Skip to main content

what to do

Mainstream conservatives in the United States have a problem.

With the rising polarization in the country, the conspiracy nuts and outright racist elements of the new alternative right (or alt-right) movement are forcing these more conventional believers to respond. For this new extremist element is risking polluting the waters of their tamer if not overly appealing doctrine.

The rise of the internet echo chamber which includes Conservative talk radio, FOX News and thinly veiled racist websites like Breibart have only fed the new appetite for extremism which is now flirting with increasingly dangerous ideas.

Old school conservatism along the style of a Barry Goldwater was more rooted in fiscal policies which included guaranteeing state rights and reducing the influence of the federal government, but with the passage of time more radical thinking had begun to enter into the ideology. The left also has its problems, but I more concerned about the right since moving further along on the current path can mean adopting more fascist type thinking. Besides, the United States has a much larger aversion towards leftist ideologies as witnessed by the McCarthy witch hunts of the 1950's, the longstanding Cold War and its policies towards Cuba.

Today's Democratic Party is hardly even progressive given its penchant for focusing on opening up global markets and helping Wall Street and the big banks to operate regulation free; hence the backlash from today's millenials who have a different set of priorities.

In fact it is probably the lack of a true progressive movement that has left the American blue collar worker high and dry.

I saw a video recently on YouTube where a woman in a Michael’s store was becoming belligerent because she was asked to purchase a bag for one dollar due to her item being too large for a conventional store bag. She was being served by two African American women. Suddenly out of the blue she goes into a tirade and states very vocally about not having to put up with this in Trump’s America. The presumption was that she was not being treated fairly as a white citizen. The two women do their best to calm her down and yet she continues on for about 10 minutes at high volume.

Clearly the nuts have been emboldened.

It will be interesting to see what these more mainstream conservatives react to this potential polluting of their political gene pool. The Tea Party looks tame compared to the alt-right loonies.

I think now of people like John McCain, Conodoleeza Rice, Colin Powell or even strategist and former Bush speech writer David Frum who are not often accused of fanning the flames of extremist thinking. Will they help smother them instead?

Comments

  1. Joanna,
    Just one comment. Many historians see Goldwater's state's rights platform to be a veiled attempt to maintain the status quo in the racist south. Goldwater was a racist just one that was smart enough to hide the fact.

    ReplyDelete
  2. no you are right about this Leann except that these new guys are another notch or two above him!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

prejudice disguised as objective rectitude

So here is Professor Jordan Peterson perhaps justly calling out the excesses of political correctness gone mad. But then he extends it to not indulging transgender people the basic dignity of being addressed in their preferred pronoun. To do so for him would cost nothing and to stand on literal principle seems to serve little use other than to send a message of disdain.

If you have transitioned or even live as the opposite gender is costs me nothing to address you in your preferred pronouns. What difference does it make to me and what am I trying to tell you when I don't?

Peterson wants to stand on his rights to call reality what it is except that in this case the exact objective escapes me. But of course the right wing Federalist is in love with him because he calls a spade a spade.

If I see a rock I can call it that but then the rock doesn’t have any feelings. To address a transgender woman "her" and "she" is not undermining my rights as a person in any way b…

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.

looking past cross gender arousal

Jack’s latest Crossdreamers post got me thinking about cross gender arousal and how it could be avoided; also whether it even matters. This with particular focus on the inability to relate of someone on the outside looking in.

You see, sexuality is a very complicated thing to begin with and when you then add gender identity ambiguity it becomes a recipe to really confuse someone.

So imagine that you are a little boy who identifies as a girl but then along comes puberty and short circuits everything by having the sex you identify with also be the sex you are attracted to. For in essence this is what happens to all all male to female gender dysphoric trans persons who are attracted to women.

So I ask myself: can I imagine a scenario where this inherent contradiction would not produce sexual confusion? The answer is that I cannot.

I am in the unique position, like many of you, to have experienced an early identification with the feminine become sexualized later on. This brought confusion…