinary working class Britons feared a loss of their autonomy and all things traditionally British. Some of them pined for a return to a world that no longer exists and this vote was seen as a way to stem the tide. Such is the frustration among the working class which also impacted the US elections.

We can see that we are at a global crossroads where the world’s resources are very unevenly parsed out. My own city continues to see a rise of destitute people as do many of yours. It would be easy to blame these people are freeloaders but the truth is that the marginalized increasingly have less places to go.

In America many of the jobs no one wanted were taken by Mexican migrants but only because conditions were even worse in their own country. As fortunes have changed some of these people have returned to their homeland and are leaving some voids in the more mundane physical work that must be done; the work that most Americans don’t want or cannot perform because it simply does not pay a fair wage.

In the 1950’s an American auto worker could support a family and have his wife stay at home with the children. We now have a situation whereby two University educated young adults cannot even afford a down payment on a home that often costs more than 4 times their combined salaries. In my own country an increase to just 6% in the interest rate would see many of these Millenials lose their homes.

What to do about the void in the working class is not going to be easily resolved. But it is clear that not everyone can re-train in other sectors because we are all limited by our capabilities as individuals.

Neo-Liberalism's current modus operandi is to leave the working class to their own devices. With no minimal safety net and with their jobs outsourced to third world countries these people need to find some form of recourse.

If the Democrats, who are in bed with Wall Street and other corporate lobbyists, cannot do it then someone else will have to. The Republicans have proven to be even worse hypocrites as they pretend to be defenders of the common man and his values while lining their own pockets; all the while using flag waving jingoism and a propensity for militarism as a decoy. You may have noticed that most of the leaders in both parties are either millionaires or billionaires which only helps to ensure a more myopic and self-interested vision of the state of affairs.

It might be time to put an end to plutocratic rule.


Comments

  1. The Austrian case might have been caused by protest voters choking on their protest. In other words: Some might feel comfortable about giving the elite a message by voting for extremist if they believe the extremist won't win. After Brexit and Trump, however, that is no longer a safe assumption.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jack you are right that no assumption can be made in this global climate. There has never been a period in my lifetime where I have been so concerned about the fragility of the state of affairs particularly as it relates to income disparity...

      Delete
  2. What strikes me as very interesting about income disparity is that it is not necessarily the real income of people that creates a reaction. They may even find their salaries increasing and still feel the anger. (Most Trump voters are not poor).

    The Nazi take-over in Germany has often been explained as the end result of a FEAR of becoming poor and/or losing social status. This may be the case now too. On top of that the increasing differences in income creates a strong feeling of injustice.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. you have a good point Jack but don't forget that actual buying power has gone down drastically for a shrinking middle class that has less options than ever and this is causing a great deal of distress. That one percent at the top is getting increasingly rich while everyone else a little poorer. That is ultimately unsustainable...

      Delete
    2. and you are right in that fear of change is a great motivator towards adoption of prejudiced thinking and racism.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

prejudice disguised as objective rectitude

So here is Professor Jordan Peterson perhaps justly calling out the excesses of political correctness gone mad. But then he extends it to not indulging transgender people the basic dignity of being addressed in their preferred pronoun. To do so for him would cost nothing and to stand on literal principle seems to serve little use other than to send a message of disdain.

If you have transitioned or even live as the opposite gender is costs me nothing to address you in your preferred pronouns. What difference does it make to me and what am I trying to tell you when I don't?

Peterson wants to stand on his rights to call reality what it is except that in this case the exact objective escapes me. But of course the right wing Federalist is in love with him because he calls a spade a spade.

If I see a rock I can call it that but then the rock doesn’t have any feelings. To address a transgender woman "her" and "she" is not undermining my rights as a person in any way b…

looking past cross gender arousal

Jack’s latest Crossdreamers post got me thinking about cross gender arousal and how it could be avoided; also whether it even matters. This with particular focus on the inability to relate of someone on the outside looking in.

You see, sexuality is a very complicated thing to begin with and when you then add gender identity ambiguity it becomes a recipe to really confuse someone.

So imagine that you are a little boy who identifies as a girl but then along comes puberty and short circuits everything by having the sex you identify with also be the sex you are attracted to. For in essence this is what happens to all all male to female gender dysphoric trans persons who are attracted to women.

So I ask myself: can I imagine a scenario where this inherent contradiction would not produce sexual confusion? The answer is that I cannot.

I am in the unique position, like many of you, to have experienced an early identification with the feminine become sexualized later on. This brought confusion…

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.