Skip to main content

looking past cross gender arousal

Jack’s latest Crossdreamers post got me thinking about cross gender arousal and how it could be avoided; also whether it even matters. This with particular focus on the inability to relate of someone on the outside looking in.

You see, sexuality is a very complicated thing to begin with and when you then add gender identity ambiguity it becomes a recipe to really confuse someone.

So imagine that you are a little boy who identifies as a girl but then along comes puberty and short circuits everything by having the sex you identify with also be the sex you are attracted to. For in essence this is what happens to all all male to female gender dysphoric trans persons who are attracted to women.

So I ask myself: can I imagine a scenario where this inherent contradiction would not produce sexual confusion? The answer is that I cannot.

I am in the unique position, like many of you, to have experienced an early identification with the feminine become sexualized later on. This brought confusion and shame but this shouldn't be an automatic response unless your only frame of reference is traditional Judeo-Christian thinking where anything other than missionary position sex for the purposes of procreation was an aberration.

Taken out of this reference point however it is clear that the repeatability of this phenomenon for the gender dysphoric means that it is almost universal. The unique combination of being straight and having gender dysphoria, which only a tiny fraction of the population is exposed to, is its foundation.

Androphilic transsexuals don’t experience cross gender arousal and neither do gay males when they crossdress for the simple reason that they are not drawn sexually to women or their clothing. Hence any dysphoria they experience will be unfettered by this phenomenon.

The key for the heterosexual transgender person is in essence to look past cross gender arousal and determine a course of action which may or may not include transition.

The fact that I experienced it used to distress me greatly but it no longer does for I also know it does not define me entirely as a transgender person. It simply forms part of my sexuality which was shaped in a very unique and particular way.

Advocates for Autogynephilia want to paint us as sexual perverts but we know better because we have our own history as evidence. When you examine yours earnestly you will know your own truth.

Think of it this way: given the current scientific vacuum that exists on this topic, how can someone who doesn’t know what it’s like to be you accurately explain and define you?


Comments

  1. "Think of it this way: given the current scientific vacuum that exists on this topic, how can someone who doesn’t know what it’s like to be you accurately explain and define you?"

    Excellent point, Joanna. I've often felt a need to emphasize to cis folks that I doubt they can come close to understanding the struggle and confusions and shame about growing up trans and living with that secret.

    Back to the point about cross-gender arousal: in light of knowing that I am transgender it all makes sense to me. I've always envied girls (and later, women) so it seems like a small leap to then find the source of my envy to also be intensely arousing sexually, both with women (i.e., heterosexually) and as a woman (e.g., fantasizing and role-playing).

    I'm almost 61 and I can tell you that my sex drive is in decline. Not gone by any means but reduced to the point where I have a perspective that I can use to understand my arousal and how that relates to my trans feelings and vice versa.

    It sure felt impossible over the previous decades to do this. I hoped that I didn't want to be a woman as much as just dress like one, feel the fabrics, the sensations. I see now that I was being fooled by my sexual drive as well as what I learned from society (including Blanchard et al) that I wasn't okay. It's so gratifying to at least know now that all of that was BS.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. it takes a while to get past the BS to understand yourself because society tells you to fight your own instincts. You might also have noted that even as your sex drive declines your sense being trans does not diminish one iota..

      Delete
  2. Oh yes when I was a kid (in the early 70s) struggling with my feelings (and hiding them as best I could) when I hit puberty and was attracted to women (mostly) it confused me even more. How could I want to be a woman who wants sex with a woman?

    It actually would have been much easier if I had been exclusively male attracted, I would have probably worked myself out far sooner than I did.

    it is difficult enough these days being a female attracted (or bisexual) trans women, but back in those days it was recipe for total confusion.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes it would have been easier Lisa and would have avoided much mental distress. Water under the bridge now but I still remember those days very well...

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

prejudice disguised as objective rectitude

So here is Professor Jordan Peterson perhaps justly calling out the excesses of political correctness gone mad. But then he extends it to not indulging transgender people the basic dignity of being addressed in their preferred pronoun. To do so for him would cost nothing and to stand on literal principle seems to serve little use other than to send a message of disdain.

If you have transitioned or even live as the opposite gender is costs me nothing to address you in your preferred pronouns. What difference does it make to me and what am I trying to tell you when I don't?

Peterson wants to stand on his rights to call reality what it is except that in this case the exact objective escapes me. But of course the right wing Federalist is in love with him because he calls a spade a spade.

If I see a rock I can call it that but then the rock doesn’t have any feelings. To address a transgender woman "her" and "she" is not undermining my rights as a person in any way b…

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.

the pseudoscience behind gender dysphoria

The real science as to what causes gender dysphoria still awaits.

Harry Benjamin was on to something except he didn’t have the scientific evidence to back up his suspicions hence, like a true scientist, he negated to draw conclusions. His hunch, based on treating so many patients over his lifetime, was that one is born with a predisposition to be gender dysphoric.

However, with inconclusive brain scans and no DNA marker (as of yet) we are left with believing the word of people who need help and only want to lead happy and productive lives.

The best we have been able to muster since Benjamin's death in 1986 was to amass statistics on who gets a boner imagining themselves as a woman which is in equal parts pathetic and disappointing. For this is not really science at all but is instead playing with interview data that doesn't point to anything definitive or conclusive. I have dealt with this problem at great length in my blog.

The whole thing started with Kurt Freund's obses…