Skip to main content

malaise in the West

Western liberal democracies are being threatened and, as more wealth is being held in the hands of fewer people, the unbalance is reeking havoc on the stability of the societies they house.

The net effect of this is that the elite are the ones who set policy instead of focusing on what is best for the whole. In the United States both parties are beholden to special interest benefactors who then demand to have their say. The recent healthcare bill failure was one such example but there are many others.

The post World War II boom was an anomaly in that mass immigration from Europe accompanied by the need to rebuild that ravaged continent allowed America to build a prosperous middle class. The post war baby boom then became the generation who profited from their parents's ability to see them through advanced education to construct the nation's ruling political class.

Today most wealth is not amassed through toil and hard work. Yes there are exceptions such as technology purveyors Bill Gates or Steve Jobs but it is actually about being born into the right family. In that sense the American dream ideology that everyone can prosper equally has vanished into thin air.

As a prime example, Donald Trump was born into money and without it he wouldn’t have gotten far. Even then he is an abject failure at most things he attempts and, coupled with lack of intellectual capacity or curiosity, he is barely able to string coherent sentences together.

The problem is that income disparity at such extreme levels will invariably see nations implode from within as the basic needs of the majority are not met to make way for the aspirations of the top echelon. To not see this amounts to complete stupidity or complete lack of empathy for it is obvious that the health of a country is only as strong as the weakest link in the chain. Power corrupts absolutely and unless this imbalance is addressed the United States and any other democracies who have hitched their wagon to the Neo-Liberal philosophy that open border markets are enough, are in for a very hard lesson. What was forgotten when global markets were opened is that lack of safeguards only guarantees that greed will be the primary motivator at the expense of health inside national borders.

The discontent with this model is what allowed an opportunistic moron like Trump to gain power and even if this set back is only temporary, the underlying problem must be addressed or face dire consequences.

It is no secret why the happiest nations are socialist democracies for the disparity is not as extreme and many of the basic needs of its populace are met. Let us hope that at least they stay sufficiently healthy.


Comments

  1. The United States has devolved into oligarchic feudalism. Only, those in charge are not ostensibly aristocratic families or houses of nobility, but corporations. This allows for the nefariously persuasive argument to the American populace that wealth enjoyed is necessarily wealth earned through capitalistic effort. You aren't rich? Shame on you.

    The WWII generation invested in the general welfare, and built a thriving infrastructure awash in government programs the next generation benefited from, only to turn around and call them evil and socialist. Sure, it took hard work for them to climb the ladders built for them by generations past, but it takes a different kind of audacity to claim you also built the ladders. It takes something else entirely, a form of delusion or psychopathy to actually burn the ladders down.

    And the current oligarchs also play off the instinctive fear of loss, demonizing anyone who wants to fortify New Deal and Great Society programs as government sanctioned thieves coming to take away whatever you have earned. I have watched the American right wing, now in charge of both of the only viable political parties, perfect this kabuki and slight of hand over the course of my lifetime. Essentially, Americans are told to pull themselves up by their own bootstraps by the very people who just stole their boots.

    It can't last forever. And their Achilles heel seems to be their penchant for backing candidates who are increasingly obvious in either their aristocracy or their buffoonery. They're getting lazy and phoning it in for a new generation born into the harsh world they've created who won't aren't readily susceptible to their rhetoric. Leaders like Bernie Sanders are gaining back the voice stripped of them by in the Reagan era. What happens next is unknown, but it is sure to be interesting.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are most welcome. Thank YOU for the blog.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

prejudice disguised as objective rectitude

So here is Professor Jordan Peterson perhaps justly calling out the excesses of political correctness gone mad. But then he extends it to not indulging transgender people the basic dignity of being addressed in their preferred pronoun. To do so for him would cost nothing and to stand on literal principle seems to serve little use other than to send a message of disdain.

If you have transitioned or even live as the opposite gender is costs me nothing to address you in your preferred pronouns. What difference does it make to me and what am I trying to tell you when I don't?

Peterson wants to stand on his rights to call reality what it is except that in this case the exact objective escapes me. But of course the right wing Federalist is in love with him because he calls a spade a spade.

If I see a rock I can call it that but then the rock doesn’t have any feelings. To address a transgender woman "her" and "she" is not undermining my rights as a person in any way b…

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.

the pseudoscience behind gender dysphoria

The real science as to what causes gender dysphoria still awaits.

Harry Benjamin was on to something except he didn’t have the scientific evidence to back up his suspicions hence, like a true scientist, he negated to draw conclusions. His hunch, based on treating so many patients over his lifetime, was that one is born with a predisposition to be gender dysphoric.

However, with inconclusive brain scans and no DNA marker (as of yet) we are left with believing the word of people who need help and only want to lead happy and productive lives.

The best we have been able to muster since Benjamin's death in 1986 was to amass statistics on who gets a boner imagining themselves as a woman which is in equal parts pathetic and disappointing. For this is not really science at all but is instead playing with interview data that doesn't point to anything definitive or conclusive. I have dealt with this problem at great length in my blog.

The whole thing started with Kurt Freund's obses…