Skip to main content

an old broken record

Kay Brown runs a site that purports to be science based and she regales in citing statistics about who is attracted to whom or what and how early or late people transition. It is also clearly focused on making favorable distinctions towards homosexual transsexuals at the expense of heterosexual transsexuals perhaps because Ms. Brown happens to be one of the former as well as an advocate of Blanchard's two type model of transsexualism.

I had not visited in ages and yet I was not surprised to see her continued support for Autogynephilia which is really just a rebranding of cross gender arousal and giving it one sole and exacting purpose.

For those still not in the know (although I can’t imagine there are many of you left) this theory uses sleight of hand to basically state that all heterosexual transsexuals transition solely due to their erotic attraction to the idea of converting themselves physically into women. Ostensibly this means that their motivation comes from a perverse form of sexuality instead of an earnest attempt to reconcile with what they believe to be a true core gender identity.

Of course this is not exactly provable and yet Ms. Brown continues to emphatically insist it is undeniable truth while removing possible commentary from those who might respectfully disagree.

Yet it is not particularly hard to inspire doubt in this theory:

1) Is there such a thing as cross gender arousal? absolutely

2) Is it possible that the eroticism experienced is a symptom of pre-existing gender dysphoria? Of course (even Anne Lawrence freely admits this)

3) Is it possible that there are other drivers besides cross gender arousal involved in a decision to transition? positively

Hence we are at a stalemate unless someone sends me something other than statistics on what turns transsexuals on.

It’s actually hard to believe that a young smart transgender person would base an important decision such as a transition solely on sexual feelings and I would like to think they are using a broader range of criteria which most importantly includes whether it will make them happy.

Those of us who are older were more likely to have fallen victim to its spell and indeed Anne Lawrence (its biggest proponent and admitted sufferer) has tried hard to sell the idea to a trans community who thinks there is considerably more to being transgender than a fetish. As a retort, well-informed activists like Julia Serano have done a very thorough job at finding the fissures in its structure.

But even if this theory (and it is still officially considered that last time I checked) were somehow correct and it turned out that gynephilic transsexuals were happier post-surgery then that would be sufficient motivation. The problem for me is Ms. Brown's insistence that its all based on irrefutable evidence which leaves her looking disingenuous because, as I have shown in my points above, the theory cannot be resolutely proven without the perfect magnifying glass into someone's brain.

Nevertheless, it's looking like Autogynephilia is well poised to die out with the baby boomers who created and propagated it so it doesn't concern me all that much, however intellectual dishonesty does and I like to correct it when I see it most especially if it makes another transgender person suffer.

Fortunately for gynephilic gender dysphorics like me (and I suspect most of you), we have been afforded the ability to think with our brains as well as our penises.

Now please read Rachel the trans philosopher's take on AGP which I think has much merit...

https://transphilosopher.com/2017/02/28/autogynephilia-the-gift-that-keeps-on-giving/

Comments

  1. I've thought about your post for a couple of hours this morning and find the subjects, both of Autogynephilia and Kay Brown very interesting. I completely agree that Blanchard et al are entirely incorrect in their theory and, like Trump, try to skew their data and observations to support their assertions. Not very scientific.

    But regarding Ms. Brown, I don't really care if she thinks that she transitioned solely because she is gay and finds her transition erotic. I wonder if she still does. Perhaps she feels compelled to adamantly say that since otherwise she'd have to admit something else? We'll probably never know.

    I read that she is married andI wonder what her husband thinks. Does he think he is homosexual, while married to Kay a transwoman?

    In the end most (I almost wrote "all") agree that Blanchard is both harmful and way out of line, and his pseudoscience will go the way of the dodo.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. just to clarify Emma: androphilics do not experience eroticism (or at least very few do) versus a larger number of gynephilics that do. However, Blanchard still made everything about sex by stating that androphilics were simply homosexual men in search of heterosexual partners as impetus for transition. My point in all this is that the two-type model is overly simplistic and makes assumptions with insufficient knowledge to back it up. Go back and read about Kurt Freund to understand the origin...

      Delete
    2. Thanks Joanna, for your clarification. I will go back and study more. :-) At least you know my heart's in the right place!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

the pseudoscience behind gender dysphoria

The real science as to what causes gender dysphoria still awaits.

Harry Benjamin was on to something except he didn’t have the scientific evidence to back up his suspicions hence, like a true scientist, he negated to draw conclusions. His hunch, based on treating so many patients over his lifetime, was that one is born with a predisposition to be gender dysphoric.

However, with inconclusive brain scans and no DNA marker (as of yet) we are left with believing the word of people who need help and only want to lead happy and productive lives.

The best we have been able to muster since Benjamin's death in 1986 was to amass statistics on who gets a boner imagining themselves as a woman which is in equal parts pathetic and disappointing. For this is not really science at all but is instead playing with interview data that doesn't point to anything definitive or conclusive. I have dealt with this problem at great length in my blog.

The whole thing started with Kurt Freund's obses…

looking past cross gender arousal

Jack’s latest Crossdreamers post got me thinking about cross gender arousal and how it could be avoided; also whether it even matters. This with particular focus on the inability to relate of someone on the outside looking in.

You see, sexuality is a very complicated thing to begin with and when you then add gender identity ambiguity it becomes a recipe to really confuse someone.

So imagine that you are a little boy who identifies as a girl but then along comes puberty and short circuits everything by having the sex you identify with also be the sex you are attracted to. For in essence this is what happens to all all male to female gender dysphoric trans persons who are attracted to women.

So I ask myself: can I imagine a scenario where this inherent contradiction would not produce sexual confusion? The answer is that I cannot.

I am in the unique position, like many of you, to have experienced an early identification with the feminine become sexualized later on. This brought confusion…

understanding the erotic component

I have written about crossed wires before in two separate posts. The idea is that one cannot pass through puberty and the development of sexual feelings for females and not have your pre-existing gender dysphoria be impacted through your psychosexual development. The hormone responsible for your libido is testosterone which is present in much stronger concentration in males and is why gynephilics are most likely to experience erotic overtones as the conflict between romantic external feelings and their pull towards the feminine become permanently intertwined.

Because I came from a deeply religious family where sex was not discussed much at all, I grew up with little access to information and was very much ignorant of matters relating to the subject. With no firsthand experience in intercourse until I married I was then faced with the reality that my ability to perform sexually had been deeply impacted by my dysphoric feelings. This began years of turmoil and self-deprecating thoughts …