Skip to main content

counting on them to do their job

Donald Trump does not have the maturity and disposition that a President of such a large nation requires; come to think of it neither does Vladimir Putin.

I used to think that the United States was above electing such unqualified candidates but then here we are and it has culminated in a man child president who jousts with the media over crowd size. You would show him a picture of his inauguration attendance compared to Obama’s and he would tell you the photo was doctored or that terrorists from Mexico kept the crowds away.

This is not a mature man and considering his age all the more surprising.

I believe that getting what you want your whole life and having sycophants nod in agreement to your every pronouncement breeds this kind of psychopathy. At this juncture in a life it cannot be undone which would be fine if he didn’t have the nuclear codes at his fingertips. By this reality we are all held hostage to a man who lives by “alternative facts”.

The media must hold such an attitude accountable and not state that “Trump said this....” but rather state clearly that it is a falsehood.

It’s all well and good to have alternative media that champions it’s own side but the mainstream media needs to put on its big boy pants and start doing it’s job because the United States doesn't want to model itself after Russia where press conferences are nothing more than soliloquies from a man who has declared himself emperor.

Sean Spicer has the unenviable task of spinning these absurdities while trying not to appear imbecilic in front of the American press corps. The job of soft-peddling the pronouncements of his petulant and thin-skinned boss is something you couldn't pay me enough to do. My self respect is worth much more than that.

I might also suggest that instead of listening to chief strategist and Alt-right Rottweiler Steve Bannon who should keep his own mouth shut, the media should doggedly insistent on truth telling as the White House paints them as liars as a counter attack to Trump's conflict with the truth.

Comments

  1. Whine, whine, whine. Would you like some cheese to go with your endless whining.ROFLMAO

    ReplyDelete
  2. At least someone finds this cabal amusing. Unfortunately I don't...

    ReplyDelete
  3. I am with you on this Joanna. The person now occupying the White House is truly scary, especially given the people that he surrounds himself with. He has no conception of our Constitutional guarantees and protections nor does he want to familiarize himself with them. He rather spend his time attacking people on twitter on matters that have nothing to do with running the Country. The scariest part is that his supporters are just like him. Rather than rationally discuss issues, they do what he does: resort to name calling and childish responses. It is so sad that this exists in our Country.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I have zero sympathy for Sean Spicer. He knew what he was getting into and chose to do the job. My sense from watching him is that he's as sold on Trump's nonsense as Trump and all of his cronies are.

    Regarding Bannon: As far as I can tell the media is far from backing off. His and Trump's taunts are only increasing the media's focus on showing the world what is really going on, and they are mincing their language. The media is performing an even more important role now than ever.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I meant to say that the media is *not* mincing their language!

      But I do agree with Joanna that the potential for huge damage is there. I'm hoping more than ever that our system of checks and balances, as well as common sense and sense of future, is going to emerge for our legislatures, courts, and other politicos.

      Did you see Jerry Brown's speech last week? Wow! Awesome! I'm proud to have him as our governor.

      Delete
  5. Kristina/Emma I am hoping that the damage to your country is minimal but the potential is most certainly there...

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

prejudice disguised as objective rectitude

So here is Professor Jordan Peterson perhaps justly calling out the excesses of political correctness gone mad. But then he extends it to not indulging transgender people the basic dignity of being addressed in their preferred pronoun. To do so for him would cost nothing and to stand on literal principle seems to serve little use other than to send a message of disdain.

If you have transitioned or even live as the opposite gender is costs me nothing to address you in your preferred pronouns. What difference does it make to me and what am I trying to tell you when I don't?

Peterson wants to stand on his rights to call reality what it is except that in this case the exact objective escapes me. But of course the right wing Federalist is in love with him because he calls a spade a spade.

If I see a rock I can call it that but then the rock doesn’t have any feelings. To address a transgender woman "her" and "she" is not undermining my rights as a person in any way b…

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.

the pseudoscience behind gender dysphoria

The real science as to what causes gender dysphoria still awaits.

Harry Benjamin was on to something except he didn’t have the scientific evidence to back up his suspicions hence, like a true scientist, he negated to draw conclusions. His hunch, based on treating so many patients over his lifetime, was that one is born with a predisposition to be gender dysphoric.

However, with inconclusive brain scans and no DNA marker (as of yet) we are left with believing the word of people who need help and only want to lead happy and productive lives.

The best we have been able to muster since Benjamin's death in 1986 was to amass statistics on who gets a boner imagining themselves as a woman which is in equal parts pathetic and disappointing. For this is not really science at all but is instead playing with interview data that doesn't point to anything definitive or conclusive. I have dealt with this problem at great length in my blog.

The whole thing started with Kurt Freund's obses…