Skip to main content

Trump's America

There is absolutely no doubt that Donald Trump is a narcissist. But you don’t need to trust me on this as plenty of noted experts have already weighed in on this issue and consider him a textbook case. I would find it amusing when, on national television, he extols his proficiency at every known subject were it not for the fact that it scares me to death that he leads an entire nation
.
However, the more pertinent question at hand is whether his pathology is as dangerous as Adolf Hitler’s or Idi Amin’s and could put America at peril. I for one think that it potentially could were it not for the checks and balances built into the American constitution.

Trump isn't a dyed in the wool conservative. He is all over the place politically but he is ambitious and his ego has no boundaries. He proved to be a formidable foe to GOP candidates who couldn't deal with his television showmanship as he sold himself as both traditionalist republican and Robin Hood to a beleaguered working class which used to be the territory of the Democrats before they sold out to Wall Street.

Dubbya wasn’t the brightest president but at least he was surrounded by a less radical and more capable cabal. One could argue that Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice were a good counterbalance to the more Machiavellian Dick Cheney who now looks awfully good compared to the likes of the extremist Steve Bannon.

Trump’s base is not composed of intellectually gifted souls and they have been shown in recent polls to be as gullible as preschoolers; he could tell them anything and they would swallow it hook line and sinker. The ones who are smart are using Trump to leverage their own agendas such as Bannon’s alt-right group, the Christian Conservatives who see this as a chance to move us back to the middle ages and an assortment of one issue voters such as those who think everyone should be armed to the teeth.

These are not the best of times for America or for the world.

In my own Province xenophobia runs rampant as that Quebec mosque shooter turned out to be a Trumpist with a rabid hatred of all Muslims. A friend of his stated recently in the media that he never thought he was actually capable of opening fire on a bunch of innocent people.

The Americas were invaded by people who came from predominantly Christian nations who then used their power to enslave and destroy the native populations and then pillage Africa in order to find a cheap source of labor. This may not be a convenient reminder to many but the fact is that humanity is full of awful people who will do terrible things to each other. My native Spain did a wealth of damage in Mexico, Latin and South America and used the profits to build gold encrusted Cathedrals.

Seeing people with different customs and manner of dress offends some people and the new caustic environment where a radical group known as ISIS who purports to speak for Islam but is nothing more than a bunch of terrorists is having dire impacts on innocent Muslims who only want to live in peace.

But in Trump’s America it's about getting vengeance on convenient targets to cover for their own ambitions and goals. In that light its politically expedient to call Mexicans rapists and see Muslims as radicals intent of imposing themselves on a Christian nation.

After all its easier to find straw men than to look in the mirror and solve the real problems at hand.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PS: as a side note, Trump would do well do rid himself of Sean Spicer who recently tweeted out an article in the Onion clearly lampooning him as a purveyor of misinformation. Spicer proudly distributed the article clearly not comprehending the intent by stating "You Nailed it. Period!" proving he suffers from mental laziness or is an idiot. Mind you, Trump would then have to find someone with enough cheek to stand in front of the press corps and lie through his teeth while keeping a straight face.

Comments

  1. Maybe if Trump replaced Spicer with someone without teeth the lying might be easier. (This is a joke.)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

prejudice disguised as objective rectitude

So here is Professor Jordan Peterson perhaps justly calling out the excesses of political correctness gone mad. But then he extends it to not indulging transgender people the basic dignity of being addressed in their preferred pronoun. To do so for him would cost nothing and to stand on literal principle seems to serve little use other than to send a message of disdain.

If you have transitioned or even live as the opposite gender is costs me nothing to address you in your preferred pronouns. What difference does it make to me and what am I trying to tell you when I don't?

Peterson wants to stand on his rights to call reality what it is except that in this case the exact objective escapes me. But of course the right wing Federalist is in love with him because he calls a spade a spade.

If I see a rock I can call it that but then the rock doesn’t have any feelings. To address a transgender woman "her" and "she" is not undermining my rights as a person in any way b…

looking past cross gender arousal

Jack’s latest Crossdreamers post got me thinking about cross gender arousal and how it could be avoided; also whether it even matters. This with particular focus on the inability to relate of someone on the outside looking in.

You see, sexuality is a very complicated thing to begin with and when you then add gender identity ambiguity it becomes a recipe to really confuse someone.

So imagine that you are a little boy who identifies as a girl but then along comes puberty and short circuits everything by having the sex you identify with also be the sex you are attracted to. For in essence this is what happens to all all male to female gender dysphoric trans persons who are attracted to women.

So I ask myself: can I imagine a scenario where this inherent contradiction would not produce sexual confusion? The answer is that I cannot.

I am in the unique position, like many of you, to have experienced an early identification with the feminine become sexualized later on. This brought confusion…

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.