Skip to main content

Jenner learns

Caitlyn Jenner had a steep learning curve but she has improved.

When she first came out there was a kind of obtuseness present borne out of living your life in a bubble. Yes she had been deeply dysphoric all of her life and finally took the steps required to live authentically but she couldn't relate to people who were far less fortunate. Before coming out she had never even met another transgender person.

Still she faced her own detractors and the offensive bile thrown her way on social media was impressive and pulled no punches. The paparazzi followed her every move and they mocked as they took photos. In the end whether you live in the public eye or in private, the life of a trans person is not easy.

I think you will agree as you watch this brief exchange with Seth Meyers that she has come a long way in the last two years and whatever advocacy she can muster can only help to bring attention to the plight of those in our community who are not quite so fortunate.

Jenner shows us we are not a monolithic group and our ideas and our politics will differ and that being trans is part of your overall identity which doesn't define every aspect of your being....


Comments

  1. Jenner was not the only one who underestimated the way the Republican Party has become more extremist and bigoted. Her idea that Trump could be a champion of LGBT rights would have made sense if he was an open minded Conservative of the European kind, or -- for that matter -- a moderat American Conservative.

    There aren't that many moderate Conservatives left in the Republican Party, though, and those who remain are mostly silent. The focus on the freedom of the individual has been replaced by a desperate need to force traditionalist and reactionary ideas on to the whole of society.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jack completely agree although Trump is not so much an extremist Republican as simply a narcissistic opportunist. He has flipped-flopped his way from one party to the other and one platform to the other. He has surrounded himself with the cabal of Sessions and Bannon who are openly hostile to LGBT issues and so he just follows suit. I don't think Trump is clever or tactical enough to have these strong opinions...

      Delete
  2. I agree with your thoughts on her evolution. At the outset I wasn't happy Caitlyn was elevated to the position of our media spokesperson because of her many blind spots, but her openness to growth and learning makes it okay. Her visibility is, on the whole, better for us than not. After six decades of invisibility, I won't quibble.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. this is a good point Ally. She may not have been our first choice of spokesperson but after being invisible for so long we will take someone out there holding out a torch..

      Delete
    2. I agree with Ally. As much as I also quibble with Caitlyn, her visibility is good for us. That, and she is also showing a human side where she is learning as she goes. Don't we all? And, isn't it amazing (and almost unbelievable) that she went through all her GD and transition without talking to another transwoman? Sure, she had a lot to lose what with her celebrity status and all. Still, I find that amazing and I congratulate her on her fortitude.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

prejudice disguised as objective rectitude

So here is Professor Jordan Peterson perhaps justly calling out the excesses of political correctness gone mad. But then he extends it to not indulging transgender people the basic dignity of being addressed in their preferred pronoun. To do so for him would cost nothing and to stand on literal principle seems to serve little use other than to send a message of disdain.

If you have transitioned or even live as the opposite gender is costs me nothing to address you in your preferred pronouns. What difference does it make to me and what am I trying to tell you when I don't?

Peterson wants to stand on his rights to call reality what it is except that in this case the exact objective escapes me. But of course the right wing Federalist is in love with him because he calls a spade a spade.

If I see a rock I can call it that but then the rock doesn’t have any feelings. To address a transgender woman "her" and "she" is not undermining my rights as a person in any way b…

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.

the pseudoscience behind gender dysphoria

The real science as to what causes gender dysphoria still awaits.

Harry Benjamin was on to something except he didn’t have the scientific evidence to back up his suspicions hence, like a true scientist, he negated to draw conclusions. His hunch, based on treating so many patients over his lifetime, was that one is born with a predisposition to be gender dysphoric.

However, with inconclusive brain scans and no DNA marker (as of yet) we are left with believing the word of people who need help and only want to lead happy and productive lives.

The best we have been able to muster since Benjamin's death in 1986 was to amass statistics on who gets a boner imagining themselves as a woman which is in equal parts pathetic and disappointing. For this is not really science at all but is instead playing with interview data that doesn't point to anything definitive or conclusive. I have dealt with this problem at great length in my blog.

The whole thing started with Kurt Freund's obses…