Skip to main content

Harry Benjamin's legacy

Emma forwarded to me a very interesting article written by Richard Ekins from the University of Ulster in the U.K. titled “Science, Politics and Clinical Intervention: Harry Benjamin, Transsexualism and the problem of Heteronormativity”. It was published in a periodical called “Sexualities” in 2005.

It is a fascinating read and covers Benjamin’s history of publishing on transvestism and transsexualism from 1948 through to 1979 when he wrote his last publications.

Benjamin believed wholeheartedly in a biological explanation. He wrote in 1967:

“Most satisfying to me is a working hypothesis based on the experiments of brain physiologists and psycho-biologists . . . Their possible explanation for the transsexual phenomenon would be neuroendocrine in nature . . . If something interferes, perhaps an abundance of the mother’s estrogen or lack of response of the neural target organ, this particular center (a hypothalamic brain center) remains female, determining the later sexual behavior and possibly causing gender role disorientation”

But he also believed causation could be influenced by childhood conditioning which could possibly help reinforce it.

In the very beginning of his writings, Benjamin made clearer distinctions between transvestites and transsexuals but as time wore on he began to see a type of progressive disconnect from one's birth sex which led to his fashioning a six type SOS scale:

Group 1
Type I - Pseudo TV
Type II - Fetishistic TV
Type III - True TV

Group 2
Type IV - TS, Nonsurgical

Group 3
Type V - TS, - Moderate intensity
Type VI - TS, - High intensity

In 1953 he wrote:

“The most disturbed group of male transvestites are those who want to be changed into women, even anatomically. They are the transsexualists.’

The term gender dysphoria was not yet in existence and Benjamin stuck with his disorientation terminology. He also noted that his high intensity patients (types V and VI) were in his words “invariably homosexual”

From 1955 through 1966 Benjamin treated approximately 350 patients at the end of which he produced his magnum opus “The Transsexual Phenomenon”. During this phase he also began to make the clear distinction between sex and gender where sex was the libido and gender the internal identity. He stated “transsexualism is a sex and gender problem” and noted that the origin of the condition was still largely an obscure one.

From 1967 through 1979 he saw an additional 1,200 patients and further consolidated his position on transsexuality and, once again, emphasized its biological etiology by stating:

“Gender identity is so firmly established by the age of four that traditional psychotherapeutic approaches have been quite unsuccessful in resolving adult gender identity conflict"


He also described the principal distinction between transvestites and transsexuals as:

"....the degree of gender discomfort and the measures necessary to relieve that discomfort”

Ekins concludes the article with a fascinating text stating that Benjamin worked within the hetero-normative framework of his time and, since transgender people are today pushing against that envelope, it might open up varying options for clinicians:

“Psychiatrists and other health professionals work very much from the center. They are engaged in what might be termed a socio-practical activity in the world as it is, rather than as it might be. More specifically, they are in the business of trying to relieve individual distress in an imperfect world. If, in doing so, they reinforce an allegedly outmoded binary gender divide, so be it, they might well reply.

Perhaps, the most radical intervention that can be expected from clinicians is that if transgender people choose to put themselves on the front line by living daily in ways that challenge the binary divide, then it should be the work of any clinicians whom they consult to help them. Clinicians at the forefront of transgender clinical intervention are now beginning to articulate that standpoint (Bockting and Coleman, 1992). Furthermore, these same clinicians (Bockting, 1997a, 1997b, 1999) are beginning to detail something of the complexities of transgender sexualities ‘beyond’ the ‘heterosexual imaginary.

As this line of development gains momentum, it will become increasingly necessary to revisit Harry Benjamin’s legacy, but a legacy shorn of its heteronormative cast, if his pioneering work is to maintain a contemporary impact. This article is offered as an initial contribution to that enterprise.”

Comments

  1. Hi Joanna, very glad to hear how much that article interested you. As I think you know I've only recently been digging into "older" transgender research, and have been reading (and loving) The Transsexual Phenomenon. With so much change and advancement during our lives I suppose it's normal that I tend to discount older works on the assumption that so much more is known now and that old stuff is old hat and dated. It's truly amazing and affirming how much Harry Benjamin discovered, documented, and understood for all transgender people.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. by far the largest patient history over his many years in practice and probably the most humane of the bunch.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

looking past cross gender arousal

Jack’s latest Crossdreamers post got me thinking about cross gender arousal and how it could be avoided; also whether it even matters. This with particular focus on the inability to relate of someone on the outside looking in.

You see, sexuality is a very complicated thing to begin with and when you then add gender identity ambiguity it becomes a recipe to really confuse someone.

So imagine that you are a little boy who identifies as a girl but then along comes puberty and short circuits everything by having the sex you identify with also be the sex you are attracted to. For in essence this is what happens to all all male to female gender dysphoric trans persons who are attracted to women.

So I ask myself: can I imagine a scenario where this inherent contradiction would not produce sexual confusion? The answer is that I cannot.

I am in the unique position, like many of you, to have experienced an early identification with the feminine become sexualized later on. This brought confusion…

understanding the erotic component

I have written about crossed wires before in two separate posts. The idea is that one cannot pass through puberty and the development of sexual feelings for females and not have your pre-existing gender dysphoria be impacted through your psychosexual development. The hormone responsible for your libido is testosterone which is present in much stronger concentration in males and is why gynephilics are most likely to experience erotic overtones as the conflict between romantic external feelings and their pull towards the feminine become permanently intertwined.

Because I came from a deeply religious family where sex was not discussed much at all, I grew up with little access to information and was very much ignorant of matters relating to the subject. With no firsthand experience in intercourse until I married I was then faced with the reality that my ability to perform sexually had been deeply impacted by my dysphoric feelings. This began years of turmoil and self-deprecating thoughts …

a blending

An interesting thing is happening to me: as I have fully embraced being transgender my male and female anima are becoming blended. The female side is no longer an unwelcome appendage which, as a result, has allowed me to craft a more genuine and happier male image.

I dress when I want to and sometimes I cut outings shorter than before. I am my own master in this regard and feel in control.

Don't get me wrong in that the dysphoria is not going away and is sometimes like a wild stallion that threatens to jump the fence but I have learnt to understand it’s demands after all these years hence a transition for me is definitely not in the cards. At this point I am not even foreseeing a social one.

The two sides are no longer in conflict and they are now intertwined to create a fusion that is unique to me. That answer finally came when I reached a full level of self assurance about who I am and learned to embrace that I am trans and yes, that includes my dysphoria's erotic undertones…