Skip to main content

right in the pocketbook

Burlington Vermont shop keepers are getting worried as they depend heavily on Canadian patrons.

The Church street mall is a lovely cobbled stone avenue with cafes, restaurants and shops where I have be to a number of times in my life. Vermonters are also generally lovely people.

But lately they are seeing less Canadians venture over the border as more of them are being turned away. Last week it was a Canadian born young woman of Middle Eastern heritage being refused entry into the country. The reason has yet to be explained.

Welcome to Donald Trump’s America.

On television a board of trade official was being interviewed for Canadian news and distanced himself from the current politics by stating that Vermont runs counter current to the happenings in Washington and I believe him. The northeast is not like the rest of the country and most Americans there are of democratic bent. They also see this with the same sense of shock and awe that we do.

But their government has been taken over by extremists.

This morning on the radio I heard of another school graduation trip to the United States being cancelled due to some members of the class being of Muslim origin. They decided to go to Toronto instead rather than risk one of them being turned away. One of the students said “we all go or none of us go”

I hate to say it but good for them.


Church Street, Burlington

Comments

  1. "I hate to say it ..."

    No, please say it, LOUD and OFTEN! We need everyone in America (particularly the red states) and the World to hear these stories. Until, like the Boy Scouts and Boston's St. Patrick's parade, they feel the pressure (typically economic) they won't dump Trump. We especially need Congress and SCOTUS to wake up, as well as state governor's such as North Carolina and Texas.

    Let's hear it!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

prejudice disguised as objective rectitude

So here is Professor Jordan Peterson perhaps justly calling out the excesses of political correctness gone mad. But then he extends it to not indulging transgender people the basic dignity of being addressed in their preferred pronoun. To do so for him would cost nothing and to stand on literal principle seems to serve little use other than to send a message of disdain.

If you have transitioned or even live as the opposite gender is costs me nothing to address you in your preferred pronouns. What difference does it make to me and what am I trying to tell you when I don't?

Peterson wants to stand on his rights to call reality what it is except that in this case the exact objective escapes me. But of course the right wing Federalist is in love with him because he calls a spade a spade.

If I see a rock I can call it that but then the rock doesn’t have any feelings. To address a transgender woman "her" and "she" is not undermining my rights as a person in any way b…

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.

looking past cross gender arousal

Jack’s latest Crossdreamers post got me thinking about cross gender arousal and how it could be avoided; also whether it even matters. This with particular focus on the inability to relate of someone on the outside looking in.

You see, sexuality is a very complicated thing to begin with and when you then add gender identity ambiguity it becomes a recipe to really confuse someone.

So imagine that you are a little boy who identifies as a girl but then along comes puberty and short circuits everything by having the sex you identify with also be the sex you are attracted to. For in essence this is what happens to all all male to female gender dysphoric trans persons who are attracted to women.

So I ask myself: can I imagine a scenario where this inherent contradiction would not produce sexual confusion? The answer is that I cannot.

I am in the unique position, like many of you, to have experienced an early identification with the feminine become sexualized later on. This brought confusion…