Skip to main content

malaise in the West

Western liberal democracies are being threatened and, as more wealth is being held in the hands of fewer people, the unbalance is reeking havoc on the stability of the societies they house.

The net effect of this is that the elite are the ones who set policy instead of focusing on what is best for the whole. In the United States both parties are beholden to special interest benefactors who then demand to have their say. The recent healthcare bill failure was one such example but there are many others.

The post World War II boom was an anomaly in that mass immigration from Europe accompanied by the need to rebuild that ravaged continent allowed America to build a prosperous middle class. The post war baby boom then became the generation who profited from their parents's ability to see them through advanced education to construct the nation's ruling political class.

Today most wealth is not amassed through toil and hard work. Yes there are exceptions such as technology purveyors Bill Gates or Steve Jobs but it is actually about being born into the right family. In that sense the American dream ideology that everyone can prosper equally has vanished into thin air.

As a prime example, Donald Trump was born into money and without it he wouldn’t have gotten far. Even then he is an abject failure at most things he attempts and, coupled with lack of intellectual capacity or curiosity, he is barely able to string coherent sentences together.

The problem is that income disparity at such extreme levels will invariably see nations implode from within as the basic needs of the majority are not met to make way for the aspirations of the top echelon. To not see this amounts to complete stupidity or complete lack of empathy for it is obvious that the health of a country is only as strong as the weakest link in the chain. Power corrupts absolutely and unless this imbalance is addressed the United States and any other democracies who have hitched their wagon to the Neo-Liberal philosophy that open border markets are enough, are in for a very hard lesson. What was forgotten when global markets were opened is that lack of safeguards only guarantees that greed will be the primary motivator at the expense of health inside national borders.

The discontent with this model is what allowed an opportunistic moron like Trump to gain power and even if this set back is only temporary, the underlying problem must be addressed or face dire consequences.

It is no secret why the happiest nations are socialist democracies for the disparity is not as extreme and many of the basic needs of its populace are met. Let us hope that at least they stay sufficiently healthy.


Comments

  1. The United States has devolved into oligarchic feudalism. Only, those in charge are not ostensibly aristocratic families or houses of nobility, but corporations. This allows for the nefariously persuasive argument to the American populace that wealth enjoyed is necessarily wealth earned through capitalistic effort. You aren't rich? Shame on you.

    The WWII generation invested in the general welfare, and built a thriving infrastructure awash in government programs the next generation benefited from, only to turn around and call them evil and socialist. Sure, it took hard work for them to climb the ladders built for them by generations past, but it takes a different kind of audacity to claim you also built the ladders. It takes something else entirely, a form of delusion or psychopathy to actually burn the ladders down.

    And the current oligarchs also play off the instinctive fear of loss, demonizing anyone who wants to fortify New Deal and Great Society programs as government sanctioned thieves coming to take away whatever you have earned. I have watched the American right wing, now in charge of both of the only viable political parties, perfect this kabuki and slight of hand over the course of my lifetime. Essentially, Americans are told to pull themselves up by their own bootstraps by the very people who just stole their boots.

    It can't last forever. And their Achilles heel seems to be their penchant for backing candidates who are increasingly obvious in either their aristocracy or their buffoonery. They're getting lazy and phoning it in for a new generation born into the harsh world they've created who won't aren't readily susceptible to their rhetoric. Leaders like Bernie Sanders are gaining back the voice stripped of them by in the Reagan era. What happens next is unknown, but it is sure to be interesting.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are most welcome. Thank YOU for the blog.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

the pseudoscience behind gender dysphoria

The real science as to what causes gender dysphoria still awaits.

Harry Benjamin was on to something except he didn’t have the scientific evidence to back up his suspicions hence, like a true scientist, he negated to draw conclusions. His hunch, based on treating so many patients over his lifetime, was that one is born with a predisposition to be gender dysphoric.

However, with inconclusive brain scans and no DNA marker (as of yet) we are left with believing the word of people who need help and only want to lead happy and productive lives.

The best we have been able to muster since Benjamin's death in 1986 was to amass statistics on who gets a boner imagining themselves as a woman which is in equal parts pathetic and disappointing. For this is not really science at all but is instead playing with interview data that doesn't point to anything definitive or conclusive. I have dealt with this problem at great length in my blog.

The whole thing started with Kurt Freund's obses…

looking past cross gender arousal

Jack’s latest Crossdreamers post got me thinking about cross gender arousal and how it could be avoided; also whether it even matters. This with particular focus on the inability to relate of someone on the outside looking in.

You see, sexuality is a very complicated thing to begin with and when you then add gender identity ambiguity it becomes a recipe to really confuse someone.

So imagine that you are a little boy who identifies as a girl but then along comes puberty and short circuits everything by having the sex you identify with also be the sex you are attracted to. For in essence this is what happens to all all male to female gender dysphoric trans persons who are attracted to women.

So I ask myself: can I imagine a scenario where this inherent contradiction would not produce sexual confusion? The answer is that I cannot.

I am in the unique position, like many of you, to have experienced an early identification with the feminine become sexualized later on. This brought confusion…

understanding the erotic component

I have written about crossed wires before in two separate posts. The idea is that one cannot pass through puberty and the development of sexual feelings for females and not have your pre-existing gender dysphoria be impacted through your psychosexual development. The hormone responsible for your libido is testosterone which is present in much stronger concentration in males and is why gynephilics are most likely to experience erotic overtones as the conflict between romantic external feelings and their pull towards the feminine become permanently intertwined.

Because I came from a deeply religious family where sex was not discussed much at all, I grew up with little access to information and was very much ignorant of matters relating to the subject. With no firsthand experience in intercourse until I married I was then faced with the reality that my ability to perform sexually had been deeply impacted by my dysphoric feelings. This began years of turmoil and self-deprecating thoughts …