Skip to main content

after the carnage

No the fascism that plagued Europe in the early 20th century isn't coming back. After all, that included an important element of expansionism and killing or imprisoning of dissenters. However where the overlap lies is in the blaming of immigrants for what ills a nation.

In places like eastern Europe we are seeing a stronger response from what used to be fringe groups. France has its own nationalist party under Marine Le Pen and even after Brexit you began to see chest beating among Britons who pined for a more monolithic culture before their emerald isle was invaded by foreigners.

The United States under that insufferable windbag Donald Trump is now appealing to low brow sentiment through the smoke screen of blaming media, the courts and immigrants for the nation’s malady. Let's recall that Hitler’s early foray into power saw the same attempts at discrediting the Jewish media and indeed chief propagandist Joseph Goebbels was charged with the campaign to undermine their credibility. Hitler also set up a people's court once he began to see that rulings were not going his way.

Starting to see the parallels?

But while fascism the way it once was may not see a return, we are seeing signs that democracy is under attack. Not that true democracies actually exist mind you, just that the current flawed models are being challenged.

In the United States it’s income disparity and unfairness that threatens the country's health and Trump will ravage the base that helped propel him to power by applying the principles dear to the hearts of conservatives. As the ruling elite of both parties line their pockets the disenfranchised will eventually realise that they are being duped and even the jingoistic Trump rallies won’t be enough to mask the reality that America is actually an unbalanced oligarchy. Even his intellectually challenged base will get the message.

By the end of Trump's tenure, I am counting on the intelligent and tech savvy millennials to see through the charade and use their country’s constitutional protections to remake the country in proper fashion.

The carnage that this idiot president will most assuredly leave behind will hopefully be sufficient argument to try a better form of governing; one that actually looks after the needs of the populace.

Secular Talk's Kyle Kulinski is one of those Millenials who is really pissed and for good reason....



Comments

  1. I absolutely agree with everything you said. As an US citizen, I am appalled with this clown that was elected President. I am also saddened that the a portion of the electorate in this Country was duped into voting for this carnival barker. I am also frightened that there are people who have, and still, ardently support him.

    ReplyDelete
  2. those people that voted for him were indeed duped but it wont take long for the shine from the apple to wear thin and they will realize that there is a better way. Perhaps this is the right amount of toxin that is required in order to instill real change in America which means a return to the principles of a fair and just society.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think Trump's administration's days are numbered. Maybe that's wishful thinking but I watched almost all of the House Intelligence Committee's public meeting this morning when they interviewed James Comey (FBI) and Mike Rogers (NSA). Those guys may not be telling the entire truth but I trusted them at their word, which says that they really are doing a full-fledged investigation of the Trump group's involvement with the Russians and other things. Unfortunately there is no timeframe for their conclusions.

    I also read that Trump's approval rating is 38% now and his disapproval rating is 58% so the Republicans who keep defending and supporting him must start wondering if they should stick it out with that sinking ship. Their judgement will look terrible as Trump's ratings continue to decline and especially if Trump's ties to Russia come out.

    I can't wait...

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

prejudice disguised as objective rectitude

So here is Professor Jordan Peterson perhaps justly calling out the excesses of political correctness gone mad. But then he extends it to not indulging transgender people the basic dignity of being addressed in their preferred pronoun. To do so for him would cost nothing and to stand on literal principle seems to serve little use other than to send a message of disdain.

If you have transitioned or even live as the opposite gender is costs me nothing to address you in your preferred pronouns. What difference does it make to me and what am I trying to tell you when I don't?

Peterson wants to stand on his rights to call reality what it is except that in this case the exact objective escapes me. But of course the right wing Federalist is in love with him because he calls a spade a spade.

If I see a rock I can call it that but then the rock doesn’t have any feelings. To address a transgender woman "her" and "she" is not undermining my rights as a person in any way b…

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.

the pseudoscience behind gender dysphoria

The real science as to what causes gender dysphoria still awaits.

Harry Benjamin was on to something except he didn’t have the scientific evidence to back up his suspicions hence, like a true scientist, he negated to draw conclusions. His hunch, based on treating so many patients over his lifetime, was that one is born with a predisposition to be gender dysphoric.

However, with inconclusive brain scans and no DNA marker (as of yet) we are left with believing the word of people who need help and only want to lead happy and productive lives.

The best we have been able to muster since Benjamin's death in 1986 was to amass statistics on who gets a boner imagining themselves as a woman which is in equal parts pathetic and disappointing. For this is not really science at all but is instead playing with interview data that doesn't point to anything definitive or conclusive. I have dealt with this problem at great length in my blog.

The whole thing started with Kurt Freund's obses…